Use LEFT and RIGHT arrow keys to navigate between flashcards;
Use UP and DOWN arrow keys to flip the card;
H to show hint;
A reads text to speech;
29 Cards in this Set
- Front
- Back
Argument
|
Set of statements with premises which affirm the conclusion
|
|
logic
|
study of methods for evaluating whether the premises support the conclusion of an argument
|
|
Valid argument
|
it is necessary that if the premises are true, then the conclusion is true--conclusion must be true, premises arent "important"
|
|
invalid argument
|
not necessary that if the premises are true, the conclusion is true
|
|
sound argument
|
valid, and all the premises are true
|
|
unsound argument
|
either is invalid, or has a false premise
|
|
deductive logic
|
part of logic that concerns tests for validity and invalidity
|
|
induction
|
reasoning from the past, has no logical guarantee
|
|
abduction
|
reasoning the the best explanation
|
|
problification
|
a list of statements makes something very probable
|
|
statement
|
sentence that has a true/false value, no questions or commands
|
|
indexicals
|
here, there, now, him
|
|
discount
|
not sure, although, in spite of
|
|
repition
|
could help doubting, but logically unnecessary
|
|
assurance
|
obscures the logic, "it's obvious that"
|
|
Meta-argument
|
doesnt use premises, rather uses clever language to get reader to accept conclusion
|
|
argument from authority
|
relies on an expert and uses their status to try and prove your point
|
|
argument from analogy
|
comparing 2 things and justifying something through their similarities
|
|
cogent
|
strong argument with all premises being true
|
|
strong argument
|
it is probable that if the premises are true, the conclusion also is true
|
|
uncogent
|
argument that is either weak or strong with a false premise
|
|
inductive logic tests what?
|
strength and weakness
|
|
Modus Ponens
|
If A, then B.
A. So, B |
|
Modus Tollens
|
If A, then B.
Not B. So, Not A |
|
Fallacy of Denying the Antecedent
|
If A, then B.
Not A. So, Not B |
|
Fallacy of affirming the consequent
|
If A, then B.
B. So, A |
|
Hypothetical Syllogism
|
If A, then B.
If B, then C. So, If A, then C |
|
Disjunctive Syllogism
|
Either A or B.
Not A. So B. |
|
Constructive Dilemma
|
Either A or B.
If A, then C. If B, then D. So, Either C or D. |