Critical Analysis: Lonely Places By Pico Iyer

What’s difference between being alone and feeling lonely? Some say loneliness is the unhappiness that is often felt when they do not have friends or no one to turn to; some say loneliness is an emotion, but being alone can be a choice. Being to many places usually out of everyone’s travel plan, Pico Iyer finds that we often feel lonely when we are in a crowd, but not part of the it. In his work, “Lonely Places,” Pico Iyer depicts a unique outlook of several “lonely places” where are geographically connected to many neighbors, but politically or socially isolated. However, by focusing on the temporary situations of the “lonely places,” Iyer underestimated the potential of once undeveloped places and misconstrued the real content of people in …show more content…
While it is true that we should not criticize predecessors for overlooking nuances and changes happened after their era, it does not necessarily follow that people can entitle others “lonely” because they are not yet on the world stage. Rome was not built in a day, so were the developing countries. They were in the transition to their past to this incrementally more connected world by progressing themselves, and by the witness of history, many of them succeed. Second, of course, many will probably disagree and raise another question that some areas, such as Tibet, is a truly consecrated religious place, but it also focuses on economy and politics, so it is not true that Tibetans are all satisfied with their beliefs. However, they may over misconstrue the meaning and importance of belief. People have faiths also have physical needs, so they need to make a living for their home and life. Moreover, there are still people do not have religious faiths in religious countries, so they can devote their life to any careers and pursue their own life