Polemarchus Idea Of Justice In Plato's Republic

Superior Essays
Justice: a set of values deemed "just" that are often used to establish law codes or serve as the basis for governments. And yet, despite its ability to invoke a moral high ground, the concept of justice may often go unexamined. However, in Book I of Plato's Republic, Polemarchus is forced to not only articulate a concise definition of justice, but is also forced to come to its defense in response to an inquisitive Socrates. Through the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates, Plato forces the reader to question the traditional Greek perspective on justice and attempt to develop a new definition. Central to comprehending the conversation between Polemarchus and Socrates lies in understanding Polemarchus' notion of justice. Arriving …show more content…
The first major change Polemarchus makes is in his redefinition of a friend to one wo "seems to be, and is, good" (334e). While this maintains that a friend is only within a certain group, this modification adds the requirement that the friend be a good person. Despite being unable to address the possibility of human error when considering who is a friend or not, Polemarchus' reclassification makes explicit the need of justice to be good. Beyond reclassification of a friend, Polemarchus makes a more substantial shift: he concedes that there is no justice in harming another, whether friend or foe. After agreeing with Socrates that "justice [is] human virtue" (335c) and that animals are harmed become worse with respect to virtue, he is forced to concede that "it is not the work of the just man to harm either a friend or anyone else" (335d). This point marks a significant shift in his conception of justice, as it reveals Polemarchus' rejection of harming others. While his view of justice continues to be relatively insular, he rejects the idea that it would be just to harm his enemies—a core belief of the

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Thucydides’ description of the Peloponnesian War, besides being an account of an enormous conflict, also serves as an account of the many views of justice. The Athenians, the imperial force in ancient Greece, often assert that justice plays no role in foreign affairs. This belief, specifically explained at Sparta and Melos, is the Athenian Thesis. Although not all Athenians agree with the Athenian Thesis as proposed at Sparta and Melos, it is still an important theme in the Peloponnesian War. The Melian Dialogue specifically displays how little regard the Athenian Thesis shows for justice.…

    • 1557 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the Oxford dictionary harm is defined as “Physical injury, especially that which is deliberately inflicted”. Based on this definition the general understanding of harm in modern day society is to intentionally, and physically hurt someone. Therefore, when a police officer is shot in the line of duty – paralyzing him – is an example of harm in terms of the modern definition. However, this is the exact fact that Socrates definition contradicts.…

    • 612 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice has been an evolutionary concept that has been forever evolving for thousands of years. However, in order for the modern deduction of justice to have been made by modern standards, the concept of justice itself needs to be established. Although its formal understanding may have been unclear during their time period, Hesiod and Homer both attempt to understand and exert their opinions as to what justice is through their epic poems and other works. Even though some of their views on justice conflict and others compliment each other, they both laid a foundation to explain what justice meant in Greek society.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He seems to understand that what makes moral sense to others is going to be the more desirable option that the community is going to follow and what the majority deems as “just” is the direction that community is going to agree with overall over something deemed “wrong” or ultimately unjust. Socrates also states that justice trumps injustice because he believes that it is a human virtue, which is the foundation and dispositions to perform good acts. Justice and the well-being of a community is achieved when those individuals of a society are living to fulfill their humanly virtues. As stated before, the majority will take more interest in an issue that is morally just over something that is…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, the images of justice are perceived differently between several characters in this novel. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, all present contrasting ideals of justice compared to the one envisioned by Socrates. Using the art of rhetoric, Socrates utilizes argumentation to identify the faults in each individual’s vision of justice, and how his unconventional perception of justices can change their entire society. The first vision of justice discussed in The Republic was Cephalus. Cephalus describes justice as honesty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Glaucon is unsatisfied with the argument between Thrasymachus and Socrates regarding Justice. Thrasymachus believes Justice is for the common good, it is not for the good for an individual, that any compromise is involved. Glaucon renews Thrasymachus’ argument, he divides the good into three classes: things good in themselves, things good both in themselves and for their consequences, and things good only for their consequences. Socrates places justice in the class of things good in themselves and for their consequences without any hesitation. Glaucon wants Socrates to prove by exploring that Justice is best, not a compromise.…

    • 713 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While attempting to find the correct meaning of the word justice, Socrates refutes several of Thrasymachus's arguments pertaining to his personal perception of the definition. Furthermore, Socrates counters Thrasymachus's belief that one should be unjust, with the conviction that justice is a trait which one should possess. This particular area of the discussion shows a contrast between the ideas of Socrates and Thrasymachus regarding the term. One of Thrasymachus's arguments that Socrates takes issue with is that in which he states that unjust rulers and cities are the strongest, making justice something that the less powerful and the unwise should aspire to obtain.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this speech, Thrasymachus tells him that he thinks about rulers differently than sheep or cattle and whether it is advantageous for them (343b). “You are so far from understanding justice and what is just, and injustice and what is unjust, that you do not realize that justice is really the good of another, what is advantageous for the stronger and ruler, and harmful to the one who obeys and serves (343c).” Next, the son of Cephalus says that “...injustice rules the simpleminded…” (343c5). A just man, to Thrasymachus always gets less than the unjust one (343d). He continues on to say that injustice is better than justice (344c5-8).…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    End-Term Assignment. Plato- Socrates must prove that justice is choice worthy because of itself and due to its consequences. Socrates also mentions about Individual Justice but shifts its debate on Political Justice. He describes an ideal good city-Kallipolis.…

    • 928 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Books II-IV of Plato’s Republic, Socrates creates an ideal polis, and in doing so finds justice in the soul. The two foundational principles of the ideal city that Socrates creates are self-sufficiency and one-person-one-art, referred to today as specialization. Individual people are not self-sufficient, so the citizens of the city must take up a profession and trade with each other. Socrates and his companions are successful in their search for justice, and are able to reach the answer by considering the classes and their education in an ideal state. Citizens of the ideal city are not able to rely exclusively on themselves, nor are they able to practice a multitude of crafts.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Polemarchus replies that justice is useful in war and peacetime only when it protects objects or money, otherwise a skillful man is preferred. Thus, Socrates concludes that if justice is a craft, it is “only useful for useless things,” such as watching money or a lyre. Furthermore, Polemarchus’ first premise, is critiqued by Plato on the grounds that (1) if justice is a craft, a more skilled individual is more equipped to “give what is owed” than a just one, and (2) that Polemarchus’ argument reduces justice to…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Elaborating the Definition of Justice Plato, the Republic is about the history of political thought, it includes long conversations and arguments among several intellects. Thrasymachus, a fierce fighter, argues that justice is what is good for the stronger and that the unjust man lives a more profitable life than the just man does. Socrates, Plato’s teacher, play the role in defending justice in all these arguments. He praises justices for itself and its consequences. Next, Glaucon and Adeimantus, sons of Ariston, restore Thrasymachus’s argument in a different prospect of perfectly unjust life is better than a perfectly just life.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He believes that justice is living up to your legal obligations and giving what is owed. It is a matter of behaving nicely towards others, a very traditional approach to justice. Meanwhile, Polemarchus believes that it is just to be good to friends and bad to enemies, a very militaristic version of justice. Socrates very easily finds fault in both arguments and refutes both with ease. For both, Socrates appeals to their acceptance of the traditional belief that injustice is shameful because if justice is admirable and injustice is shameful, then justice is good and injustice is bad, which means in no situation would injustice be advantageous, which is untrue and leads to Thrasymachus’…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato’s “Republic” is centered around the notion of justice and how it is beneficial to individuals. The main purpose of the book is to bring forth the conception of what is referred to as “just state.” The book is written in a dialogue form where Plato writes about the different arguments Socrates makes in regards to justice. As humans, we have strong intuitions when we are dealing with matters relating to justice and moral uprightness. Intuitions are influential in what we consider to be justice or unjust as also influences how we judge the actions of others.…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays