Ira Berlin The Long Emancipation Analysis

Improved Essays
Ira Berlin’s, “The Long Emancipation,” entails the truths and evidence that the abolishment of slavery was nothing near a swift and easy task as it had traditionally been assumed. She describes the struggles black Americans had to face in their fight for freedom, and what they had to endure throughout the struggle for emancipation. In addition, Berlin explains how black Americans found a means to prosper in their own way, despite all odds being against them in America. Ira Berlin counter-argues the idea that emancipation was quick and simple, explains the use of Revolutionary ideas in the struggle for abolition and securing a black culture in white society, and how these ideas stirred conflict between black Americans and white Americans.
Ira
…show more content…
Slave-owners did not believe black Americans had the right to be independent, be granted citizenship or equal rights, and did not want abolitionists sacrificing their top class in society. However, it was their Bible and Declaration of Independence that the black abolitionists reasoned and supported their claims with. The use of Revolutionary ideas by black abolitionists put all white slave-owners in a situation of hypocrisy. The same ideals of freedom, independence, that all men are created equal and have certain inalienable rights, were the ones used by colonists, many of them slaveholders, to fight for their removal from Britain. This strategy put slaveholders in a tough position and made their counter-arguments almost invalid, but they refused to let abolitionists win that easily and would hold out their ideas that slavery was necessary and that abolition would ruin America. Ira Berlin’s, “The Long Emancipation,” describes the true struggles that black Americans faced in their war for freedom. She details the ideology used by abolitionists, specifically referencing their strong use of Revolutionary era concepts. As well as, mentioning their failures, and small victories, that led the way to black Americans creating a place for themselves in

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He thought it was morally wrong and evil, but he had to put up with it because if the slaves were freed there would be a gigantic uproar, that would tear America apart. This made it impossible for Lincoln to be an abolitionist. But, in the years leading up to the Civil War, and during the Civil War,…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It was going to take conflict and battles in order to tear slavery from the roots of the country. The abolishment of slavery came from a undefined unitement between the blacks and whites and moral agreement that slavery was not right. Though usually they never spoke or planned with each other, but by their natural feelings of what’s right and wrong, people, both black and white, worked together to end slavery. It wasn’t done by slavery just being kicked out the door, it was done by a united undermining of the slave trade. The abolitionists made slave owning so difficult and none worthwhile that it became not worth while to most owners to keep slaves anymore.…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    America is punishing innocent people with “endless, hopeless slavery.” They have done nothing to deserve this treatment, but America is forcing them to work their entire life for someone else and to endure countless painful experiences when they don’t perform their job as well their masters wish them to. George Tucker also comments on the fact that slaves should be freed. Some people believe that blacks are advancing in their knowledge at a “pace equal to our own,” but “they are likely to advance much faster.” They realize that they are equals to white people and deserve their rights, but they are being oppressed. They are smart enough to realize that when war occurs and someone offers them their freedom, then they will take it. The Constitution needs to be changed so blacks are free and have land of their own if…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He took the common arguments made by slave owners as well as their sympathizers and revealed the flaws in their logic. One such argument was that slaves were socially deficient. Rush argued that they appeared to be socially deficient because they are trapped in a state of slavery and not their natural social environment back in Africa. Another common argument that was commonly made was that the actual color of their skin was enough of a distinction to justify unequal treatment. Rush thought this was a ludicrous argument, “The vulgar notion of their being descended from Cain, who was supposed to have been marked with this color, is too absurd to need a refutation.” This was a common issue that most could not get past due to the very clear difference it established between the appearances of whites and blacks.…

    • 1837 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (1)” Stephens believed that Union wants to topple the natural order which places Negro as subordinates and slave to white people. He assumed that Black people position is naturally imposed, and they cannot have the rights and privileges like white man. Along with Stephen many people in the south believed that, the state economy depended on slave labor; and by ending slavery it would bring disaster in their economy. People in the south did not wanted slavery to end, and these people were his audience while he was delivering the speech, so he said what the people wanted to hear and thus they supported…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He discusses that what an individual should do, is put themselves in the shoes of the slaves and advocate for their just treatment, which is what abolitionists do. However, abolitionists are broken up into multiple groups: the Republican Party, the Garrison, and Radical abolitionists. The Republican party sought for confinement of slavery within slave states, otherwise known as constitutional limits (258). However, Douglas does not agree with this because it still provides slave owners with the constitutional right to hold slave and do injustices onto them. Even though they hate slavery, they do not advocate total abolishment is necessary, believing slavery will die out on its own.…

    • 590 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He is correct to say that the South is not alone in its sin against Blacks. The North was indeed responsible as well. However, as Tindall and Shi point out slavery was the main reason for war. They state, “To argue that the Civil War was primarily a defense of liberty and the right of self-government…ignores the actual reasons that southern leaders used in 1860–1861 to justify secession and war” (Tindall and Shi 497). The leaders of the south wanted to keep slavery and they went to war over it.…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Slavery was one of the biggest controversies in world history, and was argued both for and against fiercely. Defenders of slavery attempted to outwardly justify their actions and abolitionists fought against them with the same ferocity. I pray that we will never again begin nationally practicing something as horrible as…

    • 425 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the time countries were still into slavery and the African American had no rights. The issue will further lead onto the fight for freedom, which America is very famously known for. The Civil War resulted due to slave rights and emancipating the slaves. Huckleberry Finn just shows the previous struggles. It was the struggle of separation and being sold and not having a home.…

    • 2061 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After all, who would work the plantations if African slaves could become wage earners like many white laborers? Certainly, an egalitarian society was not in the most profitable interests of white slave owners, especially in the eyes of southern commissioners that argued in favor of secession to combat the federalist ploys to end slavery: “The impending imposition of racial equality informed speeches of other commissioners as well, [especially in the case of] Thomas J. Wharton, Mississippi’s attorney general and the state’s commissioner to Tennessee (Dew 56). In this manner, commissioners in the Deep South viewed the northern federalist government as a threat to the southern way of life, which always revolved around the…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays