Christian Existentialism Analysis

Good Essays
The worldview of existentialism is a polar opposite of Christianity. To find meaning with existentialism is impossible. It is also impossible to explain the nature of humanity or the nature of reality. The only logical and practical way to explain the nature of humanity and reality is through scripture and the existence of God.
The world is a cruel and unforgiving place. To many it is their destiny to find meaning in this world, by any means necessary. However, existentialists believe that there is no meaning to life and that we are all just born to die. They live their lives in complete freedom of choice and emphasize the individual. People make decisions based on what matters to them and not what is rational. The focus question of existentialists
…show more content…
This may seem like a contradictory name, but demonstrates both sides to this view. Those who believe in Christian Existentialism believe that the focus should not be on our own reason, but should be more focused on faith of God over intellect or philosophy. They surrender themselves fully to God. Christian Existentialism relates to Existentialism in the way that there is only one way to find meaning. In Christian Existentialism meaning is found only in faith and nothing else. Existentialism focuses on choice to find meaning and nothing else. Neither of them can explain the existence of humanity, but strive to make the most of what they have of this world. They seem like polar opposites, but hold to the same values of finding meaning in one idea. Both still find that all this life is, is being born to die. An additional form of existentialism is Absurdism. Absurdism is the view that humanity must live in a world that is and will be hostile or apathetic towards them. The universe will never care for humanity as the way many want it to. People then fill that void with made up gods and create stories to satisfy their needs in this world. Absurdism is very similar to existentialism, but is not the same. Absurdism focuses on a specific idea that is not essentially an existential …show more content…
They hold to an extremely skeptical view that nothing in this world has a real existence. I true Nihilist would have believe in nothing, have no loyalties, and no purpose other than to destroy. Both Absurdism and Nihilism are closely related to Existentialism. All three hold to the views that this world is meaningless, unless you do what you want, believe on nothing, and reject any religious groups. Also the worldviews agree that nothing can explain the existence of humanity or for what purpose humanity was made. From a Christian worldview existentialism seems to be a depressing and incorrect way to live your life. Nonetheless, there is still some truth in existentialism. This truth lies in the fact that they believe that you can chose what you want to do when you want to do it. Basically, they agree with the statement of free will. Some Christians and all Existentialists believe that we make our own decisions. God or other divine forces do not decide what our lives are going to look like and have it all planned out. We chose for

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Doctrine Of Justification

    • 2608 Words
    • 11 Pages

    We are not saved by the good works we do, or the actions that we take, but rather through our faith in Jesus Christ to freely redeem us. Sproul indicates, “His grace was making available to those who would receive it passively, not those who would achieve it actively, but that would receive it by faith, and by which a person could be reconciled to a holy and righteous God (Sproul, 2016). Luther understood that nothing we could do would earn our justification. On our own we are incapable of ever earning it and this is what Paul is getting at in Romans. We are saved, not because we deserve it, but rather because God wants us to be and gives us the gift of his grace freely.…

    • 2608 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Luther’s second argument he states that no amount of good deeds can produce freedom to soul, only those who have faith in the holy word of God can free their soul. To support the argument that Martin Luther makes we will look closely at one of Martin Luther’s treaties The Freedom of a Christian. This treatise was supposed to be a sign of good faith to show the Pope that there were no hard feelings but “in the eyes of many it became a classic document of liberation” (Marty 63). In his treatise Martin Luther denounces the argument made by Erasmus that good works could lead to salvation or righteousness. He states in this treatise that “in every person there are two natures-one that is of the spirit and one that is of the body” (Lull Russell…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    T- Humans have no free will because they are forever sinful, U/L/I- Humans can’t decide if they are saved or not, if they’re not saved they’re not saved,P-Even if a believer turns from God they will get into heaven, but when a believer feels they are one of the saved ones it makes them want to live a Godly life. Although the theologians have many different ideas on free will they do both agree on the fact that God has the final say on whether someone gets into heaven, God is sovereign and that there is actually an…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hence there is no way to know reality behind the empirical world. A natural consequence is the complete negation of knowledge of God. To Ayer, even the word God or a transcendental being was meaningless because it was not definitional. This is worse than traditional agnosticism, which at least, tried to figure out the existence of God. To agnostics such as Ayer or Wittgenstein, even though one may experience God, such experience is inexpressible.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although the movement was supposed to save Christianity, it actually obliterates Christianity by following a set of completely different fundamental notions. In my opinion, Liberals base their faith on subjectivity by using human mind to infer the accuracy of the Bible or Jesus. To them, nothing is sacred and everything can be changed and viewed differently depending on the current beliefs, experimentations, and discoveries. By having this attitude, Liberals shift the direction of faith from being sacred and permanent to being earthly and temporary. I strongly disagree with this practice as I believe that Christianity is not just faith, but a way of life in which we should follow and respect everything it has to…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Two interesting figures that I have come across during my readings were the reformer Luther and the monk Pelagius. Each one held their own opinion in regard to the Christian faith, and they would not yield easily to the beliefs of others. What struck me most about Luther was his extreme focus on having faith in God, and his lack of concern for people performing good deeds. As for Pelagius, he has an intriguing take on original sin and on the choices that humans make through the power of free will. What draws me to these two theologians and their beliefs is that they take a different stance on traditional Christian faith, and they are not afraid to tell people about their ideas because they truly believe them.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    for betterment of one’s well being, ethics should be applied into their lives, situation ethics was created from Christian context, which says that there are no universal rules on right or wrong as each case depends on situation and it deserves a unique solution. Situation ethics rejects the idea of prefabricated decision and perspective rules. Hence it teaches people that ethical decisions should follow flexible guidelines rather than absolute rules and should be taken on case by case basis. .Chuck colson’s conclusion on moral absolutes Chuck colson says there is a real difference in knowng the right thing and doing a right thing. As Christians we always talk about the Christian moral values, but how we can ensure that our beliefs and leading to virtuous behavior in…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    God was and is not a puppet master. I believe we were put on earth to make our own choices on whether or not to follow God. I believe God knows in the end what we choose but I do not believe he makes that choice for us. I believe that because humans and Christians have free will we are able to be in control of our actions. We sin because we have the ability to perform actions God does not approve of.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For, true faith occurs when the belief in question is known to be false. But Kierkegaard’s God is neither imperfect nor perfect like that of Hume, or lawless like that of Dostoevsky. Rather he is simply vague—a concept to which we assign a name. Acknowledging this opacity allows Kierkegaard to almost, if not entirely ignore the matter of evil. Presumably, his conclusion may be that because God does not exist and all we have control over is whether or not we choose to believe, we need not justify the role of suffering since there is no protective force watching over…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    A saying expressed in the music could be God speaking, “Nothing that formed against me shall stand” (Chris Tomlin). This song lyric is referencing God in that He is omnipotent, omniscient and omnipresent and that nothing or nobody will conquer Him. These words relate to the Christian culture because followers of the faith are supposed to believe this notion and are one of the main reasons why they consider themselves Christian. An example that the lyrics could be contrasting to could be Satan. The idea of the devil having precedence over God is a boundary and belief that should not be crossed by Christians.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays