Why Do People Obey Authority Order

Improved Essays
Obeying an Authority Figure Isn’t Always the Best Decision
Why do individuals follow an authority figures’ instructions if it meant possibly harming another person? This situation was tested in the Milgram experiment to get a better understanding of why the Nazi’s followed orders that resulted in killing thousands of Germans during the Holocaust. In most cases, people would not harm another individual, but it’s an authority figure who is giving the commands so it is hard to say “no”. People obey authority in unfamiliar circumstances when others could be harmed because they think the authority figure is legitimate, morally right and that the authority figure will take responsibility. Though it is a norm to follow authority figures orders, it
…show more content…
Did the people during the Holocaust kill people for some of the same reasons that the teachers shocked participants in the Milgram Experiment? I would disagree that the two are similar circumstances. During the Holocaust, the Nazi’s followed their commanders orders because they didn’t know any better. But the relationship of the Milgram experiment and the Holocaust vary in a number of important ways. First, the Milgram experiment lasted for an hour or so and the Holocaust last for many years. Second, the men in the Milgram experiment didn’t know each other and were paid for participating in the experiment and the German people who killed the Jews in the Holocaust felt they were superior to the Jewish people. Finally, the people in the Milgram experiment were told that the learner would have no permanent effects from the shocks and the Germans were well aware that they were killing the Jews. In fact, Germans would have the opportunity for years to come to live with the fact that they had killed another human being. This is much different than the Milgram Experiment where it was clear that the participants would not be harmed in any

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After conducting an experiment which tested several subjects’ abilities to resist authority, Stanley Milgram came to the conclusion that acts of evil are not conducted by sadistic humans, but obedient ones. This concept, known as the banality of evil, was introduced in Hannah Arendt’s Eichmann in Jerusalem and can be traced to the Nuremburg Trials, in which Nazi Germans killed millions of Jews based on the orders that they were told to follow. In the experiment, subjects were told to send a series of shocks to a patient, with each shock containing increasingly more voltage. Milgram found that most subjects were willing to shock the patients despite hearing cries of agony, either because the subjects allowed responsibility to be placed on the…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many agree that the Milgram experiment could not be reproduced today due to its circumstances. According to Chapter 1 in the book, concealing the true intent of an experiment is entirely ethical in psychological research for the sake of experimental validity. The experimenter’s lie that the experiment was about the effects of punishment on learning rather than compliance to obedience is perfectly fine, since the results might not have been as accurate otherwise. The real issue comes with the emotional trauma that the experiment could cause to its participants. The mental damage that comes from knowing that you are capable of such horrible things just because someone told you to do them is quite a glaring issue in the experiment.…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The primary purpose of the Milgram's obedience/electroshock experiment was to test people's obedience to authority. I feel the test was able to fulfill its objectives. It was successful because it should that the majority of people tested were willing to fully accept, with some reservations, what a authority figure instructed them to do. In The Real World by Ferris and Stein (2008), we are told that to conducted the experiment a system was set were a research subject was assigned being a teacher and then two others who were administering the test would join, one as experimenter, the other as a learner. The teacher was then shown the learner being strapped to a chair and electrodes being attracted to there body.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    He points out that Milgram’s results were not published or well-known until he established the connection between the Holocaust and his experiment. It is evident that Parker believes Milgram does this simply to gain popularity for his…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Professor Blackmon, Those are two very good questions! In the 1960’s there were many unanswered questions in the field sociology, which was still growing into what it has become today. The curiosity of Stanley Milgram led to some questionable decisions in the name of research that provided some very intriguing results regarding authority and obedience. In a world constantly in fear of a third world war and mass atrocities are still being carried out at the hands of dangerous dictators, over fifty years ago Milgram tried to help prevent such a future with a better understanding of his research.…

    • 268 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people have the idea that during WW1 Nazis killed and tortured many Jews freely and even willingly. What Milgram is doing in his experiment is trying to figure out how easily people follow orders, orders that could harm and potentially kill someone. Milgram got participants through a newspaper article, and paying them $450 to complete the experiment (random sampling). The experiment was carried out in a lab at Yale, causing ecological validity to be good, as it 's a very trustworthy institution and subjects are more likely to abide when in a laboratory compared to a real world setting. He was using a deceiving method by tricking the “teacher” to believe that every time he flipped a set of 30 switches, which were ranged from Slight Shock…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dehumanization Human beings love to search for the meaning behind everything because once meaning is found, then justification and rationalization can be given. Genocide is a very complex term, but the act of genocide itself is unfathomable. People always want a reason for why presidents or dictators allow genocide to happen, and the only option that can make everything clear is that human evil must have developed. Although human evil provides an explanation, there is something true about human evil.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mind Tyrant Analysis

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages

    THE MEANING OF ETHICS: 1. Describe mind tyrants and explain their significance to the study of ethics. Identify two original examples of mind tyrants. Mind tyrants are an individual’s thoughts and ideas that are influenced by customs, traditions, and social norms. These tyrants play a vital role in establishing what one might believe is right, wrong, good, or bad.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Many scientists such as Stanley Milgram, Erich Fromm, Lee Ross and Richard E. Nisbett have tested their theory of obedience to authority. Their findings might frighten people on how obedient people are and what the sick and twisted things people will do. An example of obedience to authority is the writing of this paper for Doctor Campbell, if not done properly with obedience the grade of the student will plummet. Another example of people listening to orders given by an authoritarian person that inflicted pain, suffering, and even death is the Holocaust; the Holocaust was set up by Adolf Hitler and Nazi officers in concentration camps. The Nazi officers were told to run these concentration camps filled with innocent people and to exterminate…

    • 1478 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sleepless nights, endless notes, and immeasurable amounts of stress, are results from my endeavorous attempts to shine through all of the stereotypes placed upon myself as a young African American female striving to success. I am expected to be average, attend wild parties, take part in illegal activities, and disobey authorities, in which most of my generation does just that. In utter exaggeration, I stand to completely nullify such a teen as described above. I choose to conduct myself in such a manner that would make my grandma smile. Obeying authority is a quality I feel is essential to being an intelligent human being, as we should all pay one another the respect we’d appreciate being given to us.…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Disadvantages Of Obedience

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages

    According to Dictionary.com obedience is to comply “with an order, request or law or submission to another’s authority.” Obedience is a component in social behavior and everyday life. However, there are different forms of obedience such as blind obedience. This is where an individual follows direction without any question or moral perspective without knowing they are causing harm. Such form of obedience can be hostile and perilous to the people involved.…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays