5th Amendment: Salinas V. Texas Court Case

Improved Essays
Do I think the 5th Amendment protects someone’s refusal to answer police questions when he hasn’t been arrested or read his rights?

In my opinion, no, the 5th Amendment does not protect you from questioning. The judges over the Salinas v. Texas court case decided that the 5th Amendment's advantage against self-incrimination doesn’t work for people who just decide to silence themselves while being questioned. You have to claim your 5th amendment right to be able to use it. That way, the authorities know what your intentions are and has notice enough to decide to either argue that point or give the immunity. The only exceptions to this is that the defendant did not have to take the stand during trial or failure to claim this advantage was due

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation is a constitutional legal code that protects the rights of a citizen that is ensured in the Bill of Rights. It has been used in numerous cases throughout time to remind everyone that every citizen’s rights are protected. Some cases include Town of Greece v. Galloway, McDonald v. Chicago, Benton v. Maryland, and Atkins v. Virginia. In these cases, multiple people were tried for what were misunderstood as wrongdoings. Selective Incorporation is used widely in the judicial branch by judges and the jury to determine a verdict.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    QUESTION PRESENTED 

 Whether Kaleigh Cyprus committed transfer intent with respect to Jack pursuant to A.R.S. section 13-203(B)(1) and State v. Ramirez . The phone was thrown towards another person involve, identified as Helena. In result it ended up hitting Jack BRIEF ANSWER 

 Yes, Kaleigh did commit assault because her intention was to throw the phone to Helena and with respect to Jack, she was not intentionally throwing the phone at him. Since Jack ended up sitting in that location and turning his head it resulted in the phone hitting him.…

    • 772 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Texas vs. Johnson (An analysis of the supreme court case Texas vs. Johnson and the current repercussions of the decision) The first amendment protects many of our basic rights such as freedom of speech, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. The framers of our constitution left a broad wording to leave room for our country to grow and change as time went on. One of the adjustments our country has made over time is to define the actions and words protected under the freedom of speech. There are three basic categories of free speech; pure speech, is communication only through words, speech plus is speech plus an aid such as a sign or a chant, and symbolic speech, an action that communicates meaning without the use of words.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Fifth Amendment says that no one can be accused of a crime unless a grand jury decides that there is enough evidence to charge a person for a crime in court. The defendant has a choice to testify or not to testify. If they choose to testify, the defendant loses his Fifth Amendment privilege and must answer the questions asked. However, at the trial the defendant who has been called to the witness stand by the grand jury can refuse to answer certain…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The fifth amendment is part of the bill of rights in which each amendment specifies not only our rights but our protections against the government when needed. It is stated within the amendment that “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury…”. Similarly, it is also divided into three separate clauses that enhance the major phases when dealing in a criminal investigation and prosecutions. The first one is the grand jury, secondly right to self-incrimination, and finally double jeopardy. The way it came to be in this order was due to not only history, but by also the clarification Alfredo Garcia initiated.…

    • 1912 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Under the public safety exception, where officers engage in a custodial interrogation before Miranda warnings, and if reasonably prompted by a concern for the public safety or the safety of the arresting officers, a suspect’s statements are admissible as evidence. (New York v. Quarles (1984) 476 U.S. 656 (holding that the need for answers to questions in a situation posing a threat to the public safety outweighs the need for the prophylactic rule protecting the Fifth Amendment’s privilege against self-incrimination).) In essence, an officer must have a reasonable need to protect the public or themselves from immediate danger. Id. Moreover, the applicability of the public safety exception is not dependent upon the subjective motivation of the questioning officer.…

    • 572 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kristin Paull Professor Jennifer Ritchey Texas Government 2306 September 7, 2015 The Texas Constitution The state of Texas has gone through many constitutional revisions since the first was introduced. It differs in many ways from the federal constitution and has some provisions that are unique to it. The current constitution is continually growing and being revised as times change, to become more modern for our industrialized state.…

    • 1138 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The case of Texas vs. Johnson became of in 1984 when Gregory Lee Johnson, publicly burned an American flag as political protest to the Reagan administration. In the initial case, the state court ruled that Johnson was guilty and in fact violated a Texas law that banned flag desecration. However, the because of the constitutional nature of the case, the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed the conviction and sent the case to the Supreme Court. The fundamental constitution question was whether or not such disagreeable acts were protected under the first amendment.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The current Texas Constitution was adopted in 1876. When the people of Texas go to place their votes, they must consider nine proposed constitutional amendments. The Texas Constitution amendments are made up of joint resolutions as opposed to bills. The joint resolutions come from either the House of Representatives or the Senate. Texas Constitutional amendments may be proposed in special sessions or regular sessions of the Texas Legislature.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    They have the choice not testify against them or answer questions that they think may make them seem guilty. The 5th amendment also gives both juveniles and adults the right to a grand jury trial, which means that the authority cannot keep them captive without offering them a suitable trial. It also guards them from being…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Question 1 A. 370 U.S. 660: Robinson v. California (No. 554) Argued: April 17, 1962- Decided: June 25, 1962 The case involved Robinson and the state of California. He had violated Californian statute that prohibited addiction to narcotics (Uscourtsgov, 2018). The statute termed it a misdemeanor punishable by any person arrested with addiction to drugs, and, sustained the petitioner’s imprisonment thereunder the Californian courts. The constitutional amendments that were under scrutiny, in this case, were Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments Pp.…

    • 711 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Selective Incorporation

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages

    While the ideal example of a democracy places the decisions of government in citizen’s hands, the United States rarely does as such. For example, the Supreme Court, while influenced by public approval and public opinion, isolates itself from the media and public in two specific ways. Its Justices, appointed by the president, are indirect methods for people to get what they want from the highest branch of the Judiciary Branch. Similar to the method and processes used to elect a president through the Electoral College, the Supreme Court works in a way that places the power of the government in educated individuals’ hands as opposed to the direct power of votes in an election for a state governor. It indirectly allows people to influence Court…

    • 1029 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How would you feel if an officer could come into your home and trash it looking for something that you might not even have? If it wasn't for the fifth amendment the government could do just that. The fifth amendment protects a massive quantity of our privacy. For this reason, I agree with what is written in the 5th Amendment. It gives us the right to Grand Jury, to remain silent, and due process.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    J. Cecelia Shaulis April 13, 2015 Pols-Y 211 Dalecki Exam 3- Miranda v. Arizona One of the biggest players in law interpretation and policy-making is the judiciary system. While the other two branches of government have some control over the judiciary system through checks and balances, the federal courts have a great deal of power in the form of judicial review. Judicial review is the authority of the Supreme Court to interpret the Constitution.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction The case study involves Hernandez versus Texas this was a Mexican – American civil right case which was recorded as the first one. The case was listened by States Supreme Court this was after the Second World War. Historically it was around 1950. The case was involved murder the named Pete Hernandez who was a cotton picker was accused of killing Joe Espinosa. They were no Mexican who has served on the jury for more than twenty-five years.…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays