A Tale Of Two Cities Non-Violence Analysis

Improved Essays
Using Violence to Overcome Oppression When it comes to fighting for justice or against oppression, people will resort to either violence or nonviolence. Both, however, have their consequences and fair shares throughout history. The way violence or nonviolence is used can be different to many people. However, when fighting against oppression, or mistreatment, it's important to take action and fight for equal treatment. That’s why violence should be used, to fight for what's right. Non-violence can’t be beneficial all the time. Gandhi was an anti-violence protester who fought for India’s Independence in . He, of course, used non-violence among with various other people to make India independent from Great Britain. This later influenced many …show more content…
For example, the French Revolution, which was an era where the third estate rebelled against the rich and included violence, brought rise and acknowledgement to what they wanted. “When the people itself is corrupted, Liberty is already lost” (Robespierre 1). Due to the violence brought upon there was quick action being taken, to fight for what the lower class people wanted. This quickly spread and acknowledge more people to take action. In the novel A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens, which is a historical fiction writing, shows the French Revolution progression in the background. The Defarges along with a great amount of lower class people to planning and action to get away from oppression:”Patriots and friend, we are ready! The Bastille!” (Dickens 150). The people in France stormed the Bastille, a prison, to show their hatred toward their form of government. This action symbolized the start of the revolution, which lasted for about 10 years. This also leads to the oppressed overcoming oppression much quicker and having some control. As Robespierre said in his speech entitled “Justification of the Use of Terror”,“The royalists … are only strangers or, rather, enemies”. Robespierre tells how the royalists are nothing to them. Thus, they go ahead on using violence and start a revolution to aid the lower classes that will eventually help them overcome oppression. This also was used in the American Revolution, where the 13 colonies wanted their independence from the king of Great Britain to overcome oppression. As a result, they made a statement known as the “Declaration of Independence”, which told the king that they are no longer under their ruling and will go to war with them to get their independence. “King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations…” (Jefferson 1). The 13 colonies of America preceded the use of

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    DBQ How would you feel if you weren’t allowed to eat at certain restaurants ,or even drink out of certain water fountains? You wouldn't feel like you had freedom would you? All three men fought against unjust laws to get the civil rights they also all fought peacefully they did not use any violence and fought for their right n boycott marches . All three men also accepted jail time without any hesitation because they knew they were fighting for their freedom. Breaking laws allowed nonviolence to work.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article “Speech at The March On Washington” by Josephine Baker and “Letter From Birmingham Jail” by Martin Luther King Jr. both argue about discrimination and making a solution with non-violence such as protesting. To achieve true freedom, you must practice non-violence in order to protect your rights. To begin with, in order to achieve true freedom one must protest peacefully. According to the text “Letter from Birmingham Jail” Baker states “We must come to see that, as the federal courts have consistently affirmed it is wrong to urge individual cease his efforts to gain his basic constitutional rights because the quest many precipitate, it is. “This evidence is valid and relevant because they realize what was wrong and there should be certain rights.…

    • 548 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fight for independence was defiantly not one of simplicity, but one of great distress, hardship, and catastrophe to bring liberty among the American colonies. Outstanding efforts by colonist and their leaders proved that the decision to gain freedom from Britain led to what is now an independent country governed by the citizens of the United States. In The Speech at the Virginia Convention, Patrick Henry addresses the leaders of the community that the issues with Britain should not be taken peacefully but that the colonist should prepare for war if their needs are not met. Alongside, The Declaration of Independence by Thomas Jefferson states the colonies reasons to separate with Britain and declare war for their independence. Conclusively,…

    • 1512 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Todd May wrote the article “Is American Nonviolence Possible?” to address the growing epidemic of violent crimes and actions across the United States. Mays opens the article with specific examples of very violent events to set the situation to which he is responding so that the reader feels the need for what Mays is explaining in this article. Mays introduces the issue with a rhetorical question, and poses many of these throughout the article so that the audience asks the questions to themselves as they read his stance on how America needs to evaluate how much violence occurs in our nation. The author effectively appeals to the logical feelings of the American people, as well as invokes their emotions into feeling that a change needs to come…

    • 1286 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Non Violence Essay

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Non-violence is a peaceful way to evoke social and political change. Three cases where non-violence worked were in the countries of India, the United States, and South Africa where people felt they were being treated unjust. Gandhi, King, and Mandela all used non-violence, what made it work? Nonviolence is the practice of refraining from the use of violence when protesting against oppression. The use of non-violence by Gandhi, King, and Mandela worked because they were strong leaders who were able to unify people and used effective methods when protesting.…

    • 668 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cesar Chavez, a labor union organizer and civil rights leader once said “We are also convinced that nonviolence is more powerful than violence” (lines 12-13). During the 19th century, Dr.Martin Luther King proved that nonviolence was stronger than violence. On the 10th anniversary of King’s death, Chavez wrote an article to support King’s view on nonviolence by using diction, repetition, and emotional appeals. Chavez’s article argues that non violent protest is more efficient than violent means. His words appeal and connect to people emotionally, “We can gather the support of millions who have a conscience...”…

    • 552 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cesar Chavez Violence

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    At any given moment and location, a conflict is occurring, whether it be a protest, a movement, or even a war. During the 1960’s and 1970’s, the world was slowly but surely progressing through a turbulent era, which included the farm workers’ movement that Cesar Chavez was a part of. Oftentimes, people who are a part of or are just watching a movement and conflict unfold, claim that violence is the best way to get a swift, immediate, and definite result over nonviolence. Violence may be the best way to solve a situation, but is it the most effective and safest way to do so? Although resorting to violence in certain situations is necessary, Cesar Chavez, who published an article in the magazine of a religious organization, effectively argues…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indians, South Africans, and African Americans gain their freedom in numerous ways that are inspirational to the current generation who are slowly reliving the history. Indian and South Africans had to gain their freedom from foreigners in their country. African Americans had freedom in their country but did not have equal respect or equal freedom as Whites in United States. Indians, South Africans, and African Americans had similar struggles for their freedom in their country. They all went through discrimination in their country.…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    As the Revolution gained more power, its leaders became more paranoid. In 1793, Maximilien Robespierre, who had assumed most of the power in France, declared that a reign of terror would begin. During this period of time, the French government’s first priority was keeping the Revolution safe from people who wanted…

    • 1097 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Violence as a way of achieving racial justice is both impractical and immoral. It is impartial because it is a descending spiral ending in destruction for all…” I strongly agree with this quote said by Martin Luther King Jr. Violence is a very concerning issue in the past, present and certainly in the film “Do The Right Thing”. It is my personal belief that you cannot achieve anything by violence and that it only brings major unwanted consequences into our lives. The film “Do The Right Thing” illustrates the difference between violence and counter-violence and the diverse consequences they each convey. Violence is the act of physical force toward someone to hurt them and in cases kill them, in order to gain power.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robespierre spoke on February 5, 1794 to inspire the crowds of the revolution to eliminate the internal threats, which included spies and anyone who spoke of counter revolutionary thoughts. Robespierre expressed the idea that royalists were not enemies, but simply strangers that needed to be stopped for the safety of everyone. He also speaks of the peaceful times that will come after this happens and after the revolution is over (Doc G). The translation of Robespierre’s speech waters down to by eliminating the spies and royalists, the public would be safer and all threats against the revolution would be abolished inside of France. Unfortunately, Robespierre was too driven by power and fear, he was executed for using his power the wrong way.…

    • 731 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There is a distinct difference between the violence of the oppressed and the violence of the oppressor. Consider World War II, the violent actions of Nazi Germany (the oppressor) towards the Jewish people (the oppressed) are deemed incorrigible while violent actions with the goal of saving the Jewish people were fundamentally encouraged. Therefore, while violence may not always be justifiable it can be a means to an end. The justification of violence in the context of revolutions can also be approached from a utilitarian perspective; wherein the ends justify the means.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Then on July 14th, 1789 a group of rioters stormed the Bastille fortress hoping to capture arms and ammunition ("French Revolution."). This is a key difference between the American and French revolutions, as the French revolution was kicked off by the peasants starting the first acts of violence, while in America it was British soldiers that started the violence which only enraged the American populace even more. After the storming of Bastille the people of France were suddenly in a state of hysteria and revolutionary fervor ("French Revolution."). Thus began “The Great Fear” which was a period of time where the peasants of France were known to riot, loot, and burn the property of anyone who was above them in the status…

    • 2394 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nonviolent Resistance

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Many individuals think that the most successful way to resist opposition is through violence. In Maria Stephan and Erica Chenoweth’s article, Why Civil Resistance Works, they challenge the view of violence being the most effective form of opposition. Their main argument is that nonviolent resistances’ are more successful. They state, “…nonviolent resistance is a forceful alternative to political violence that can pose effective challenges to democratic and non-democratic opponents and at times can do so more effectively than violent resistance” (Stephan and Chenoweth, 9). Nonviolence resistances are civilian based methods to wage conflict through nonviolent means.…

    • 874 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The existentialist philosophers wrote largely about the negative side of humanity. Their focus on the negative aspects of human life and human consciousness led to a philosophy centered on war, suffering, and violence. This focus on violence remains when they discuss the French colonization of Algeria. The existentialist philosophers Simone de Beauvoir, Frantz Fanon, and Jean-Paul Sartre all believe that violence is the only means of casting off the chains of colonial oppression. Although they are correct in this assertion, they fail to recognize the full implications of this claim, namely, the promise of future violence and the impossibility of lasting peace.…

    • 956 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays