Utilitarianism: A Consequentialist Moral Theory

Improved Essays
Utilitarianism is a consequentialist moral theory, where actions are judged right or wrong solely by virtue of their consequences which was introduced by Jeremy Bentham and later carried out by John Stuart Mill (Kemerling,2011). In regards to the consequences the only importance is the amount of happiness or unhappiness that was produced. In regards to utilitarianism it is believed that everyone counts as one, and no one counts as less or more than another person. And that a person should do what will promote the greatest number of happiness. According to utilitarian’s happiness can be defined in two ways, one by the pleasure and the absence of pain, and secondly by knowing it’s the only desirable end, or the final good. Every other desirable thing is so either for the …show more content…
A Kantian however would consider two questions before continuing with a decision, one asking can I rationally will that everyone act as I propose to act? Secondly, does my action respect the goals of human beings rather than merely using them for my own purposes? not sacrifice the two passengers since he believed that murder was absolutely prohibited even in cases where it would bring about more happiness than the alternative (Anscombe). As far as the scenario where the young person’s organs are being redistributed amongst five people, a Utilitarian would have no problem with this situation and would use the cost/benefit analysis to support their answer since it is a one-to-five cost-to-benefit ratio, and the person was involuntarily killed anyway. If the utilitarian factored in the parent’s happiness and wishes versus the five families, they would choose the five families since their happiness would outweigh the

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarian Ethical Theory

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Among the three ethical theories studied in class, the utilitarian theory can be used in explaining ethical implications of Face Recognition technology. Chonko, Larry (1-5) describes various ethical theories. However, Chonko Larry (2) asserts that utilitarian ethical theory is based on the ability of an individual to predict the significance of an action. Action in this case study is using Facial Recognition technology in iPhone X. According to the theory, an option which results in the greatest benefit to most individuals is the one who is ethically right and correct.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to Mill “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” (John Stuart Mill). In its simplest form utilitarianism can be defined as actions morally permissible if and only if they produce at least as much net happiness as any other available action. Its core idea is that whether actions are morally right or wrong depends on their effects. When making a decision for one’s self he/she must consider what will bring themselves the most happiness. When making a decision that will affects other…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism: Case One: According to Utilitarianism, the net good for all must be achieved. This includes both the quantity and the quality of the good. Moreover, there is a distinct difference between Egoism and Utilitarianism. In the first scenario, the consequences of the young man’s actions will only result in happiness for him.…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Utilitarianism is defined as an act for the interest of all. This theory states that everyone should perform the act that will bring about the greatest good for everyone, no matter if the benefits are produced by lies, manipulation, or coercion. “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness” –John Stuart Mill An example of Utilitarianism that I have experienced is usually at work. I work at a school for autistic, mentally ill and behavioral children and young adults.…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Morality and the proper way in which one is able to come to an ethical conclusion has been an issue up for debate for philosophers and their theories throughout history. The issue of morality and the proper way in which one is expected to behave in various circumstances is argued throughout many theories, including utilitarianism and deontology. In my first paragraph, I will be explaining the trolley problem, while in the second and third, I will discuss the way in which utilitarianism and deontology would approach the problem. In my fourth paragraph, I will continue to discuss my personal views on the trolley problem and the theory I predominantly agree with. Utilitarianism states one should do the greatest good for greatest number of people,…

    • 1274 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is considered ‘right’ and ‘just’ is determined by maximizing happiness and minimizing pain. For this situation in particular, utilitarianism proves to be the right answer. However, utilitarianism isn’t always the morally-correct way to decide something. Utilitarianism prompts scapegoating by giving the majority the privilege of determining the future, no matter the cost of for the “lesser amount.”…

    • 726 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is based off of the idea that we serve two sovereign masters: pleasure and pain. This means that everything we do in life we do in order to increase pleasure and decrease pain. Utilitarianism is broken up further into two categories: consequentialism and hedonism. Consequentialism is the idea that actions are right and wrong based only on their consequences. In this view, the motive does not matter.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In this essay I will be talking about the Utilitarian and Libertarian on the taxation issue I will do that by giving both definitions of Utilitarian and Libertarian, and give their views on taxation then argue against the one I believe that it not just then argue in support of the one I believe it’s just. Utilitarianism is a belief that the right course of action is the one that will produce the greatest happiness of the greatest number of people, it could be said that it’s to maximise the happiness of many people. Libertarianism suggest that people should be free, think the way they like and to do whatever thing they wish to do as long as it doesn’t violate other right to do the same. On the taxation issue utilitarian says that taxation…

    • 744 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The moral philosopher Bentham wanted decisions to be made that would result in the most pleasure. It is also based on the final outcome, so for something to be considered right or wrong, it is determined by the consequences. This theory does not…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that is concerned with the maximisation of happiness. This theory is used to decide which course of action can best minimise pain while ensuring the majority benefit; through happiness. Jeremy Bentham introduced utilitarianism as “the greatest happiness of the greatest number [,] that is the measure of right and wrong.” This theory demonstrates a straightforward process to defining what is morally acceptable and which actions should be taken. However, by doing this, utilitarianism does not consider individual scenarios or the emotions that people experience, the theory limits itself to a broad scope of situations.…

    • 1083 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The definition of utilitarianism is the following; “Utilitarianism is a theory in normative ethics holding that the moral action is the one that maximizes utility. Utility is defined in various ways, including as pleasure, economic well-being and the lack of suffering.” To summarize that, it means doing the greatest good for the most people. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialist thinking. Thus meaning, that it focuses on the end result.…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory that holds that we must act in a way that generates as much happiness in the world as possible. This theory holds three most important principles: First, what is good for people is that the amount of happiness (or the satisfaction of desires) is as high as possible. Second, in general, what is better is that the total of happiness is as high as possible. Third, we must act in a way that increases the total of happiness. Based on those principles, there is a point of view is called negative utilitarianism, a particular form of utilitarianism that does not focus on the total sum of well-being and suffering, but in minimizing the total amount of suffering.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an “act as to maximize or further pleasure for everyone.” Jeremy Bentham, a philosopher and creator of the Hedonic Calculus argues that there are only two masters when it comes to maximizing happiness, pleasure v.s. pain. However, according to his calculus whoever is receiving more pleasure than pain, by all means should continue the act, even if it is immoral. For example, if a sadist is torturing an innocent person and is receiving more pleasure than the innocent person is receiving pain then, according to Bentham it is okay for the sadist to continue because that would mean maximum happiness has been achieved. And the sole goal of Utilitarianism is to maximize pleasure for everyone.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays