Thrasymachus Vs Plato

Improved Essays
In Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus begins with the assertion of a hypothetical generalization: that laws are enacted for one’s own benefit. Although these laws may differ substantially contingent on the moral philosophy, distinct perceptions, or the beliefs entrenched in distinct systems of government, justice is patently defined. Political authority is not granted without the approval of a moral application of influence. Unequivocally, unless the weaker secure a tactical bargaining platform, justice will regularly be “advantageous for the stronger (15).” Under those circumstances, the disadvantaged are often compelled to challenge the higher authority when corruption or the immoral use of power becomes evident. Thrasymachus’ conclusions are

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s Position on Justice in Comparison to Dante and Machiavelli Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored. Socrates concludes that education and obedience are parallels.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Unlike Herodotus, Thucydides made limited reference to the Greek…

    • 258 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    It is now clear that Thrasymachus has engaged in intellectual dishonesty as well as hubristic argumentation. Thrasymachus is demonstrably a sophist because he is motivated purely by self-interest. Plato portrays the clear self-interest of Thrasymachus a few paragraphs above his, Thrasymachus’, first definition of Justice. After claiming to Glaucon and his fellow interlocutors that he is “one who does know,” Thrasymachus says, “You amuse me, but in addition to learning, you must pay a fine.” (337D)…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, Thrasymachus and Socrates fall on opposite sides of the debate over whether leading a life of justice or injustice results in happiness. Thrasymachus argues justice in and of itself has no intrinsic value, but it is the appearance of justice that benefits the individual. Socrates, on the other hand, insists appearance alone is not enough but being truly just leads to an inner life of peace and balance. The unjust person experiences a turbulent internal existence, which leads to a life of misery and despair. I will argue that Socrates, despite making a strong case for the just city, fails in his argument for the happy life of just person.…

    • 2032 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In The Republic, as recorded by Plato, a teacher named Thrasymachus argues with a philosopher named Socrates that justice is the advantage of the stronger. Later, he declares that a person who is good at their job, for example a good teacher, will exhibit both knowledge and care for the person they assist. These statements are contradicting. A good, strong teacher would show care for his students, and refrain from taking advantage of them. Thrasymachus’s definition of justice cannot be true if his statement of a good teacher is true.…

    • 126 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Republic, Thrasymachus defines justice as the advantage of the stronger. Socrates refutes this argument by proving that the stronger do not always make decisions to their advantage, that the stronger should not be making decisions that advantage them and that justice is more beneficial to the individual than injustice. In analyzing Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, there are aspects that need to be considered. Firstly, Thrasymachus talks about a group of people – the stronger.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice and morality can be defined, in the simplest of terms, by the act of treating people the way they deserve to be treated. To some, the idea of this is straight forward with only one answer. But to others, there are an endless amount of views as to which justice and morality can be defined. By comparing Thrasymachus ' views on justice and morality from Plato 's Republic, with Nietzsche 's views from The Genealogy of Morals, on the same topic, one can clearly see many similarities and differences. Both, Nietzsche and Thrasymachus believe that justice and morality have been divided by the classes, and that in most situations it is the one in the upper class who is being given an advantage.…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Plato's Republic transcribed by Plato, Socrates argues with Thrasymachus on the matter, is being just good and wise? Socrates asks Thrasymachus a question that eventually makes Thrasymachus rethink his position. Socrates makes the argument that justice is wise and good and injustice is ignorance and bad; however, Thrasymachus thinks alternatively in a sense that he defends injustice as being better of the two. Through Socrates’ method of elenchus, Socrates comes to the conclusion “the just has turned out to be wise and good and the unjust evil and ignorant” (The Republic 350c). Socrates arises to this conclusion because the just wouldn't want to exceed his like but the unjust would want to exceed his like and unlike simultaneously.…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dionysus Vs Plato

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Right now Plato's close to home intercession in Sicilian legislative issues stops. The squabble in the middle of Dion and Dionysius regularly went on, and Dion, whose one extraordinary flaw, as Plato lets him know, was need of "flexibility" and savoir-faire, decided to recuperate his rights with the solid hand. Enrollment went ahead in the Peloponnese and somewhere else, with the dynamic simultaneousness of huge numbers of the more youthful parts of the Academy, and in the mid year of 357 Dion made a sudden and fruitful dash over the water, caught Syracuse, and broadcasted its "opportunity." Plato thought of him a letter of salutation on the achievement, however cautioned him of his inclination to convey things with excessively high a hand…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Phaedo is perhaps one of the most well-known dialogues written by the ancient Greek philosopher, Plato. This dialogue recounts Socrates’ final hours before his death as told by Phaedo of Elis, one of the philosophers present during that time. Along with him were Crito and two other Pythagorean philosophers, Simmias and Cebes. The main focus of this dialogue is on the subject of immortality and the soul, and whether or not the soul will survive death. Socrates provides four arguments in which he aims to prove that the soul is in fact immortal.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Plato, towards his philosophy gives important places to the idea of justice. “Good Governance” is like a phase that has become a part of the vernacular of a large range development. In Plato’s Republic, Plato argues about the kings should become philosophers or vice-versa philosophers should become kings, or even a philosopher king. Today’s democracy is finely defined as government of the people and by the people. Plato argues that only a certain type of education is available for only a few people.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thrasymachus defines justice as what is advantageous to the stronger. This assumes a hierarchical society is always established. Those at the top of the hierarchy are thus able to decide what is and isn’t just by shaping other’s perception and standards of justice through laws or other means, including social norms. Justice for Thrasymachus, holds an instrumental utility for the people in power. The definition he poses doesn’t define justice as a tangible concept but a key characteristic of justice and how it is played out in a society.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The opposing view of justice in the podcast and Plato’s Republic is given by Thrasymachus, who claimed justice belonged to those with power as they have the strength to break the rules, exploiting the weaker. Breaking the law is more just than…

    • 1929 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Justice: a set of values deemed "just" that are often used to establish law codes or serve as the basis for governments. And yet, despite its ability to invoke a moral high ground, the concept of justice may often go unexamined. However, in Book I of Plato's Republic, Polemarchus is forced to not only articulate a concise definition of justice, but is also forced to come to its defense in response to an inquisitive Socrates. Through the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates, Plato forces the reader to question the traditional Greek perspective on justice and attempt to develop a new definition. Central to comprehending the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates lies in understanding Polemarchus' notion of justice.…

    • 1132 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays