What Is The Principal Flaw In The Criminal Evidence Act 1965

Improved Essays
records would have been admissible and where the person who supplied the information contained in the record was dead, beyond the seas, unfit, could not with reasonable diligence be traced, or could not reasonably be expected to have any recollection of the matters dealt with in the information he supplied. This statutory exception to the hearsay rule could be seen as an extension of the long established common law rule which admits the declarations of deceased persons acting under a duty to do an act and record it in the ordinary course of business. However, the principal flaw in the Criminal Evidence Act 1965 was that it was restricted to business

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    People make decisions on the basis of circumstantial evidence in the everyday affairs of life. Nonetheless, the sources that stated the court…

    • 1290 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The critical implications of the decision of Haque & Ors v Minister for Immigration & Anor [2015] FCCA 1765 (2 July 2015) in terms of the binding nature of opinions of Medical Officers of the Commonwealth (“MOC”) appointed by the Minister, are as it is stated in regulation 2.25A of the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) the (“Regulations”). In that the opinion of the MOC is to be taken as to be correct in determining whether a person meets the requirements of Public Interest Criteria (“PIC”) 4005. The delegate of the Minister is not to form their own opinion on whether or not an applicant meets the requirements of PIC 4005.…

    • 767 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Firstly, the defence counsel and jury were not provided crucial information that may have altered the outcome of the trial. Had they had access to the two unofficial autopsy documents, the defence could have argued about whether Truscott committed the crime, due to the assumed time of death of the victim. Additionally, the Crown failed to recognize Dr. Penistan’s description of his findings as an “agonizing reappraisal”. If the Crown had revealed this information, Truscott could possibly have been released earlier.…

    • 1768 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Quennie Volupides is guilty of murdering her husband Arthur. First off, she had both a motive and opportunity to commit the crime. Second, all the hard evidence points to her guilt. Finally, we believe the murder weapon was found at the scene and is tied to Queenie. I arrived at the scene around 2 o’clock in the morning after what I thought was my last shift for the night.…

    • 284 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    One of the key laws that impact Dr Haneef’s pt IC of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth). This Act authorises an arresting officer to arrest a person for an offence if the officer has reasonable grounds to believe that the person has committed a crime. In the case of Dr Haneef, the federal police officers alleged that Haneef was suspected to be involved in the attempted terrorist attack on Glasgow airport. His involvement was contradicted when he gave his mobile phone SIM card to his second cousin in England, who was also a suspect in this attack. Haneef’s association in this attack resulted in him being arrested at Brisbane airport with a one-way ticket back to India.…

    • 237 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The “Omnibus Crime and Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968” is made to “prevent crime and to insure the greatest safety of the people. ”(Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Street Act of 1968). What the act did was give financial assistance to state/local government law enforcement, provision through confessions in criminal trials. (Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Act of 1968). It also acquired regulations to allow wiretapping by law enforcement authorities.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The definition or exclusionary rule “is a law that protects the use of illegally obtained evidence in a criminal trial.” The exclusionary rule falls under the fourth amendment which protects every individual from unlawful searches and seizure. This rule is based on the constitutional law, it was made, so that evidence that was collected “illegally” cannot be used to prosecute a suspect. To begin with, if a police officers want to obtain a warrant, they must have reasonable causes to do a search legally.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    R V Campbell (2010) NSWSC 995 Desmond Campbell was found guilty of pushing his wife, Janet Campbell, of six months off a cliff top in the Royal National Park. Desmond pushed Janet from the top of a sheer 50m cliff south of Burning Palms, resulting in her death as she had hit her head on a rick platform below, in March 2005. Elements Of The Offence Before a criminal act can be brought to trial, the police and prosecutors need to prove the elements of a particular offence are present. The elements are; actus reus, mens rea and causation.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    American criminal justice system enforces our laws and keeps watch over us but who is watching over the system? Oversight over the system may after all, be less than optimal going by various criminal cases tainted by prosecutorial misconduct resulting in wrongful convictions. From law enforcement, the elected officials, the court system, to corrections, prosecutorial misconduct gained notoriety because of the absolute immunity they enjoy. According to Silverglate, (2000), “We now live in a time of sharply decreasing faith in the criminal justice system.” This decreasing faith might not be unconnected to the egregiously bad behavior that dots the criminal justice landscape.…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Eyewitness identification relies upon the eyewitness memory and the ability for him or her to retain that information and reporting it straight to the police. Memory is considered as evidence because information is being gathered and encoded in memory. Over time the storage holds in the encoded information in the brain until retrieval occurs so the brain can have access to the information. Although memory is not accurate, errors can occur throughout the process of encoding, storage, or retrieval. Even images and sound can deteriorate over time, which makes it hard to recall them back.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Western New England University The United States Criminal Justice System Faults Readers from varied backgrounds will approach this book with different knowledge and experiences. Did Stevenson’s example resonate with you, or were you shocked? Is the book an eye-opener for you, or validation of what you already knew? Explain your answers, using evidence from the text.…

    • 1295 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    he said he said situation. And he only mentions the crime to another person far after it is committed. The material evidence is no more convincing. The minuscule material evidence in the case of the crown vs Tshuanahusset is found under dubious circumstances, and is not particularly convincing. An axe stolen from William Robinsons home is a key piece of evidence.…

    • 1188 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rape Shield Law

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The federal government subsequently drafted new legislation that protected victims from cross-examination unless the judge decided that the information was relevant. The revised laws also define consent more clearly, and a number of situations are listed in which consent is assumed not to exist – for example, when the victim is unable to consent because of intoxication (Newman & White, 2012, p.…

    • 836 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Australia Aboriginal people are far more likely to be arrested than non-Aboriginal people, and account for a quarter of all deaths in custody. It has been said that “the Justice system of Australia still has a long way to go in responding effectively to the needs of Indigenous people trapped in the cycle of the criminal justice system and, more particularly, in preventing deaths in custody (Corrin and Douglas, 2008, p.531). Reasons for this can be attributed to the mistrust of the police, laws around drinking that are seen as unfair by the community, perceived double standards of those working in the police force, the failure of the justice system to implement alternatives to detaining and holding arrested people in custody, failure of police to assess health of people being detained, investigations that seem to be biased and not carried out ethically, and the failure of the justice…

    • 1483 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Are here any limits on the principle of Parliamentary Sovereignty? In answering this question, I will first set out a traditional definition of Parliamentary sovereignty. I will then consider two different senses in which it might be said that there are limits on Parliament’s sovereignty.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays