The Sarbanes-Oxley Act Of 2002 (SOX)

Great Essays
Following the disastrous impact of a number of corporate and accounting scandals, especially those involving major corporations such as Worldcom and Enron, U.S Congress decided to pass the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (SOX). This had come not long after investors and companies lost billions of dollars due to the result of such corruption, thus having a negative impact on financial markets and investor trust. The enactment of SOX set forth new standards and provisions which sought to improve the accuracy of financial reporting by companies and help protect shareholders and the general public from possible accounting errors or fraudulent activities committed by corporations. Overall, this federal law not only helped revolutionize the importance …show more content…
A nonprofit corporation established by Congress as Title I under the respective bill, the PCAOB is composed of five board members, all of whom are appointed by the SEC and serve staggered five year terms on a full-time basis. These five board members include two certified public accountants (CPAs) and a chairman whom cannot be a practicing CPA in the next five years of the serving term. The four main functions of the PCAOB in overseeing these auditors consist of the following: registration, inspection, enforcement and setting standards. The PCAOB has the authority to register accounting firms which conduct audit reports for issuers, brokers, and dealers. Even accounting firms not located in the United States but still provide audit services for any U.S-based issuer, broker, or dealer are also subject to rules set by the PCAOB. In turn, quality control, audit, and ethical practices are imposed among the registered …show more content…
As a matter of fact, both the chief executive officer (CEO) and chief financial officer (CFO) of a public company are primarily responsible for the accuracy, documentation and submission of all financial reports along with establishing and maintaining the firm’s internal controls. The CEO and CFO are also required to certify the company’s quarterly and annual financial statements and evaluate the effectiveness of the company’s disclosure controls and procedures. According to the new “Exchange Act”, an update to the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, these “disclosure controls and procedures” are defined as controls and procedures of the issuer ensuring that the information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports filed or submitted is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC rules. Also, the same information disclosed shall be accumulated and communicated to the issuer’s management, including its CEO and CFO, in order to allow timely decisions relating to the required disclosures. While there is no specific system that is to be implemented according to the rules of the SEC, it’s up to management of a company to decide which procedures and controls are most appropriate, given the firm’s structure, size, capabilities, etc. Since then a number of private sector providers have

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    1. Why did Congress enact the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? What are the major provisions and benefits of the Act? Congress enacted the Sarbanes-Oxley Act in order to protect investors. This was done by improving the accuracy and reliability of corporate disclosures made by in accordance with the securities laws.…

    • 1002 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sarbanes-Oxley Act Memo

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To: Professor Holborn From: Julion Price Re: Does the destruction of grouper that is more than 20 inches violate the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? Date: December 3, 2014 FACTS In 2007, defendant John L. Yates set out with his crew to go fishing in the Gulf of Mexico. A few days later, Officer Jones boarded their ship and examined the fish they were catching. He noticed that 72 of the fish were smaller than 20 inches.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    SOX has its pro’s and con’s. Some claimed that it imposes tremendous new efforts and costs on public companies. On the contrary, others find it as more advantageous. However, if pros outweigh the cons that a company can get, then perhaps it is worth to comply the said law. As discussed in this article, SOX had led to greater internal control of financial reporting, and had increased the expertise and independence among more-focused executives in the organizations.…

    • 238 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 1992, while the COSO model was put in place, its real claim to fame came from the subsequent release of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004. COSO became the most widely used control framework used in managements’ assessment of the internal control environment during this time. However, that is not the model’s sole purpose, as the COSO model is relevant to all companies and institutions when establishing a concrete internal control…

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 2002, Congress signed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) in response to several notorious corporate scandals, including those at Enron/Worldcom. The piece of legislation was aimed to hold corporate officers personally liable and to rebuild public confidence in the corporate sector. SOX, “requires violations of securities laws or breaches of fiduciary responsibility to be reported to either the chief legal officer or CEO of the company by-house attorneys or outside counsel (Reed, & Bogardus, 2015).” While most provisions of SOX are only applicable to public businesses, at least two criminal provisions apply to nonprofit businesses: whistleblower protection and forbidding the destruction, alteration, or concealment of documents or the impediment of investigations. Section 806 created a new federal anti-retaliation protection for corporate whistleblowers.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The PAOB would have its own auditors and according to this act the auditors will work in accordance with well-defined processes and procedures. 3- It also provided external audit independence so that the conflict of interest could be minimized. It is also made clear that what should be the requirements for new auditor approval.…

    • 169 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    La-Z-Boy Case Summary

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages

    PricewaterhouseCoopers, LLP and independent registered public accounting firm audited the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting. Based on that evaluation it was concluded that the internal control over financial reporting was effective. La-Z-Boy has its own Audit Committee. It assists the Board of Directors in its oversight of the integrity and quality of its financial reports, compliance with legal and regulatory requirements and selection of qualified, independent public accounting firm for auditing purposes. Board of Directors & Management…

    • 218 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In 2002 Congress passed the Sarbanes-Oxley Act due to issues related to company executives falsely reporting financial information and practicing poor business ethics. This was passed due to lack of confidence in corporate America, and the demand from people to hold executives accountable for their decisions (Ferrell, Fraedrich, Ferrell, 2015). HealthSouth, one of the largest rehabilitation healthcare providers, was the first company charged under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Richard Scrushy and several other executives were indicted for overstating earnings by over 2.7 billion dollars, and the company was investigated by the Securities Exchange Commission for insider trading. This case has been used to discuss and teach business ethics (Wang, Lin, Ju,…

    • 400 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I agree with the reversal decision made by the Supreme Court. Although Yates altered his catch after his boat was encountered by a Florida fish and wildlife officer, The Sarbanes-Oxley Act which Yates was charged under was established to prohibit corporate and management from knowingly altering or destroying "any record, document, or tangible object" with the intent to obstruct an investigation. While we are all aware that Yates engaged in wrongful doing by tossing the undersized fish out, where do fish come into play when considering the Sarbanes-Oxley Act? Yates argued the phrase "tangible object" in the context of the law was limited to what he believed to be computers, servers, and other storage devices, and I could not agree more with…

    • 328 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Compare and contrast the different federal safeguards that are in place to reduce financial reporting abuse. Why are these considered appropriate safeguards? The Gramm-Leach Bliley Act, which refers to all financial institutions to explain to theis clients all information related to their accounts and keep private information of their customers, the financial institution is also forced to give out customer’s privacy notices to explain their information-sharing practices.…

    • 1110 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The immense pressure that an auditor faces daily is immense. This is due to their nature of work, which is under constant scrutiny. Not only must they perform well for their accounting firm, but they must also be in compliance with their clients and the government regulations, such as the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002(SOX). While I do believe that SOX has addressed many key issues , such as requiring the CEO and the CFO to be held liable for all financial disclosures and has increased the ethical requirements of the corporate audit committee. There are still many problems that have not been dealt with.…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To provide the proper guidance and ensure that companies are adhering to GAAP FASB seeks advisement from the AICPA and depends on the education and resources provided by the institute, to its members, to shape the practices used throughout the industry. In regards to advisement the AICPA supports the FASB’s board by providing technical supports, standard setting through its auditing board, and provide guidelines to CPAs nationwide. In addition to this the AICPA consults with the FSAB on issues facing the industry’s environment, and works to identify and implement a process for evaluating potential changes in recognition, measurement and disclosure from…

    • 924 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Pcob Case

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The PCAOB has the authority to investigate and impose sanctions on those registered accounting firms or individuals who are found in violation of SOX, the rules of the board, or the SEC. Such punishments handed out by the board include: fines, suspending or revoking an auditor’s registration, suspending or even barring an individual from doing business with a public accounting firm. While the PCAOB’s investigations must be confidential and private, its disciplinary hearings also may not be available to the public until the board imposes a penalty for the party in violation. In some cases, however, this hasn’t occurred until a respondent has gotten a chance to obtain SEC review. Lastly, the PCAOB may set standards applying to auditing, quality…

    • 168 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The quality of audits conducted on public companies is questionable. The Public Company Oversight Accounting Board (PCAOB) tries to lessen these concerns through its inspection process. The following report provides an assessment of the PCAOB inspection process. This includes an analysis of how the PCAOB conducts its inspections, the pros and cons of this method, and the pros and cons of conducting inspections on public-company audits.…

    • 239 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX) was enacted in 2002 after a slue of financial fraud cases, such as Enron and WorldCom, emerged. Under SOX, penalties for misstatement of information is serious than prior acts with maximum fines of $5 million and 20 years imprisonment for those employees who are charged with misleading or hiding evidence (Gleason, Madura, & Rosenthal, 2011, p. 25) In addition to fines and imprisonment, Section 304 of SOX mandates that CEOs and…

    • 1043 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays