Analysis Of Machiavelli's Discourses On Livy

Improved Essays
Machiavelli came from a family of Florentine officials, though was never a outright citizen of Florence, due to the rules of the republic staging him as an outsider. The era in which Machiavelli had entered was one of common invasions by neighboring powers such as Rome, other city-states. The need for power came from the neighbors of Italy such as the Holy Roman Empire, France and Spain to control the region. The constant fluctuations in the newly formed Political-military alliances continually led to the change of loyalty instituting the rise and fall of many ruling governments. The world and times that Machiavelli was coming into was a strong factor to his view on how his vision of how Florence should be constructed later in life. The instability …show more content…
Machiavelli belief had shifted from that of an old system into believing that the system of republicanism was a more noble one stemmed from the events that surrounded his change. It was at this time the Savonarola had established a republic within Florence, in which the people had more control over their own fates. From this, Machiavelli was able to amend his beliefs with the idea that even though a prince is good for the people, by having two other groups such as the nobility and the popolo watch each other in power, it would keep Florence in check. It is with that a sense of change of how he believes that the balance of power will truly keep authority in check for Florence, that the balance of authority would not allow princes to blame the people for his faults in politics, as the word of the people is far more convincing in the fault of their leader than the leader themselves. It was a shift from a cold view of Florence to one being able to be shifted through the will of the people, such as Guicciardini, who saw a new dawning age in which politics and economic progress would revolutionize Florence as a place of peace within all of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli wrote "The Qualities of the Prince" in July 1513 in Florence, Italy, to convey his idea of the strong, active, and perfect ruler to the current ruling the Medicis. The work is remembered and responsible for bringing “Machiavellian” into wide usage as a pejorative term. The essay takes a stringent position on the proper way to govern a nation. With a straightforward logic, a relevant idea, and an expressed method, Machiavelli’s “The Qualities of the Prince” is a practical guide for current…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Instead, Machiavelli synchronizes the elites and the people. In chapter 26, there’s hard evidence that Machiavelli pushes anyone who has the virtu and fortuna(capable elites) to grab the opportunity and lead the people properly to have stable county that benefits both elites and the people. Machiavelli had enough of the past rulers always benefitting from Italy and not giving back to the people. Machiavelli is tired of seeing a country be rob, and see a great country being oppressed to reach its full potential. Then, to maintain in power, the support of the people are needed.…

    • 1888 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that this is uncharacteristic of Machiavelli, or at least it seems to be because of the way he is often portrayed. Machiavelli is thought of as someone who advocates for tyranny and someone who would defend horrific acts in order to get ahead. Yet, in this story of Pacuvius we see that Machiavelli actually believes or in some way believes that the people should not be oppressed by their government. Machiavelli is often thought of as a person who would tell a prince to go to great extents in order to secure their power but through this story a different side of…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli wrote his Discourses on Livy in 1517, as a response to the Roman historian Livy, in which he goes in depth about his take on republican ideals, including the guardianship of liberty, the effects of religion on the state, and the danger of conspiracies against the sovereign. He argues about who should be responsible for guarding the liberty of the republic, whether or not this power should reside with the people or the noble classes, using the political structure of ancient Rome and of Venice as evidence for his theories. In chapter 12, Machiavelli elaborates on the causes of the disunity of the Italian state, and why religion is responsible for this, being that the Church is both to weak to hold supreme hold over Italy and yet too…

    • 1004 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the excerpt from “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli, Machiavelli does not make rules, but creates guidelines for those who want to be rulers in the renaissance time period. In this time period Italy did not have a central government; it consisted of city-states that each had a ruler. These city-states fought all the time to show who had the most power. This often resulted in the destruction of city-states. Princes in this time were generalized in two ways.…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Machiavelli's Report

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Niccolo Machiavelli’s dissertation The Prince (1513) is a guide to become a successful leader. Leadership is represented through the salient image of the tree which initially captures the viewer’s gaze. This book therefore includes how to conquer principalies and maintain power. The renaissance marked the birth of a period of revival, diverging from the medieval values of religion. It allowed the rise of the new philosophy of humanism which is reflected in Michiavelli’s treatise where he presents a pragmatic understanding of genuine politics.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Niccolo Machiavelli and The Prince Introduction Niccolo Machiavelli is a famous statesman, thinker and one of the founders of modern political science. He was born in the year 1469 at Florence. That is the age of political chaos. The whole country was separated to city governments。In this case, he wrote his masterpiece, The Price, which to be as much praised as blamed. Machiavelli used terse and forceful words elaborate his argument, which had a profound influence in history.…

    • 1199 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Opposing Visions of a Leader and the Ways in Which a Political System Should be Run In times of war, violence, political upheaval, and uncertainty, revolutionary thinkers often emerge to question how rulers can be effective, and what responsibilities they have to the people they rule. Socrates, who fought in the Peloponnesian war and lived during the thirty Tyrants period questioned authority. He challenged societal norms; and tried to change the values of the public. Machiavelli, lived during the fragmented 15th century Renaissance period, wanted to change and reconstruct political organization, and he came up with a new morality on how to judge the state.…

    • 1564 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli Bad

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Throughout history there have been many different types of leaders. Some are considered bad while others are considered good. All of these assumptions are based on how the people under and around the ruler perceives him. If they feel that he has unwanted qualities and has bad judgement then he is considered bad whilst if he is humble and always putting the people first then he is perceived as good. Machiavelli is a man whom went through many hardships in his life.…

    • 1465 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    What makes one happy may not always be the right thing to do. In both The Prince and in The Consolation of Philosophy; themes of happiness, virtue, religion and fortune are investigated further to explain the relation of each in a political arena. In The Consolation of Philosophy, Boethius deals with the universal experience of suffering. He is imprisoned and facing execution. Boethius blames fortune for the reason of his suffering, “Surely the severity of Fortune’s attack on me needs no further mention” (pg. 9).…

    • 2074 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Machiavelli: Republic and Principality Best Fit for the People Niccolo Machiavelli is one of the most influential political thinkers of all time. In his two works, The Prince and The Discourses, he presents ways to successfully form and run both a Republic and a Principality by tying them with the fate to the people. In The Prince, Machiavelli discusses how a ruler can gain power regardless of his morals. While in The Discourses, he talks about how the public should be implemented into a democratic governing system, as well as how institutions could work in the best possible way.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the written work “The Prince” by Niccolo Machiavelli the author elaborates on how a prince can only be a strong leader if he engages in duplicity. Machiavelli focused on a more realistic and immoral strategy to keep the people of his time unified, realpolitik a system based on practical rather than moral considerations. The author, Niccolo Machiavelli, goes through great depths to explain why it takes rulers who are “cruel, dishonest, duplicitous, and manipulative.” There are many great examples to prove his ideology, however, the writing is very subjective and bias as Machiavelli does not give a rebuttal to the different kinds of ruling. He writes “The Prince” after the current leading family of his time falls in order to keep the stability…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ideas that Machiavelli displays are the true ideals of the era, however, the irony and satire surrounding how they are presented are not genuine: ““Any man who tries to be good all the time is bound to come to ruin among the great number who are not good. Hence a prince who wants to keep his authority must learn how not to be good, and use that knowledge, or refrain from using it, as necessity requires” (Machiavelli). Machiavelli is revealing to the reader that in order for a prince to do a good job, he must lie to his subjects in order to be successful. He continues to be ironic and poke fun at the system in play and proves that these thoughts of the prince are not genuine. The beliefs that correspond with those of the era that are presented in The Prince are a strong ruling body in order to maintain social order:“Machiavelli, in the world we have described, often holds qualities like liberality, affability, generosity, courage, sincerity, gravity, and faith, to be of no more or less political value than their opposites, except in communication”(Moore).…

    • 1412 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At face value, The Prince and the Discourses seem to have a conflicting nature, but both texts focus on the administration of a state and present textual similarities. Much of what Machiavelli writes in The Prince reinforces the Discourses, echoing both stylistically and thematically. Machiavelli uses pragmatic methods in both and accentuates the importance of historical studies. In The Prince, there is a significant amount of reference to Cesare Borgia, a man that Machiavelli admires, and he states, “I shall never hesitate to cite Cesare Borgia and his actions,” and his views on virtue and fortune come out of Borgia’s narrative . For Machiavelli, Borgia is the superlative example of a man who can compel any individual to do the distasteful…

    • 1201 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The analysis of Machiavelli as an amoralist – someone who disregards common views of what is right and wrong, unconcerned with morality as a whole (as compared to being immoral, and going against them) – is complicated. A traditional view of morality advocates for not doing wrong or harm to others, for altruism, and kindness. Nowhere in his philosophical work The Prince, first published in 1532, does Machiavelli show any regard for this kind of morality. The Prince is a guidebook for the maintenance of power by a prince (the name he gives to any sovereign); Machiavelli’s sole concern is how to stay in power and best exert it to prolong your rule and prosperity. However, this argument can only be made with a traditional, standard view of morality…

    • 977 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays