This “novel agrianism” expanded in massive proportions and promoted an egalitarian ethos, based upon the fairly similar holdings of these independent landed non-aristocrats. Consequently, it was them who provided “the ‘best’ type of government (…) but possible only when they are present in sufficient numbers to prevent class strife between the very rich and the abject poor” (Hanson THE OTHER GREEKS). Thus, the broader oligarchies, which had acquired significant political and military power, emerged as a middle ground between the narrow aristocracy and the direct democracy including the poorest
This “novel agrianism” expanded in massive proportions and promoted an egalitarian ethos, based upon the fairly similar holdings of these independent landed non-aristocrats. Consequently, it was them who provided “the ‘best’ type of government (…) but possible only when they are present in sufficient numbers to prevent class strife between the very rich and the abject poor” (Hanson THE OTHER GREEKS). Thus, the broader oligarchies, which had acquired significant political and military power, emerged as a middle ground between the narrow aristocracy and the direct democracy including the poorest