Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Ethics

Superior Essays
Austin Parker
Intro to Ethics, Dr. Rigoni
5/4/2015

Introduction
Ethics plays a huge role in the interaction of human beings on a daily basis. It allows people to choose between right and wrong behaviors in order to create a morally upright society. For this reason, several ethical theories exist to help understand the relationship between people. A majority of well-known philosophers such as Immanuel Kant, Bentham, Stuart Mill, and Gauthier have made great contributions to sociology by theories such as deontology, utilitarianism, and social contact theories. However, the deontological work by Immanuel Kant is the most favored compared to other moral frameworks. Its focus on duties of individuals rather than consequences has my preference.
…show more content…
This is why he centered his theory of deontology on the human’s ability to reason. On the contrary, Kant’s deontology doesn’t account for one’s emotions, feelings, and consequences when deciphering the moral law or duty. The theory focuses on the understood law that human beings should perform the right actions from thinking rationally. Deontological ethics sets appropriate guidelines to raise reasoning and encourage positive behavior. Kant’s deontology relies on the human will to classify the validity of their actions (Waluchow, 2003). Good human will is connected with positive actions in social settings and moral law. However, some factors will result in weak and irrational decisions that affect the efficiency of the decision making …show more content…
It applies to tall people and satisfies the standard human rights adopted globally. The world 's human rights are based on the proposed laws of deontological ethics (Mizzoni, 2010). Several philosophers have developed ethical theories, but few of them conform to human rights (Hinman, 2013). The majority violate the rights of an individual. Like the social contract theory, it characterized society based on class, culture, and race which does not conform to equality.
Reliability
Kant’s deontology is more reliable than that of other theories. It has the necessary guidelines with the primary goal of instilling a culture of moral obligation. The structure is effective since it creates an ongoing habit of good morals. Human reasoning over emotions and social situations curbs the urge to use bad behaviors. While the focus of utilitarianism on the consequences is not reliable compared to deontology. It allows people to disobey rules based on consequences, failing to embed moral virtues into our actions.
Evidence
Deontology has been big in the past compared to other ethical theories. For example, it defends human rights by forbidding infringement of the right to fair treatment. The utilitarianism view fails to respect the rights of individuals. It 's draw to consequences of actions makes it hard to keep the welfare, and interests of

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1c) Deontologists trust that morality involves obligation. We have moral obligations to do things which it is on the whole correct to do and moral obligations not to get things done which it isn't right to do. In the case of something is correct or wrong doesn't depend on its outcomes. Or maybe, an activity is correct or wrong in itself.…

    • 646 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    When it comes to deciding which of the five workable and ethical theories, Kantianism, Social Contract Theory, Act Utilitarianism, Rule Utilitarianism, and Virtue Ethics, that others use to guide their moral decision making, people tend to follow closely to one, a combination of two, or use which ever theory that will validate their decision or benefit them the most. I personally lean towards a combination of Kantianism and Virtue Ethics. In my everyday life, it is important that I continue to build and develop my character such as patience, kindness, and honesty to be able to flourish and live a truly, happy life as I continue my life after graduation and into adulthood. I lean heavily towards Kantianism because I believe it is especially important to follow the first and second formulation of the categorical imperatives as a moral guideline. It is important to make a moral decision if an action can be followed by everybody and I believe it is important to not use people and treat others as a means to an end because I believe using people for my own benefit would weaken and diminish my character as a person.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kantian deontology refers to rights and duties so; ethics involves performing or avoiding certain kinds of actions and respecting the rights of others. Many would say that no matter what the consequences, we have certain rights and duties, for example, we should never commit homicide. For Kant, our reason for acting should always be derived from reason. In fact, for him, a person who acts purely because it is his duty is morally superior to one that does not. Kant’s view on sympathy is that all should be your rational conceived duty than sympathy.…

    • 1256 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Deontological ethics essence means that the moral values of actions are stable regardless of its consequences. The effect of moral values depends on the underground of motivation: whether it was to complete one's duty. Concerning this theory, the only one possible and fair action is to pretend that everything is done. Everyone posses the duty to take a correct action. This shows a difference of deontology from ethics theories.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The German philosopher Immanuel Kant, who plays a very important role and a central figure of modern philosophy, was a well-known proponent of the theory. His theory is an example of Deontology. He believed that there was “a supreme principle of morality” (Gaskill), which he referred to it as The Categorical Imperative, also commonly known as Kant’s Categorical Imperative. It is used to determine what our moral duties. The categorical imperative has three principles.…

    • 1753 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Utilitarianism

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Thus, you can also reason to right actions. Kant’s Moral theory emphasizes the importance of rationality, steadiness, and impartiality. Thus, moral principles cannot be violated, and then he prevents any loopholes, self-serving exemptions, and personal preferences in the determination of our obligations. However, Kant’s moral may be intriguing but it possesses difficulty-forming maxims.…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant was a deontologist and developed an unbreakable moral code that he called the “Categorical Imperative”. Kant characterized the Categorical Imperative as an objective, rationally necessary, and unconditional principle that people must…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the principle of deontology, it is an “approach to ethics focused on duties and rules” (Rich, 2016). From this perspective, violations of duties and rules, or categorical imperatives, are unacceptable regardless of the anticipated outcomes (e.g. shooting an abducted passenger plane is always an immoral thing to do and it violates the moral norm to not kill others) (Gawronski, 2016 ). Kant proposed that people should follow a universal, unconditional framework of rules as a guide to know the rightness of actions and one’s moral duties (Rich,…

    • 838 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moral philosophy tries to explain the difference between right and wrong so that people can make good decisions. However, finding out what makes an action right is not so easy. For this reason, several different theories have evolved while trying to explain this issue. One of those theories is deontology, or duty-defined morality. Probably the most famous and influential spokesman of this theory is Immanuel Kant.…

    • 1255 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What is it that makes a good deed inherently good? Some may say that the goodness of an action is characterized solely by ones motivation to do good, while other’s believe that the end result is all that matters. As human beings we are free to choose our path in life, as well as our beliefs and our actions. This allows us to decide whether we want to act in a way that will cause harm or good. Since we have the free will to decide our course of action to get the results we want, it also comes with the responsibility to choose whether we wish to act ethically.…

    • 1510 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This paper will discuss an ethical evaluation using Kantian’s theory in a lying case stated below. What is Kantian’s theory? Kantian’s theory is an ethical theory that relies on the moral goodness of all people. “Kant argued that there is an unconditional good related to rationality, the moral law, and moral duty. The theory is centered on the duty to act based upon respect for the moral law or legitimate moral rules (104).”…

    • 1124 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s theory is based on the moral law and duty as an action that should be treated respectfully. By ‘moral dilemma’ we understand the heart-wrenching decision that carries strong intuitive and emotional weight and can lead to a failure of duty (Garlikov 2). This action is influenced by the individual’s desire to act within the principles of the duty. Immanuel Kant explains that an individual can only do the right thing for the right reason, even though acting on duty is not always sufficient, as it can lead a person to do the right thing for the wrong reason. Acting from duty is the only justification what makes this law absolute and universal.…

    • 698 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the case of morals, philosophers are usually separated into one of two categories, those who consider actions ethical or not ethical based on their motives, and those who consider an action ethical or not ethical based on the consequences of these actions. Immanuel Kant is a deontologist as opposed to consequentialists, making him an advocate for the former category. Kant is of the opinion that we are held responsible for our actions because we possess the ability to consider and explain the things we do, so any moral judgment should be based on our reasons for doing things. We should of course always contemplate the consequences of our actions, but they are not entirely at the mercy of our reason. Reason is only accountable for the…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays