Following the letter of the law, as seen when penning a bill of sale for Django while one Speck brother lay dead (and the other about to be killed by the other slaves), Schultz justifies his work as bounty hunter by condemning the illegal actions of others done in the pursuit of money, as seen with his encouragement for Django to shoot Smitty Bacall. Schultz said about Bacall, "... Smitty Bacall wanted to rob stagecoaches, and he didn 't mind killing people to do it…I kill people and sell their corpses for cash. This corpse is worth seven thousand dollars. Now, quit your pussyfooting and shoot him." The irony of this quote seems lost on Schultz, as he himself wanted to make money and “didn’t mind killing people to do it.” The quick delivery of the final line demonstrates his down to business attitude, while his language (specifically ‘corpse’) suggests emotional detachment. Furthermore, the bounty hunter says that he would receive the reward upon handing over the targets dead or alive, but the audience is not show any attempt to capture his targets …show more content…
Why, then, in a movie meant to draw the line clearly between heroes and villians, would Tarantino show a character that steps across that line? Although the movie is not meant to be a serious recount of slavery and all its atrocities—what with its exaggerated violent effects and situational humor—Schultz at the very least serves as a reminder to the audience that the world was not cleanly divided between good and bad just as he believed it to be. ‘Justice’ does not have to be delivered by a Shining Knight on a horse, it could come from anyone: a former slave wearing an outfit reminiscent of Gainsborough’s The Blue Boy or even a hypocritical bounty hunting