What Are The Arguments Against Rule Utilitarianism

Decent Essays
I found it interesting that you believe that rule utilitarianism is preferred. The book states, “… rule utilitarianism tells us what kinds of actions are morally right, regardless of the specific situation” (130). I believe that act utilitarianism is more preferable although I see your point about rule utilitarianism. For instance, I believe that killing is wrong; some may say abortion is okay if the woman was raped. I agree that a form of rule utilitarianism is acceptable because it is still morally wrong to me, and should not be done even if the woman was raped. Creation.com makes a good point against act utilitarianism also, “But suppose you’re not a very pleasant person and a lot of people would like to see you dead. Then their happiness

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rule-Utilitarianism is a rule that endorses that each action provides the most happiness for any given party. Rule-Utilitarianism determines the rightness or wrongness of an action by determining if the action to be performed will offer the most happiness with everything considered. Norcross’ target argument is arguing that torturing puppies by oneself is just as immoral as hiring someone else to do it for Fred. The argument concludes by saying that torturing puppies is indeed immoral by oneself but also immoral if one hires someone else to do it. Therefore, we see that Rule Utilitarianism is used to decipher which action is going to produce the most…

    • 897 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The purpose of this essay will be to examine a complex moral case through the lens of the theories of Classical Act Utilitarianism and Rule Consequentialism. The theories will be compared and evaluated based on how they apply to the moral case. The situation that will ultimately be the basis to compare Classical Act Utilitarianism (AU) and Rule Consequentialism (RC), is the story of Jim. During a trip to South Africa, Jim finds himself to be a little lost and disoriented and in the wrong small town. Jim notices that in the middle of the town’s center square there are 20 Indian tied up against a wall, all in a row and supervised by uniformed men.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are two types of utilitarianism; act and rule. Act utilitarianism refers to the above definition; it is an action that will have an outcome that benefits the most people or promotes more intrinsic goodness than any other action without regard to laws or rules, it is a person's own choice. For example, if a person donates money to their favorite charity, not only do they feel good about it, but they are contributing to the bottom line that supports and makes many individuals happy.…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ethics are the moral codes that administer conduct of a man or gathering of individuals with respect to what is good and bad. These ethical codes rotate around built up qualities and standards and may not be the same from society to culture. Ethics indicate the way a specific game-plan characterizing satisfactory practices and decisions. Managerial ethics are an arrangement of standards that direct the behavior of a director working inside of a working environment. (Burke, n.d) Two theoretical concepts from managerial ethics to look at coca cola dilemma are Utilitarianism theory and Deontological theory.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    530). The practice of this theory does not base ethical right or wrong based on intent of the actions like the deontological theory does. Instead, it focuses on the outcome of a decisions and whether or not the decision maximized pleasure and utility. Edge & Groves (2006) concluded that “the act of utilitarianism can be captured in the principle that one ought to act as to produce the greatest balance of happiness over unhappiness, everyone considered” (p. 34 & 35). If the law were to take into consideration the utilitarian perspective, it would be more lenient and understanding of the overall situation.…

    • 1148 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Some of the similarities that these three theories have are that they seek the common good for all. However, at the same time, there are different units of analysis for the Utilitarianism theories. For instance, the unit of analysis of Act-Utilitarianism is measuring particular cases, while the unit of an analysis of Rule-Utilitarianism applies equally for everyone. In conclusion, this philosophy paper has the aim to explore the decision making of both Act and Rule Utilitarian theories based on the evaluation of a scenario and the decision made according to their understanding of what is correct.…

    • 1190 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social justice The analysis of social justice can be a complex, this is due to the many features contributing to how social justice is perceived. Each individual has their own view on defining social justice, which can be influenced many possible factors (Garvin & Reisch, 2016). Furthermore, the analysis of social justice consists firstly on what is social justice, the background and people who have influenced this concept, and the different arguments surrounding social justice. In addition, despite the conflicting views on defining social justice, it can be agreed by both political and philosophical fields that social justice needs social burdens, as well as benefits to be shared equally in society, whether it’s tangible or intangible (Garvin…

    • 1183 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the ethical branch of philosophy there are several theories on how one should leave their life but, most do not provide a sufficient answer, but there is one theory that has provided an answer; and that is Utilitarianism a subset of consequentialism. This theory is defined by its core idea of maximizing overall happiness of everyone, and has been used to shape some of the fundamental ideas governments use to govern their various countries; this is due to Utilitarianism providing a logical way of thinking upon moral issues, but like most things, Utilitarianism does have some drawbacks to it, such drawbacks would include; justifications for certain actions like murder, or torture. Even with these draw backs, I personally believe in Utilitarianism,…

    • 1136 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Both act-utilitarianism and rule- utilitarianism agree with the idea that morality right or wrong actions depends on the effect of it. Act-utilitarianism can be described as an act that is only right if it maximizes the total usefulness and results in the greatest amount of good in a great amount of people. It considers the outcome of a single act. The action of act-utilitarianism as to yield a great amount of utility than any other action. On the other hand, rule utilitarianism can be described as following a specific rule that is applied to a situation rather than look at the outcome.…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Act Of Utilitarianism

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The rule of utilitarianism is more efficient because it increases the amount of happiness and pleasure while making good decisions. Also, it relates to a good result in applying for jobs, have good intentions toward others, and have a sense of logical mind to create good decisions. As a rule of utilitarianism, the chief of British Domestic Security Agency, will refrain from torturing the suspect because based on the rule of utilitarianism, the person has to decide on the best option that will bring the most happiness while abiding the rules. The chief has to obey the rules in a sincere way so that everybody can gain his love and appreciation . In making a right decision, he has to (1) find a way for the terrorists to leave the area and (2) to make sure everyone is safe and sound and remove them from the building.…

    • 1436 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us begin by formally defining act utilitarianism: a theory of right action that defines the act to be “right if and only if, and because, its consequences contain at least as large a net balance of wellbeing minus ill-being as those of any alternative possible act in that situation” (Frick, Lecture 1 Slides). And thus, an act utilitarian, when making decisions regarding human life, looks solely at the net difference in wellbeing and ill-being. I would like to call attention to the impersonality — which I believe to be the strongest objection to act utilitarianism— that results from this process of quantifying happiness, as it disregards perspectives of the individual as well as the intrinsic value of human life. Take, for example, the moral dilemma caused by the fat man in the trolley problem as presented by Thomson in “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The situation with the fat man is essentially as follows:…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I thought this chapter was interesting and it made me think a lot more about utilitarianism. I think utilitarianism is right in some circumstances, like making a speed limit of sixty-five miles per hour instead of allowing people to drive as slow or fast as they want. If drivers drive too slow it can cause more accidents and more traffic jams. If drivers drive too fast they can lose control, cause more accidents, and scare other people. But, in other circumstances like limiting reproduction to one child it is not the job to tell someone how many kids they can have.…

    • 843 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act utilitarianism has slightly different connotations depending on the philosopher being discussed. However, the general contemporary act utilitarian defines an action as morally necessary only if there is no other action that would produce an equal or greater amount of happiness. In line with this contemporary definition, Bentham recognized the fundamental role of pleasure and pain in the human life and used his knowledge to create an act utilitarian measure of actions. Bentham approves or disapproves an action based on the amount of pain or pleasure the action causes. Likewise, he equates good actions with pleasure and evil actions with pain.…

    • 1236 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism comes from the word utility, which means the state of being beneficial to those affected. The Theory of Utilitarianism is the idea that a person must make decisions that create the greatest amount of utility for the greatest amount of people. Utilitarianism is a Consequentialist theory because it claims that actions are morally right if they produce the desired consequences, which according to Mill, are pleasures. There are two types of Utilitarianism: Act Utilitarianism and Rule Utilitarianism. Act Utilitarianism examines behavior based on the actions taken while making a decision, while Rule Utilitarianism examines behavior based on the rules and principles that have been made to create the greatest amount of utility for…

    • 1736 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Specifically, rule utilitarianism brings about the idea that one should act according to a set of rules that would lead to the most optimal consequences and is deemed by a majority to be acceptable. In contrary, Kant believed that one’s actions should be based on the purity of the will and not based on consequences at…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays