Stanford Prison Experiment By Dr. Phil Zimbardo

Superior Essays
Imagine participating in an experiment that uses memory and learning. Once you arrive you see an instrument that gives electric shocks to a man. This man is on the other side of the wall from you. As you move up in voltages the man begins to experience more pain. This man is in so much pain that he is even screaming. The experimenter persuades and pressures you to continue going on. Would you continue the experiment or would you refuse to go on? Stanley Milgram a social psychologist at Yale University asked this same question. Milgram performed a series of experiments that relied on authority and obedience.
Forty-five years later since Milgram presented this experiment society has change, but has people reaction to Milgram’s experiment changed?
…show more content…
Phil Zimbardo is famous for his landmark study in 1971. This study was the Stanford Prison Experiment. Zimbardo paid college students fifteen dollars a day to play the role of a prisoner or guard in a make-believe jail. This jail was ran out of the basement of the Stanford psychology department. These prisoners were given new identities. These identities were numbers that they were known as. The prisoners had to wear loose smocks, no underwear, and tight pantyhose caps. These tight fitting caps represent shaved heads. The guards dressed in khaki uniforms and they had mirrored sunglasses. These guards were also armed with night sticks. Dave Eshelman an eighteen year old at the time decided to become the aggressive guard that was also intimidating. The other guards followed his lead and they started harassing the prisoners. They would wake them up in the middle of the night and make them do counts as a type of punishment. Doug Korpi was one of these prisoners. By twenty-four hours the prisoners launched a full scale rebellion led my Korpi. These prisoners had ripped their numbers off and took off their stocking caps. They even went as far as barricading themselves into the cell and taunting the guards. The guards retaliated by making the prisoners do exercise constantly, deprived them of sleep, food, and bathroom privileges. They also took the prisoners clothes off, took the cots out of the cells, and took the bicycle chains that were on their feet and chained them all together naked. Zimbardo prohibited the use of physical violence so the guards instead used a series of psychological humiliation. Dave one of the guards wanted to humiliate these men. He wanted them to breakdown the solidarity they found in each other. They went even as far enough to shame a rebel prisoner into submission. This prisoner was crying uncontrollably. Two prisoners told Zimbardo they were suffering from severe depression and they had to be removed early from the experiment. In under a

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Zimbardo wanted to see how quickly the guards would adapt to their role as actual prison guards and assert their authority and dominance on the prisoners. He saw that they adapted too quickly; they developed the “authoritarian personality” (pg. 231). The prison guards tormented the prisoners so much that Zimbardo had to end the experiment after one week instead of…

    • 1338 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In human behavior, Obedience is an action which occurs under explicit orders or instructions from a person in authority. Obedience differs from conformity (changing behavior with the purpose of being equivalent to others in a group) and compliance (behavior swayed by another). Two major experiments on obedience is the Milgram and Zimbardo prison experiments. In the Milgram experiment, participants were given clear instructions to administer electric shocks from the experimenter, to a confederate for every answer that was wrong. Sixty-five percent (65%) of the subjects followed through to the very end of the experiment despite the agony of the confederate, even though they were hesitant, because of the experimenter’s orders.…

    • 317 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Study Experiment took place from August 14 - 20, 1971. The experiment was held in the basement psychology building of Stanford University, where a fake prison was set up. Professor Philip Zimbardo led the experiment along with fellow graduate researchers, trying to figure out how the humans react to a situation where they a powerless. They picked several white male middle-class students to take part in the experiment. Half of the students were chosen to be “guards” and the other half were chosen to be “prisoners”.…

    • 420 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo took on the role of prison superintendent, also as the lead psychologist. Looking to see does the situation control your behavior or do you mentally rise above the negative environment. Using social control, “a groups’ formal and informal means of enforcing norms” (Henslin).…

    • 1089 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Some guards were firm but fair, they followed the rules set by the prison. Others were the nice guards who would reward the prisoners and would not punish them. The other guards were belligerent and took every opportunity to humiliate the prisons. They did not have any signs that would predict the different behaviors between the guards in the preliminary screening of the men. Zimbardo invited Christina Maslach who questioned the ethics of the prison experiment.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment was a 1973 study by Philip Zimbardo. The study was to investigate how people conform to the roles of guards and prisoners in a role-playing experiment which simulated life in prison. The roles between the 21 male college students were randomly assigned the prisoner or guard role. The prisoners were stripped naked, covered in blindfolds, had all their possessions taken away and locked away in cells. They were given prisoner clothing and bedding, being only referred by serial numbers.…

    • 296 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment consisted on choosing 24 men of University of Stanford to play role as guards and prisoners in a fake prison built in the University basement. The experiment was conducted by the psychology professor Phillip Zimbardo, who wanted to investigate the difficulties caused in America penal system. He wanted to find out if the negative environment such as the prison would lead people with good personalities in acting different of what they usually do. Therefore, he would like to see if the students were going to assume the role of guards and prisoners, and how this would affect their behavior, because this position would give to the guards the sense of power over the other students, and the students assigned as prisoners…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Stanford Prison Experiment is perhaps one of the most known and controversial psychological experiments in both psychology and criminology. While the Stanford Prison Experiment did invoke questions as to the results of the experiment, it invoked more questions as to ethics in psychological experiments and what is acceptable. The Stanford Prison Experiment by Philip Zimbardo asks for student volunteers for a paid experiment where students would be randomly selected to play guard and prisoner in a mock prison at Stanford University. The experiment was called off by Zimbardo himself after being confronted by a college and many of the prisoner’s emotional breakdowns. There is the ACJS code of standards in regards to the treatment of human…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Stanford Prison Experiment, psychologist Dr. Philip G. Zimbardo acquired a group of volunteers to participate in a prison simulation. This group of college-age boys would go on to become prisoners and guards for two weeks with a payment of $15 a day. However, the experiment quickly became out of control. The prisoners started to break down rapidly due to their lack of sense of time and sudden loss of freedom. Initially, they lashed out at the guards saying how the guards had no real control over them.…

    • 849 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Philip Zimbardo's experiment on prison life showed how quickly a person can dissolve their own identity to fit into the social roles expected of them. He convert the basement of the University psychology department into prison. The experiment is about to see people's responses to an oppressive regime to observe if they will accept it or will fight against it. He choose 24 students with no criminal record, no mental or behavioral problem.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ‘Prisoners’ on the other hand, lost their own identity in the process of becoming a ‘prisoner’. They lost sight of their own uniqueness and become like other ‘prisoners’. The also lost all sense of control because they felt unsure of how to react to the ‘guards’ and be perceived as defiant, and therefore be exposed to aggression from the ‘guards’. Finally, the loss of control within the mock prison, led them to realize they never want to lose power and control and therefore, they strive to gain control back in their lives…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In our conclusion the research supported the situational theory. Literature Review In 1973, Philip Zimbardo decided to find out a psychological study on how a human would respond while in captivity. He did this as he was a junior lecturer at Stanford's Psychology Department. He took students…

    • 486 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He wanted to understand the behavior between two groups without an authority head being present. He randomly assigned students to either be guards or prisoners and he created a mock prison in the basement of the Stanford Psychology building. It was supposed to carry out for two weeks, but due to the multiple breakdowns of the prisoners and abuse that erupted he had to terminate it after just 6 days. Yet again another shocking turn of events that no one would have even guessed could occur, and did in such a short amount of time. As stated by Haslam and Reicher (2012), Zimbardo concluded that people conform to oppressive behavior to fit the authoritative role that they are assigned, even without specific orders (p.2).…

    • 1763 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Because he was the third prisoner to show symptoms of distress this severe, Zimbardo was suspicious of him and concluded that he was faking to be able to leave like the previously released prisoners. After “browbeating” the prisoner into staying, he left to get food. While he was away, the prisoners lined up, chanting, "Prisoner #819 is a bad prisoner. Because of what Prisoner #819 did, my cell is a mess, Mr. Correctional Officer,’" a dozen times (Zimbardo). In the photo, he is curled into a ball on the ground in tears, hearing the chanting.…

    • 1748 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    One character in particular was shown in most of the film, he was known as Prisoner 8612 who had a mental breakdown from the abuse that he was given by the prison guards. He showed many signs of rebellion such as talking back to the prison guards and planning an escape out of the simulated prison. He tried to bring about a collective will to overthrow the guards and win back their rights. He was one of the most vocal out of the participants and was sent to “The Hole” very often. This was a dark, enclosed utility closet that was transformed into a cell used…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays