Juveniles committing serious offenses has sparked a contentious discussion regarding whether or not they should be tried as adults and sentenced accordingly, raising concerns about the morality and efficacy of this approach to justice. Some contend that treating minors as adults upholds justice and protects society from potential dangers. However, some stress the disparities in development between minors and adults, supporting rehabilitation and second chances in place of severe penalties. This essay presents a case—taking into account psychological aspects, historical case studies, ethical issues, and the need for justice and public safety—that minors who commit major crimes should be tried and sentenced as adults.
Adolescents who commit …show more content…
The public's view of holding minors responsible for their acts has changed over time, especially when it comes to cases of horrific crimes against humanity. Public opinion is frequently swayed by high-profile instances and media coverage, which results in proposals for more severe penalties for young criminals.
It calls into question moral responsibility and accountability to try minors as adults. Juveniles do not completely lack ethical judgment, even though they may not have the same level of cognitive development as adults. Serious crimes demonstrate a high degree of moral development and a clear sense of right from wrong.
Nonetheless, some argue that juveniles shouldn't face the same harsh penalties as adults, regardless of how serious their offenses are. Given their developmental differences from adults, they feel that sentencing juveniles to adult terms may result in excessive repercussions.
Fairness and proportionality are additional ethical elements that are included in penalties. Critics claim that because of the developmental differences between juveniles and adults, treating minors as adults may result in unduly severe
Adolescents who commit …show more content…
The public's view of holding minors responsible for their acts has changed over time, especially when it comes to cases of horrific crimes against humanity. Public opinion is frequently swayed by high-profile instances and media coverage, which results in proposals for more severe penalties for young criminals.
It calls into question moral responsibility and accountability to try minors as adults. Juveniles do not completely lack ethical judgment, even though they may not have the same level of cognitive development as adults. Serious crimes demonstrate a high degree of moral development and a clear sense of right from wrong.
Nonetheless, some argue that juveniles shouldn't face the same harsh penalties as adults, regardless of how serious their offenses are. Given their developmental differences from adults, they feel that sentencing juveniles to adult terms may result in excessive repercussions.
Fairness and proportionality are additional ethical elements that are included in penalties. Critics claim that because of the developmental differences between juveniles and adults, treating minors as adults may result in unduly severe