Karl Popper's Concept Of An Open Society Summary

In the collection of essays, In Search of a Better World, Karl Popper, in which he is most know for rejecting the scientific method, embraces the idea of empirical science. His disagreement stemmed from the notion that science can never be proven, but it may be falsified. These ideas are reflection of previous noted philosophers such as Plato and Socrates with respect to academics, which are expanded upon and are implemented in today’s science society. Popper also explains the concept of an “open society” and its’ relationship with science in order for scientific theories to be valid.

In order to appreciate Popper’s view and support for the Socratic methods of thinking regarding academia, one must first understand the definition of both. Dating …show more content…
An open society is what Popper believes, associated with cultural and religious diversities, is what continues to challenge the mind because the quest for knowledge is never completed and can be said that learning is an ongoing process. Popper explores the idea of remaining human by suggesting that a journeying to the unknown and uncertainty in an open society will be the only way to identify with humans. An open society is beneficial for the simple fact that we can learn from anyone and will be continuing to learn from people and things around us. We should be open minded to the idea of an open society with respect to the opportunities of discovery that can be taken from those in this type of society. Open societies help us acquire unbiased information in order to determine if theories are sound be gathering information, opinions and data in order to make a concrete fact. By doing so, intellectuals are decreasing the percentage of …show more content…
Whether it is setbacks or celebrations these types of events help shape a person into who they are in the present. Mistakes are essential for the growth and learning process therefore as you learn more and mature, many things in life become an easier for you to grasp. I do agree with Popper for rejection of the “Philosopher King.” Because no one on earth knows everything, not even powerful individuals such as kings and presidents. Humans are disposed to mistakes because we are humans are not born perfect. Science I think is an evolving truth, yet a theory is proposed, in which they can fully be rejected and others only part of it is rejected which adds conflict to the notion. Still, solidifying theories is a learning and discovery process. If knowledge surpasses a theory, it does not mean it was not completely valid, it just means it was time to develop a newer cutting edge theory, with less reject able ideas. Theories are made by human experimentation, which always has some fallacies. Also when knowledge is further explored, new material can shift ideas into new directions. The open society is a blessing for the future because it encourages growth and a peaceful cooperation of people. There may be arguments, but through discussion, these differences can be worked out and stronger relationships may build, which further