Paul Simon Graceland Controversy Analysis

Improved Essays
I have never been a fan of Paul Simon’s music. However, the best song off his Graceland album would be, “You Can Call Me Al.” The song has a memorable tune where I can “bob” my head to it. The song holds meaning. It is about becoming aware of your surroundings, which I can easily associate myself with. I have always been drawn to lyrics that make me self-aware.

The Paul Simon Graceland Controversy was about how Paul Simon was going against the apartheid boycott. However, in his mind, he was still protesting against apartheid because he hired black musicians or artist to perform with him. The people of South Africa did not see it that way. The only way a boycott works is by having everyone boycott. Even if that means, breaking all ties with
…show more content…
I think it serves as a lesson to remind us of the wrongdoings we have committed in the past. It makes you feel that you were a part of it, which helps with the healing process. The question asks if the TRC dispensed justice? It depends on how one would define justice. If justice is defined as retributive then no, it was not served. I feel that if I were an individual who lived during the time of apartheid, I would want the perpetrators to be punished for what they did to my family, my friends and to me, but that would bring satisfaction for only me not for others. Justice is served for everybody or for nobody. However, if justice is defined as restorative, then it was dispensed because humanity could be seen working interpersonally instead of one group overruling the other. It ended apartheid and that is what matters most. I think Bishop Tutu’s arguments for Restorative Justice and the TRC was convincing because if we do not forgive others, then we let the past dictate our future and that can lead to a life of destruction. One of my favorite quotes from the Lion King reflects this situation, “The past can hurt. But […] you can either run from it or learn from …show more content…
Retributive Justice inflicts punishment on the wrongdoers. Ubuntu means, in the simplest terms, humanity to others. We are humans through other humans and we cannot become humans alone. Our humanity is to assists one another, when an individual’s humanity is enhanced another’s is enhanced as well. Bishop Tutu says that we cannot become fully human without Ubuntu. Anything that has a negative impact on the good in our lives holds us as prisoners and no one would be able to move on. Therefore, Bishop Tutu says that accepting the concept of Restorative Justice is the only means of restoring relationships since humans need

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In “The Case of Reparations” Ta-Nehisi Coates goes over the legacy of slavery, discrimination, segregation, and the branches of it such as the times of Jim Crow and the countless unfavorable situations of African Americans encounter during that time. He emphasized the biased real estate agents of the 1960s to be more specific in North Lawndale, Chicago which follows the journey of Clyde Ross. Coates used Clyde Ross to set a foundation for his essay that tells a story of the society and kleptocracy in the time of Jim Crow within that he discusses the wealth gaps and the distant meanings of black and white poverty and society’s attempt to heal the bleeding wounds that Jim Crow left through reparations. Slavery was the pillar that held America’s economic development that collapsed on it 250 years later. Even though slavery was abolished, it still left a bad seed under the American economy.…

    • 774 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Whether if the past is favourable or not, and whether if you want it to be or not, it will always be part of who you were, part who you are, and part of who you will be. Therefore, denying your past, becomes denying yourself. In order to overcome the past, you must be able to bravely look back at your past, and solve the remaining harsh feelings. You should never let your past be the obstacles of building an improved…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this essay I will discuss two approaches to punishment which are retributivism, also known as non-consequentialism, and utilitarianism, also known as consequentialism. I will then analyse three justifications of punishment within the utilitarian approach which are reform and rehabilitation, individual and general deterrence and incapacitation. Retributivism is a sociological perspective of crime which looks at the different forms and changes in punishment. It is a backward thinking approach as it does not look at future consequences of punishment and is mostly concerned with offences already committed and getting ‘justice’. This approach is considered similar to ‘an eye for an eye’ as it is based on the idea that if we inflict harm on another…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Restorative justice makes it possible for the victims family to have closure. In addition, Kumar achieved his goal in writing a convincing argument by asking questions in his article. The questions he had about restorative justice were able to be answered clearly. Showing that restorative justice is a beneficial…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This sense of unity allowed more individuals a sense of comfortability to push forward with garnering a restitution case. To be clear there were pushes for restitution from the late 1930s well into the 1990s, but the difficulty was that the fate of these restitution cases was being carried out by governments not by individuals (p.63) who were not too concerned with cases of restitution while impending a…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Martin Luther King Jr. did everything non-violently. He had many speeches about had non-violence and he reflected it in his preaching. His non-violence was reflected in many big things. One major thing was the Montgomery Bus Boycott.…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice and Forgiveness are almost complete opposites in terms of action and message. These two concepts simply cannot be used hand and hand in their simplest form. Justice and Forgiveness are two completely different concepts both with their own varying amounts and technicalities. These two can be used separately but never simultaneously for the same purpose. Many stories touch upon the weight of forgiveness and its properties as well as the destruction of revenge acting as justice.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People boycott for many reasons. They may stand up because of what they believe in or think in. Well boycott is pretty much for what you stand up for in what you think is right or wrong. Does not really matter what it is but it is your decision.…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history people have always attempted to eliminate each other for various reasons. In April 1994 Rwanda was in a brutal between the ethnic groups the Hutus and Tutsis. The Hutus led a genocide against another ethnic group the Tutsi in a gruesome civil war. Jean Hatzfeld’s book Machete Season: The Killers in Rwanda Speak. Hatzfeld interviews with a group of Hutu mass murderers that were all friends and came from the same region.…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Who created restorative justice and why? “Restorative justice is a young field that emerged during the 1990’s as alternative approaches to the court process, such as alternative dispute resolution, were becoming a national trend”. This means restorative justice emerged in the 1990’s and was one of the many alternative justice system to a court process that became a national trend (Armour, restorative justice). Restorative justice was created so criminals learned about how their crime affected the victim. It was also created so the criminal learned how their crime affected the community of the victim.…

    • 133 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On November 7, 2014, Thomas MacMillan wrote an article of why Restorative Justice Can Bring About the Healing Process. Restorative Justice is, “ Participants gather in circles to try to resolve problems through discussion, rather retribution.” So why would Restorative Justice not work if it helps people heal. Three good reasons why Restorative Justice does work is because it stops student violence, reduces suspensions, and helps troubled teens to open up to the problem.…

    • 385 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Moreover, when people forgive their offenders, it shows that justice has been served. Furthermore, when people do what is just, by forgiving their offenders, their view of the world will change. One of the reasons why forgiveness and justice go hand in hand is when an immoral person receives retributive justice, it causes people to repent on their wrongdoings thus making them a better person when they’re also forgiven by their victims. Take, for example, the older brother from “What We Plant We Will Eat”. At the beginning of the story, he was arrogant and kicked his younger brother out…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Restorative Justice and practices are being implemented around the globe and are becoming a powerful and effective alternative in responding to crime and conflict. People have been dissatisfied and are frustrated with the operation of the criminal justice system. In today’s criminal justice system, the idea of justice means imposing suffering on the offender to balance or compensate for the victim’s sufferings and losses. Although the criminal law aims to bring social order and peace, many believe it does not offer the chance for relationship building, forgiveness, reconciliation, healing, and communication. Consequently, many countries have found it useful to adopt restorative practices when addressing crime and conflict.…

    • 562 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    A brief review of the book “The Little Book of Restorative Justice,” by Howard Zehr, is based upon one idea, how should this society respond to wrong doings and what should be done with the victims and offenders? The book begins by telling us that the criminal justice system is not meeting the needs of the people with in that system, ultimately the system is failing however there still may be some good qualities. Zehr expresses that, “restorative justice is an attempt to address some of the needs and limitations,” (3) and by doing this he first tells his audience what restorative justice is not, to give us, his readers a better understanding of what it really is. Also to you could say that he does this so we can have a stronger foundation while learning what, The Little Book of Restorative Justice,” is and not being completely biased…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Restorative Justice Case Study

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 18 Works Cited

    Introduction: Restorative justice is the idea that harm caused by a crime can be repaired (Wallis, 2007) and that the victim and community can be restored to how it was previously, rather than resorting to punishing the offender…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 18 Works Cited
    Great Essays