Advantages And Disadvantages Of The Revolutionary War

Improved Essays
King George III and the British accumulated a massive debt after the French and Indian war. British assets were depleting at an exponential rate, so Parliament decided to tax the colonists in order to offset their expenses from the war. By reducing the debt from the seven-year war King George’s could reign over the colonies for many years to come. Consequently, Colonists in the 13 states suffered higher expenditures, even imported tea would cost more than usual. All 13 colonies gave consent on paying higher taxes to the British crown, however Boston didn’t consent because they weren’t provided representation so their response was no, but parliament subjected them anyways. Parliament lead their imperial army down a dangerous path which in turn …show more content…
British troops had to face very long distances from home, which was very ineffective in winning the war. Other Factors that were hurtful were irregular sleeping patterns, which drained the troops right before a battle. Poorly nourished and exhausted, they found themselves unable to make sound decisions when need be. During the War British commander’s egos were so inflated that they let America gain the higher ground. On the other hand, British troops were so well trained and equipped their budget was limitless, at any time they could hire foreign troops, which sometimes they called on the Hessians from Germany to help as allies. On the other end, Americans held the home turf, proven themselves before they fight in familiar surroundings which saved many of their troops from death.
Navigating the land quicker meant fewer casualties and more men fight and win. American’s took up arms for freedom and independence. George Washington provided outstanding leadership during the American Revolutionary war which is the greatest reason America prevailed and won. Ellis stated The American Revolution was the central event in Washington’s life, the crucible for his development as a mature man, a prominent statesman and a national hero (Vol 35). Ketchum wrote “His soldiers spoke with awe and pride of Washington’s imperturbability on the battlefield, his absolute lack of fear, his indomitable
…show more content…
After winning their independence America faced a weekend political system that lacked a central government. Articles of Confederation lacked power, but nevertheless, it was a document stating all states were to be treated equally. Articles have been thrown together too quickly and calls for further discussion on a number of issues, including the western lands problem. (Humprey, 94). Major disadvantages of the Articles of Confederation is that they gave no power to tax, no national army, could not even enact laws only merely advise other states on what to do.
Parliament was so fixated on collecting taxes and restructuring that they forgot a very important fundamental, which was take care of your own. Parliament and the British crown abuse their power which would eventually lead them to the destruction of the British empire and ultimately cost King George his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In 1763 Parliament starts to reconstruct its policies with the 13 colonies, this was very controversial to the other states under British control. Evidently After the French and Indian war, the British had accumulated a massive debt with no other choice King George and Parliament decides they must get this money back from the other colonies. By raising taxes, Parliament could assert greater control over the empire as well as temporarily restrict expansion westward in Native American lands. Anyone who didn 't obey the king would be guilty of treason. Parliament drafted up a "Writ of Assistance” which was essentially a glorified search warrant this would prevent trading with the enemy, on the other hand, this was customary in English law, shortly after the Writ of Assistance was introduced, other various forms of taxes are introduced. Coffee, sugar, and wine were subject to higher taxing, this was known as the Sugar Act. Annual Revenue from the Sugar Act would help offset the cost of imperial administration. George Grenville was indifferent about the opinions of the colonists. His major goal was to raise a substantial tax revenue in the colonies. He finally got what he wanted with the Stamp Act of March 1765, the capstone of his imperial program. Parliament pushed too far when they enacted the Quartering Act of (1765), this required colonist to provide food and shelter to British soldiers serving in the colonies. There ratified Americans because it left no room for discussion. Providing food and shelter was extremely cost saving measure for parliament which meant less expenses. An event that would cause havoc to the British empire was the Boston Massacre, which five Bostonian’s died that day to the red coat armies. Many patriots ' lives under King George ruling went lost, however, the Sons of Liberty would capitalize and use the Boston Massacre as a way to gain control over the…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lastly, the British had some disadvantages also. One disadvantage is that it was on foreign land. This factor affected the British because not only did they have to send supplies overseas, they also did not know the terrain so they were easily ambushed. Another disadvantage was that they relied on Hessians as soldiers. The Hessians were not recruited and were payed to fight in this war which drained some of Britain’s money.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    the Parliament insisted that it had the authority to levy direct taxes without seeking approval from the colonial assemblies (2)”. If the colonists were seem as plantations with no legal standing, this would mean the fight against the British, American Revolution, would have no legal standing of the control of the colonists, thus this would mean the war was an irrepressible conflict. Another key note is that the Parliament saw the colonists as plantations, or in other words just people who could produce money to pay off for the war the British were in, which the colonists were not a part of. Overall the colonist were furious and upset for two reasons: the fact the people are seen to produce money, with no human rights, and being taxed with no say, or taxation without representation. Another act, which the Parliament enforced was the “Intolerable…

    • 976 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the Revolution came near the end, Americans decided there needed to be a set of laws in place, for the independence that will be gained if they win the war. The first set of rules to be drafted is known as the Articles of Confederation. Seeing that it was America’s first attempt at a government, it is quite obvious that there were many issues with the rules and provisions created, which caused problems in the new nation and stress among political leaders. The Articles of Confederation caused economic, legislative and leadership problems, along with unrest in the Anti-Federalist Party as shown in Documents A, spoken by Melancton Smith and Document B written by Brutus 1.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After America declared independence from England in 1776, the american founding fathers, worked hard to make a new government run by the people and succeeded when in October 1777, John Dickinson wrote the Articles of Confederation. Their first attempted at federalism was politically weak, born from their horror of a strong central government. It gave the states more power then the federal government (figure 1), creating a weak economy, relating to the fact that the federal government could not require taxes from the states. Consequently, because of lack of unity between state, the the Articles of Confederation also weakened America’s foreign policy, as each state made separate treaties with other nations. Politically, economically and nationally,…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After the Revolutionary War, the thirteen colonies needed a government to replace the British system they overthrew. The Founding Fathers drafted the Articles of Confederation. The articles were briefly used until citizens began to see its shortcomings. It was just a “firm league of friendship.” I will discuss some of the weaknesses in the Articles of the Confederation which were changed and some weaknesses in the United States Constitution.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation, ratified by all thirteen states on March 1, 1781, did not provide the United States with an effective government. In order to determine exactly how ineffective this government was, we need to look deeper into the economic, political, and ideological aspects that the Articles of Confederation presented at that time. Economically, the Articles of Confederation left Congress with no power to regulate commerce, which resulted in the states being able to establish laws regarding tariffs and navigation laws. Politically, the Articles of Confederation left the United States with a weak central government, and no executive branch. Ideologically, the Articles of Confederation was an attempt to bridge the trust between the people and the national government. Thus, the Articles of Confederation did, to a great extent, not make an effective government in the United States.…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The American Revolution was a long hard fought war for freedom and liberty, which brought The United States of America together in an individual way. The taxation in England was becoming unbearable, as was the lack of colonial representation. King George began to tax the colonies for a war they had not been directly involved with, much less volunteered too. This war was the French-Indian War, and it brought England into a debt that were not prepared for. England began to tax the colonies, who had no voice within parliament, with an extreme multitude. King George III put The Sugar Act and The Stamp Act into action, and within the next year they both were repealed due to boycotting and the colonists ignoring the taxes. Boston was the root of…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Washington was a great leader for the Continental Army, and “the chief symbol for resistance to British rule” (19). During this time he sent letters to congress and state legislature to get things done. He disliked the Articles of Confederation and made it no secret “that the Articles were a recipe for anarchy in postwar America…” (27). Washington realized the only way to keep America united was to replace the war with a common bond. He worked to define a goal for America, that was to explore the west; this is known as the Manifest…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    King George Dbq

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages

    “The British government endeavored to reign in the American colonies by reforming the colonial government and increasing colonial taxes (which were significantly lower than the taxes paid by those who lived in England). The new taxes were aimed at reducing Great Britain's postwar debt and shifting a greater part of the cost of North America's defense to the colonists. George supported and encouraged these changes. He believed the colonies were economic satellites of Britain, and Parliament had unquestioned authority to tax and…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Daniel Shay Rebellion

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages

    During King George the third rule in the colonies, there were a lot of things going wrong. Such as equality. After the French and Indian war, Britain was left with no money so, to make money faster King George the third started passing taxes. These taxes were being voted for in Britain and then the colonies who had no say were…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Articles of Confederation’s first flaw is that it did not give congress hardly any power. For a country to run properly and fairly, it needs to have a strong central government. When the government is not given enough power, States start to branch off and try to be…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With no power to levy nor enforce taxes, the federal government were struggling to accumulate a national budget. This particular point really emphasize the defects of central government and presented its inconsistency. The general legislative branch with only thirteen members prove to be an inefficient elements. The limit upon votes, regardless of size, concluded in long delays and simple no results. Problems over having only one branch of government, the legislature, averted to the issue of lacking both a solid leader and national judiciary court. Without these keystone structure the congress proved to be in a disadvantage. Overall with no uniform systems upon each state, truly portrays disorganization rather than unity. These attributes established the weakness within the Articles of Confederation thus needed to be replaced. The Articles contributed to a ineffective, inconsistent, and weakness of a early central institution. Neglecting the faults of the Articles of Confederation, it became one of the major steppingstone which progressed America to the…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    King George III was abusing his power ,and demanded to much money from the American colonists ,therefore, this outraged them. Therefore, they tried expressing their discontent by writing letters to him, expressing their disapproval of being taxed without their consent. However, King George didn’t care for the colonists needs “most of these letters were simply tossed aside, or sent to the waste bin. Almost none of them were actually read.” (Pavao, 2010). Furthermore, King George III was unreasonable ,for he knew that he angered the American colonists ,but he did nothing to try ,and fix it after the colonists took a nonviolent way to approach him with their needs. Not only did he tax them ,but he didn’t give the colonists a say in the important decisions ;thus they didn’t have a voice in Parliament. The lack of representation in parliament was one of the main reasons that the colonists rebelled.It was one of the many rights Great Britain took away from the colonists. Therefore, the colonists “raised the issue of taxation without representation.” (Bos, 2013). In addition, the colonists had every right to rebel ,and argue after everything they went…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The evident solution in Great Britain’s eyes was to impose direct taxes on items such as printed materials, tea, glass, sugar, and more. By doing this, Britain was regaining the money spent on the French and Indian War rapidly. They justified their actions to the colonies by stating that most of the money spent on the war was in effort to protect the colonies and ensure the colonists safety. The colonists complained so often and incessantly, that it left Britain with no other choice but to repeal many of the taxes passed. However, The King refused to repeal the taxation on tea, forcing the colonists to act violently. The taxation on tea was repealed, but not without a series of new regulations to assist in ceasing colonists resistance against British rule. The taxes passed without consent by Great Britain were a clear representation of a gross over-powerment in The King. Taxes passed without the consent of the people they will affect cannot be…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics