Analysis Of Martin Luther King's Letter From Birmingham Jail

Superior Essays
“Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere” (King 113). Martin Luther King Jr. seeks to convince his fellow clergymen in “Letter from Birmingham Jail” that using a nonviolent campaign to end the injustice of segregation is politically, economically, sociologically correct, as well as morally right (117). He does this through a series of appeals. Some of his most effective and inspiring appeals are the logical appeals. He uses logic to convince the clergymen on a moral level that while a nonviolent campaign may include breaking the law or being labeled an extremist, it can peacefully bring justice. Not only do King’s ideas apply to ending segregation, but they can also be used today to peacefully end government control that goes against …show more content…
King answers this statement by showing the difference between just and unjust laws and providing powerful historical examples. In response to why King is breaking the law, he answers, “One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (116). By stating this as a fact, King shows that he believes this statement to be something that everyone will accept without much argument. Then, he focuses on whether a law is just or unjust. Although King goes into a rather lengthy and somewhat repetitive discussion on this subject, what makes this argument effective is the historical examples that he cites. King starts off by showing that Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego refused to obey the laws of Nebuchadnezzar because of a higher moral law; the early Christians also faced lions and death rather than submit to unjust or morally incorrect laws in the Roman Empire (118). These two Christian examples were familiar to the clergymen and helped to explain his definitions. King also cites a more recent example with, “We should never forget that everything Adolf Hitler did in Germany was ‘legal’ … It was ‘Illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany” (118). When this letter was written a few years after World War II, many of the clergymen would have lived through WWII and remembered what it was like. This stark …show more content…
King’s nonviolent campaign was seen as extreme by his fellow clergymen. Although initially disappointed with this title of extremist, King is able to turn it around and show other great heroes who were labeled as extreme during their time. King cites many historical examples such as: “Was not Jesus an extremist for love … Amos an extremist for justice … Martin Luther … John Bunyan … Abraham Lincoln …. Thomas Jefferson” (121). By showing that these heroes were extremists working for a goal, King not only equates himself to these people but shows the impact an extremist can make. These people were able to do unmeasurable amounts of good in both politics and religion; many of them worked against popular opinion and even the government to bring about a better life for people. He is showing the clergymen and all his readers that they could be this kind of hero to the Negro community and possibly the world in general. King asks them what kind of extremists they will be and what cause they will be extreme for (121). King challenges his readers to stand up for what they believe, no matter what names they are called, by showing the readers that their heroes have stood up for their own beliefs in history and the changes that these extremists have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Antigone Case Study

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages

    In his famed “Letter from Birmingham Jail,” Dr. King defends his and other civil rights leaders’ civil disobedience from a jail cell in Alabama. Responding directly to accusations from white Christians that civil disobedience was dangerously destabilizing to government itself, Dr. King outlines a method wherein citizens can disobey unjust laws while still respecting law itself. Recognizing the legitimacy of these concerns, King requires that citizens only disobey unjust laws which are “inflicted upon a minority which that minority had no part in enacting or creating because it did not have the unhampered right to vote,” (King 1963, 80). Furthermore, in order to respect law as an institution, a dissenter must ask him or herself, “are you able to endure the ordeals of jail,” (King 1963 2). He requires that those who break unjust laws “do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty,” (King [Ali-Dinar], 1963).…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A just law is one that is morally sound for the benefit of humanity, while an unjust law is one that degrades human beings. He discusses laws saying, “. . . it may seem paradoxical for us to consciously break laws.” While it may be seemingly “paradoxical” to break laws to promote peace, a law - meant to protect and honor citizens - that inhibits a person from basic human rights is certainly discordant. King has legally trespassed, but ethically, he has the moral imperative of revolting against the injustice.…

    • 652 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In one paragraph, he proves his point that intolerance for a proper cause isn’t something to destroy and should not be looked upon as a negative thing, “Was not Jesus an extremist for Love, Was not Amos and Extremist of justice, was not Paul an extremist for the Christian gospel, and Abraham Lincoln, and Thomas Jefferson. The Question is not whether we will be extremists, but what kind of extremists we will be” (“A Letter from Birmingham Jail” 330). After thoroughly tying in many influential figures in history, King then goes on to question the argument of the Clergymen stating that the demonstrations are at fault in Birmingham and not the social situation already simmering. “Throughout Alabama all sorts of methods are used to prevent Negroes from becoming registered voters, and there are some counties in which not a single Negro is registered” (“Letter from Birmingham Jail”325 ) This attack on the blacks of Alabama in this time brings a harsher insight to what happened to many of the others in this time that nobody cared to see or they just over looked it because they weren’t the same color as them.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King’s letter makes a seriously devastating logical argument. It deals with the realities of the circumstance in a way his critics neglect to do. One of Dr. King’s fundamental contentions in his letter is that just laws ought to be followed and unjust laws should be openly and purposely disobeyed. In any case, with a specific end goal to win individuals over to this simple idea, he needs to accomplish more than connect with his readers’ feelings. So he writes practically like an attorney for an extent, characterizing just and unjust laws from a couple diverse angles.…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By using this logical appeal, King demonstrates that the clergymen should not be condemning the effects, but rather blaming the triggers of the discontentment within the black community. The final criticism King faces is over his “willingness to break laws.” Ibid., 7. After accepting this valid concern, King quickly launches into several paragraphs in defense of lawbreaking as a moral action, established on the notion that there are just laws and there are unjust laws. King’s litmus test for that difference is whether a law…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King informs the clergymen about how it feels to be a Black citizen and how they live under “ominous clouds of inferiority” (176). By using such diction, he is expressing the emotions of the Blacks and how they feel they are misrepresented by many. It shows why Blacks are holding direct demonstrations as they cannot wait for justice any longer. The clergymen describes this fight for justice as “untimely” in which King refutes this claim by discussing how their justice is being delayed as they are always being told to “wait”. King goes on to argue how Blacks no longer want to live in an “abyss of despair” (177) and how they are sick of being the “oppressed.”…

    • 708 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He provides an example of Adolf Hitler. King says, “Everything Hitler did in Germany was “legal’ and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did in Hungary was “illegal. It was illegal to aid and comfort a Jew un Hitler’s Germany” (153). Assassination of Jewish people was legal but unjust. He implies that segregation and discrimination against African Americans is legal but unjust.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He explained that within his thought process, there existed two different types of laws: just and unjust. In King’s opinion, a person had “a moral obligation to disobey unjust laws.” In defense of this way of thinking, he quoted St. Augustine’s assertion that “An unjust law is no law at all.” He provided numerous examples of how one could discern whether a law was just or unjust. In his own words: “A just law is a manmade code that squares with the moral law or the law of God.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the seventh page, King alludes that the accusations of his extremisms are more akin to great leaders of history such than the Black Muslim movement. “Was not Jesus an extremist for love… not Amos an extremist for justice… Was not Paul an extremist for the Christian gospel” (King 7), he positions himself among the aforementioned figures, among others, to establish further credibility and essentially ensure his critics that while they may think his actions are wrong now, in the future they will be revered as extreme actions that brought peace. He asks them, as fellow religious leaders, to entrust faith into his cause, just as the supporters of Jesus did, and the supporters of Martin Luther, Lincoln, the forefathers, and others. This allusion makes for an emotionally compelling argument because it presents his critics with the option to support the status quo or participate in a revolution that is destine to change the world just as Jesus, Lincoln, and others have before him. While this may appear pretentious, it actually elevates his cause to a biblical level.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    appeals to logic in his “Letter From Birmingham Jail” to determine the amount of prejudice behavior that happening in Birmingham. There is data and proof that Birmingham is the most segregated city in the United States. Dr. King states, “In any nonviolent campaign there are four basic steps: collection of the facts to determine whether injustices exist; negotiation; self purification; and direct action” (King para.6). King uses restatement of these steps when he collects data on Birmingham; Birmingham has a record of brutality, Negroes have unfair treatment in courts, and Negroes have had unsolved bombings of their homes and churches. In Birmingham, they went through all of the steps and wanted to negotiate with the city fathers, but they rejected their negotiation.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Well known American Baptist minister and activist, Martin Luther King Jr., optimizes the call to action for his fellow community to resist the unjust laws of the time in his speech, I’ve Been to the Mountain Top. When this speech was delivered, the act of discrimination was worsening, calling for a reform by the colored community. At that point many small victories had been made but Martin Luther King was not satisfied. In this speech, Martin Luther King emphasizes the issue of injustice and the need for immediate change. King specifically creates his exigence by relaying to the audience that the sole purpose of his message is to motivate people to act in a calm manner and stop to create change in the altered world (I’ve Been to The Mountain Top).…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. King’s third response was to the allegation that the peaceful, direct-action triggers violence. He explained his belief that the greatest hindrance to freedom of blacks is the white moderate, who is devoted to “order than justice,” and who prefers “negative peace, which is the absence of tension, to a positive peace, which is the presence of justice.” Dr. King went on to say that it is illogical to assert that their “peaceful actions” initiate violence. He also pointed out that it is immoral to force an individual to forfeit their constitutional rights because it prompts…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This proves how his leadership role as a preacher affects his views on the ways to gain peace. King’s role as a preacher shapes his view on violence because he strongly believes all people deserve to be treated with love and compassion.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He includes the steps for nonviolent campaigning, and then goes on to say that all of the steps have been taken and that the clergymen’s suggestion for negotiating circumstances were attempted, but botched on the white community’s part. This shows the Negroes’ willingness to cooperate with the white leadership on the part of fighting for desegregation, but that mainly the white leadership has not been cooperative. King also forces the clergymen to look at the causes of the demonstrations instead of just the effects. He even tells them, “I am sure that each of you would want to go beyond the superficial social analyst who looks merely at the effects, and does not grapple with underlying causes” (465).…

    • 1875 Words
    • 8 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays