Camp David Accords Case Study

Improved Essays
The organization of Maoz-Israel cited in 2002 that: "There are currently about 30 terrorist attacks per day in this tiny country of 5.2 million Jews. What if there were 30 terrorist attacks per day in Chicago or Los Angeles or Paris or London?" (“War” n. pag.). The Camp David Accords since the 1978 signing did not help in the Middle East, as stated in a study of Israeli terrorist attacks in 2002. U.S. President, Jimmy Carter, wished to help with Middle Eastern peace but everything he tried did not help. To help with the Middle East crisis, he started by learning about the background of the conflicts in the Middle East. Once he knew a significant amount about the Israeli Palestinian Conflict, he decided to hold a summit in Camp David, Maryland …show more content…
On August 5th, 1978, Carter invited Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin to Camp David to begin the peace negotiation process. Both agreed to arrive at Camp David because they had these words in their head, “The people of the Middle East yearn for peace so that the vast human and natural resources of the region can be turned to the pursuits of peace and so that this area can become a model for coexistence and cooperation among nations” (“Carter” n. pag.). The people living in the Middle East know that it is important to have peace between surrounding countries not only because it is beneficial to everyone, but they want to be examples for religions able to coexistence. Because a few Middle Eastern countries want peace, specifically Egypt and Israel, they accepted Carter’s invitation and arrived at Camp David on September 5th, 1978. The summit lasted a total of 13 days after September 5th, 1978. Carter thought that peace in the Middle East was not just important for the U.S., but for the world because the Middle East had oil that everyone could use. Since Carter did not want the whole world to know about what was happening in the Middle East, he chose to not have the media involved. The media broadcasted about the peace summit, but they were never given the day-by-day status. By doing this, Carter eliminated the chance of the media …show more content…
The Agreement was split into two separate documents and one concerned Arab-Israeli issues and the other concerned Egyptian-Israeli issues. The first document was called, “Framework for Peace in the Middle East Agreed at Camp David.” This document concerned the future of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, the Palestinian refugee issue, and a five year transitional period. The five year transitional period had to do with how Israel would withdraw from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The idea was for the Israeli Military to slowly leave the area allowing the Palestinians to take over and have an elected government, but Israel was able to stay in a few areas for their safety. The second document of the Camp David Accords was the “Framework for the Conclusion of a Peace Treaty Between Egypt and Israel.” This document dealt with Egyptian-Israeli agreements and how they will create peace. It mentioned what the future was for the Sinai Peninsula, and that it would be returned to Egypt in three to nine months after the Accords were signed, but Israel was going to be allowed to have a few security zones. The other topic the second document mentioned, was the relationship that Israel and Egypt would have. Arguments were later started because the future of the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem, which were both occupied by Israel, were not mentioned in the Accord, and so the Arabs wanted to take both. This caused Begin to act, and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Ap Euro Chapter 13 Outline

    • 4056 Words
    • 17 Pages

    After the Statement was written conflicts came about between the Palestinians and the Jewish…

    • 4056 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Balfour Declaration Dbq

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages

    One turning point in the movement to support the creation of Israel was the Balfour declaration issued by the British government in 1917. This becomes both a powerful document, as a very strong endorsement of a Jewish national home in Palestine, but it is also a controversial one. It is argued by many that the provision for protecting the rights of non-Jewish Palestinians has been disregarded since the creation of the modern state of Israel. The encouragement given by the Balfour Declaration is a major factor in the massive migration of Jews from all parts of the world and eventually paved way for the formation of the State of Israel. One turning point in Israeli-Arab relations was the Camp David Accords, signed by President Jimmy Carter, Egyptian…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    However, Stadt knew this would be difficult, because of the close relations between Israel and the United States. In the end Stadt received the Sinai Peninsula, but for the rest of the territory the Arabs would have to deal with Israel and Jordan to see who would gain control of the areas. This however, left Stadt in a fire storm with the Palestinians. For Carter the issues with the Israel and Palestine would be a whole another problem in itself. He realized that when it came to making peace the policy would first have to get both sides to recognize each other.…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What Reagan administration did during the Contra-Iran Affair was wrong from a political, ethical, and moral standpoint. From a strategic standpoint, there is a different story. In regards to the Iran-Iraq war, the main objective of Reagan’s administration was revealed, which was to lengthen the Iran-Iraq war. The US (along with Israel and its European allies) did not want a powerful Iran under the rule of Islamic Republic. They saw the Islamic Republic of Iran as a force that challenges the interests of the west in the region.…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Israel Dbq

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    (Doc. 7) However, the US wasn’t the only country realizing Israel needed help defending itself from violence within the country. Egypt decided to form a peace agreement for the Israelis and the Palestinians, knowing this would help end their rivalry. The President of Egypt at this time claimed new powers over the two groups and mandated it as so. The point of view is from the President of Egypt who knew closely of the struggles in Israel and knew a good temporary way to fix thing was to demand a peace agreement between the two warring states.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Jimmy Carter Dbq Analysis

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A strength that came from Carter’s motto and actions was that there was very little violence to show a general idea of peace, but a weakness in using fairness and not force is that now Carter along with the U.S. government and citizens are all seen as scared and weak. This is not good because other nations and countries think that they are stronger than us, giving them the mindset of being able to start a war against the U.S. thinking they will win, totally overlooking Carter’s intentions of his…

    • 811 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The enduring value of specific texts is shaped by their ability to sustainably integrate meaning and purpose with form and language whilst simultaneously adopting rhetorical characteristics of ethos, logos and pathos that resonates with given audiences. Alas, based on overall textual integrity and reception of texts are they considered to have an enduring worth capable of transcending time and place. Margaret Atwood’s, ‘Spotty –Handed Villainesses’ and Anwar Sadat’s ‘Speech to the Israeli Knesset’ are two speeches that respectively challenge societal concerns through personal or shared experience and additionally provoke thought for direction and vision through relevant rhetorical devices that allow them to connect with their given context.…

    • 991 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Canadian Peacekeeping

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    B. Pearson, a Canadian delegation to the UN, suggested a peaceful diplomatic resolution to the Suez Crisis, stating, “peace is far more than ceasing to fire.” Pearson’s solution ceased bombing attacks in Egypt and brought peace to the Mediterranean. Pearson not only the 1957 Nobel Peace Prize but also, highlighted Canada’s reputation as a…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of the prison camps in North Korea? Many people do not know what they are. North Korean prison camps have existed ten times a longer than the Nazi Concentration Camps. Shin was born in Camp 14, a prison camp with no release for the inmates.…

    • 541 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So Sadat conceived of a daring plan to attack Israel again, which, even if unsuccessful, might convince the Israelis that peace with Egypt was necessary. ”(History.com 2010) In 1978, President Carter got Israel and Egypt’s presidents together to talk about a treaty, which is now known as the Camp David Accords. The impacts of the Camp David Accords created peace between Israel And Egypt and limited the chance of war between the two countries.…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jaber al-Ahmed al-Jaber al-sabah had taken a stand in order to defend his country ,Kuwait, from the wrath of Saddam Hussein. On August 2, 1990 the country of Kuwait was invaded by Iran causing the start of the Gulf War. A massive attack was led by the dictator of Iran ,Saddam Hussein. The raid killed thousands and led to the destruction of over 700 thriving Kuwaiti oil refineries. Saddam’s actions had later constructed the beginning of the gulf war, an international conflict that had recrudescence during the the late 1980’s and early 1990’s.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Sowing Crisis explains how the Cold war and policies taken by the U.S. have spilled over into today and how it has affected modern U.S. relations with the Middle East. Rashid Khalidi feels that wartime and postwar moves in North Africa and Iran, as well as U.S. air bases in Saudi Arabia, Libya, Morocco, and Turkey, marked the beginning of “an American role as the major Middle Eastern Power, a reality that was masked for a time by the power and proximity to the region of the USSR (Page 9).” Khalidi believes that since the end of the cold war the U.S’s interest in the Middle East has grown greater and greater, like the Gulf war of 1991, and the Oslo accords in 1993. He closes the opening chapter by asking how the U.S. got itself into this situation…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Oslo Accords were the name given to two sets of agreements between the government of Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO). These accords signified a drastic change in relationship between the two parties. “The Oslo Accords marked the first time that the state of Israel and the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO) formally recognized one another, and publicly committed to negotiate a solution to their decades-long conflict based on territorial compromise” (Al Jazeera America). There are two parts that make up the Oslo Peace Process. The first was “The Declaration of Principles for Establishing Palestinian Self Rule”, AKA Oslo I, which was signed on the 13th of September in 1993 (Shulman, 1993, 793).…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Since the mid-twentieth century, Jews have been migrating to the land of Israel, known by the Arabs as Palestine, to escape the discrimination and persecution they had been facing in Europe for centuries. The Zionist movement began to grow as a result of the Holocaust, as the Jews believe they have a right to their own Jewish state where their holy sites are. However, the Arabs have been living in Palestine for generations, and they are unwilling to accept the formation of a Jewish state because of the Palestinian cultural and ancestral ties that exist in that land. Because both the Palestinians and Jews are obdurate and will not forswear the land they both feel they have a right to, the Arab-Israeli conflict is an incredibly complicated issue.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    No one truly knows the story behind this conflict so we can’t expect the Israelis and…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics