Comparing The Milgram And Zimbardo Prison Experiments

Improved Essays
In human behavior, Obedience is an action which occurs under explicit orders or instructions from a person in authority. Obedience differs from conformity (changing behavior with the purpose of being equivalent to others in a group) and compliance (behavior swayed by another). Two major experiments on obedience is the Milgram and Zimbardo prison experiments. In the Milgram experiment, participants were given clear instructions to administer electric shocks from the experimenter, to a confederate for every answer that was wrong. Sixty-five percent (65%) of the subjects followed through to the very end of the experiment despite the agony of the confederate, even though they were hesitant, because of the experimenter’s orders. The Zimbardo prison

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The goal of this paper is to review and analyze the article written by Stanley Milgram in 1963. This experiment was considered to be one of the most acknowledged research in the history of social psychology that revealed the unpredicted side of human nature. The author described the tendencies of obedience as inevitable part of our lives, particularly since we live in the complex systems of society where human interaction is unavoidable. He illustrated that this specific tendencies of human behavior was extremely relevant at this specific time in history, during which millions of innocent lives had systematically been lost through wars and fascist movements. It is clearly evident that the author became deeply curious about the nature of “obedience”…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Milligram’s experiment was based on his interest in researching who and how would someone obey authority figures. He was driven by the thought that maybe there is something about human nature that led people to obey. Having studied previously both Milgram and Zimbardo’s obedience studies, it was easier for me to analyze and apply it to the purpose of the book. The authors point out that although general results are important, there was not much thought put into the difference among the individuals in the experiments. Milgram focused on the 65% of subjects who obeyed the authority, but was less interested on why the 35% of the subjects…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For obedience, the experimenter would take up more of an authoritarian figure, where the subject felt that he had to comply with the authoritarian personality. The subject already…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Variations of his experiment have been conducted over many years and in other settings with similar findings. The effect of authority on obedience is striking. People obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative, even when acting against their own better judgment and desires. The vast majority of people will obey authority even when it overrides their own moral judgement. Their feelings of duty and personal emotion are separated, and responsibility shifts in the mind of the subordinate to that of the authority figure.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1962, Stanley Milgram surprised the world with his study on obedience. To test his theory he invented an electronic box that would become a window into human cruelty. In ascending order, a row of buttons marked the amount of voltage one person would inflict upon another. Milgram’s original motive for the experiment was to understand the unthinkable: How could the German people permit the extermination of the Jews? Stanley Milgram wanted to understand the necessary conditions in which a person would obey an authority who commanded actions that went against conscience.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Stanley Milgram, a Yale University psychologist, shares his results from an experiment he conducted in regards to obedience of authority in 1963 in, “The Perils of Obedience.” His experiment illustrated that when put under particular circumstances, ordinary citizens have the capability to perform terrible and unexpected actions (Milgram 85). Milgram rationalizes these proceedings through the conclusion that the average individual will decide to please the experimenter rather than resist his authority to protect the wellbeing of the learner (Milgram 86). Diana Baumrind, a psychologist who worked at the Institute of Human Development at the University of California, writes in response to Milgram’s experiment “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Importance of Obedience Obedience is an extremely important aspect of our society and plays a huge role in today's civilized lifestyle. People in a civil society have been raised to believe that obeying orders will have a positive outcome and disobeying comes with negative consequences. There have been many experiments over time that have tested the lengths that people would go to obey orders or conform to expectations under the directions from an authority figure. Philip G. Zimbardo conducted The Stanford Prison Experiment and Stanley Milgram conducted The Perils of Obedience, to determine how far individuals would go to be obedient or conform to an authority figure when given orders or roles that went against their basic values.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Report on the Stanford Prison Experiment for PSYC 1111 The Office of Naval Research sponsored a study at Stanford University to "develop a better understanding of the basic psychological mechanisms underlying human aggression" and to identify which conditions can lead to aggression when men are living in close quarters for a long period of time (Haney, C., Banks, W.C. & Zimbardo, P.G. (1973)). This experiment took form within a model prison created in the basement at Stanford University to discover the variables found in prisons that can lead to aggression in people, i.e. guards and prisoners. The hypothesis explored was that ‘guards’ and ‘prisoners’ would react in different ways and their behavior and state of being would differ from each…

    • 963 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experimenter in Milgram’s study was present in the same room where a participant was performing his task. Moreover, if the participant expressed doubts regarding further continuation, the experimenter would encourage him to continue four times using phrases such as ‘Please continue’ or ‘It is absolutely essential that you continue’ (1963 cited in Banyard, 2012). In Hofling et al.’s experiment the authority commanded the participants through a telephone and asked them to carry out the order before the authority arrived to the hospital. As the further Milgram’s research on different variations of his experiment shows, the presence of an authority is an important factor increasing the impact of obedience to…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The test proved that seemingly normal people are likely to follow orders given by a person of authority even to the extent of killing another because obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up. This experiment forced participant to either violate their conscience by obeying immoral demands or not. Milgram’s experiment recruited forty males to take part in the study of “learning” with a total of six hundred thirty-six participants in eighteen separate tests. The participants actually believed they were shocking a real person unaware that the learner was actually acting like being shocked.…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Critical evaluation of “Rethinking the psychology of tyranny: The BBC prison study” This essay will try to illustrate what are the strengths and the weaknesses of Reicher and Haslam’s experiment and whether the strengths outweigh the weaknesses. Indeed, both researchers came together to understand how individuals can accept, in a group environment, behaviours that are tyrannical whether the individual is the one who inflicts it or undergoes it (Reicher & Haslam, 2006). This experiment, base its research on Zimbardo’s prison experiment. However, it is not a replicate of The Stanford prison experiment (SPE) for different matters. Firstly, Reicher and Haslam aim at creating an experiment that is ethical, with reliable data and that extends the…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Authority has become a powerful force that can easily alter one’s perspective of others. In the article “The Perils of Obedience”, Stanley Milgram shares his experimental study where he sets out to prove that ordinary people perform unethical tasks to the public eye. The people in the experiment are told to say aloud different words, and the learner then has to memorize and repeat them back. If the learner fails to recite the words correctly the subjects deliver a level of shock. The learner is secretively an actor who is not actually receiving shocks at all, but pretends to be in pain for the purpose of the experiment.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A standout amongst the most broadly refered to tests in the field of brain science is the Stanford Prison Experiment in which brain research educator Philip Zimbardo set out to examine the suspicion of parts in an imagined circumstance. The point of the test was to research how promptly individuals would adjust to the parts of watch and detainee in a pretending activity that mimicked jail life. Zimbardo (1973) was occupied with seeing if the severity reported among watchmen in American detainment facilities was because of the perverted identities of the gatekeepers or had more to do with the jail environment. The autonomous variable is the irregular task of parts as either jail monitor or detainee, likewise named 'single treatment variable ' alloted in the SPE to either part as a 'condition '. The reliant variable is the deliberate individual-and gathering conduct in its reaction.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays