Walter Reckless Containment Theory

Superior Essays
Crime Causation:
A Comparison of Two Theories
Andrew Dyar
Anderson University

Abstract: This essay offers a comparison between Robert Akers’ Social Learning Theory, and Walter Reckless’ Containment Theory. Social Learning Theory expands on Edwin Sutherland’s Differential Association Theory and seeks to explain that crime causation in some individuals is contributed to external factors in their environment. Containment Theory exists as part of the control theory that credits crime causation to external factors facing an individual, but also internal factors that affect a person’s decision to commit crime. In conclusion this paper compares and contrasts these two theories with a brief discussion.
…show more content…
Reckless explores how some individuals come to be involved in criminal activity and others do not. Reckless believes that there are a number of factors that contribute to one deciding to commit crime including those that are psychological, genetic, and environmental. The Containment Theory was designed to explain how this push and pull affect some, while the majority tends to conform to the norms of society. Reckless explained that both an outer containment and inner containment exist and act as a shelter from criminal activity that prevent the person from being exposed to these pushes and pulls, and in order for criminal activity to occur these containments must be weakened (Lilly et al., …show more content…
Social Learning Theory and Containment Theory both acknowledge that society plays a strong role in crime; however, Containment Theory, being part of the control theory school of thought, also places strong emphasis on the individual and internal factors to explain how some people commit criminal activity while others do not when exposed to the same external forces (Lilly et al., 2015). The real difference in these theories becomes a question of free will. Are people defined simply by their environments and learned behaviors, or is there something internal that steers us in our development? Personally, my opinion most closely coincides with Reckless and his peers among the control theory, but one cannot deny that Akers’ Social Learning Theory has been considered one of the best explanations for crime causation. Using Akers’ theory, if one is able to gather statistical data of an area and take measures to make changes and improve that environment it could reduce the criminal presence in that area by disrupting the criminal element that exists. Although this might merely force those who commit crime to relocate to somewhere fitting to their beliefs rather than eliminate the problem. If the goal of law enforcement and political leaders is to heed to Social Learning Theory, and hope to find a solution

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    4. Expanding the Labeling Theory beyond primary and secondary deviance, Braithwaite’s sub-theory of Reintegrative Shaming sought to provide a better understanding and new approach to understanding the role of labeling criminal activity throughout society. According to Reid (2012), Braithwaite’s restorative justice theorized that “labeling might cause some people to abandon criminal activity; it might cause others to continue crime” (p. 173). The major difference between reintegrative shaming theory and traditional labeling theory is the rejection of the idea “that stigmatization is an inevitable product of social disapproval, and its corollary that the application of social control is a fraught exercise” (Harris, 2010, p. 4). Braithwaite…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Due Process Model

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Having a police officer feel less in control could definitely lead to an arrest. The obvious evidence could also lead to an arrest, as the evidence could point directly to the person. Other factors, like the type of crime, the stress the officer is under, and if the person is a minority, could lead to arrests as well. Do you think community policing programs are useful at deterring and reducing crime? Why or why…

    • 822 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Hirschi’s social control theory, he believes that individual differences that develop early in a person’s life have effects across the entire course of their life. Hirschi joined with Criminologist Michael Gottfredson in this belief, and both believe that criminal behavior is gratifying to some and that crime can lead to short-term pleasure. Hirschi and Gottfredson both believe that self-control, not social bonds are largely responsible for why some commit criminal acts (Cullen, Agnew, Wilcox, 2014). Hirschi and Gottfredson’s Self-Control Theory believe and made the case that the main cause of crime is a lack of self-control. Both Hirschi and Gottfredson not only believe that crime is an easily achieved source of short-term pleasure but…

    • 1738 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within the vast multitude of social structural theories, two stand out among all the others. Shaw and Mckay’s Social Disorganization Theory serves as a unique theory that attempts to gauge the cause of the seemingly rampant crime occurring in society. Particularly, the Social Disorganization theory references an individual’s environment as a significant factor contributing to their moral fiber and ultimately their behavior. Henceforth, those individuals who are unfortunate to have to grow in an environment that is teeming with crime and composed of those with low socioeconomic status, they are likely to follow the common trend. This trend is in coinciding correlation with delinquent behavior and criminal activities.…

    • 1553 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This theory focus on the influence of the organization of society and social conditions. Sociological theory encompasses a wide range of theoretical perspective; but mostly regarding to crime as social phenomenon. It also emphasizes the cultural and social elements of crime behavior. “Sociological theory look at crime as social problem, and not as an individual problem.” (Boyd, 2003). Social learning theory is when people learn from each other how to commit crimes.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nobody fully knows why people commit crimes and negatively affect our society, but society can try to explain some reasons with sociological theories. People can look at three widely known Sociological theories of crime; Strain, social learning, and control theories. Each of these theories explain crime by using social environment such as, family, school, social groups (friends), workplace, community, and society. Each theory is similar but at the same time very different, each theory is different on how social environments cause crime, they take different parts of social environment, and some theories explain differences of the individual and others explain differences in social groups. Strain theory explains that individuals engage in crime because they are stressed or strained.…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The differences between the theories are that Social learning discusses that people learn how to commit a crime. It suggests that people learn the criminal behavior the same way as they learn conventional behavior. Social control theory is about the failure of society to control criminal behaviors. Social labeling theory maintains the negative labels that make them think who they are when they are really not who people tend to label them as. The similarities of the three are that they all have to do with crime and how it is…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With labeling theory it is shown that placing a label such as a criminal on an individual, it will not deter an individual from crime, but make it more likely that the individual will continue or start this behavior and more toward crime. It is discussed that applying a label of a deviant on another makes them more likely to gravitate toward this label and exhibit behavior that goes along with the label. This is a contrast to how the deterrence theory would view criminal punishment. Deterrence theory would see this as a possibility to deter crime as it could use an individual for general deterrence. By labeling the individual as an offender (possible even labeling them as a specific type of offender), the deterrence theory can make an example out of the individual with the type of sanction that is given.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Theories like the General Strain Theory from theorist Agnew claim that the reason why some people commit crime is in response to the strain put on them by various sources. General Strain Theory claims that when exposed to strain and stressors it is only human nature to respond negatively and some people may try to cope through crime. Agnew’s theory as mention in Criminological Theory by Cullen, Agnew, & Wilcox (2014) claims that strains are most likely to cause crime when they are seen in high magnitude, are seen as unjust, are associated with low social control, and create some pressure or incentive to engage in criminal coping. Strains with these characteristics are more likely to elicit strong negative emotions, reduce the ability to engage in legal coping, reduce the perceived costs of crime, and create a disposition for crime. (p. 205).…

    • 762 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This quote describes the ways in which people can experience the same situation, such as the “teen arrest” quote stated previously, but the consequences (reward or punishment) will have a different impact on the person. The impact of the consequences (reward or punishment) will mold the individual into performing “conforming” or “deviant” behaviors. The theories are similar in the ways they attempt to explain deviant and/or criminal behaviors in a way that contradicts psychology or biology as the only explanations of criminal behaviors. Sutherland’s ability to eliminate psychology from his theory of Differential Association created a way of explaining and theorizing criminal behaviors as a more understandable concept. Some aspects of psychology can make concepts less understandable, as they become more conceptual and less…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays