Humanity In Thomas Hobbes Leviathan

Improved Essays
Humanity, at its roots are a skittish, distrustful bunch, whom given the proper provocation, can lash out at their closest friends or form pacts with their mortal enemies. This is the nature that Thomas Hobbes describes in his reading “Leviathan”, which is his thesis on the nature of humans in regards to one and other, as well as their motives for the treatment they give. In mythology, a Leviathan is a massive sea beast described in the Christian Bible, and in his novel Hobbes draws parallels between this massive beast and human nature, describing humanity as an ultimately selfish and gluttonous creature who serves only itself. This reading provided by Hobbes is a valid and very insightful claim based around real human behaviours and how our mistrust of one and other clearly resonates in actions that seem otherwise monotonous or normal. In chapter thirteen of his thesis, he goes to great pains to describe the nature of humans when faced with competition, whether it is in minor details or in raging warfare.

The reading cites many different human behaviours that nearly every human find them self a victim of (unless you are truly naïve or overtly trusting). He begins with the broad statement that all human being are born equal
…show more content…
His description of humanity, describing how little we trust one and other despite our claims to the contrary. We bar our windows, arm out selves, travel in groups and double lock our doors to protect ourselves from the people around us we claim to be on the same side as, all to serve the some means to an end. To become the superior person, someone so ideal and infallible that no man can best them. We strive to gain status as a means of protection, as when our reputation precedes us, people are less likely to challenge us for fear of retribution, furthering out security against other humans. After all, a king can have a castle of knights but only one key to his

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    There are two types of people in the world at any given second: the powerful and the powerless. Everyone is capable of being both. Saying something such as this may not make sense right now, but it is a very important thing that everyone needs to know. This is what John Steinbeck’s Of Mice and Men and Robert Burns’s “To a Mouse” teach us about the way that the world operates. These pieces of writing also show us that there isn’t always a happy ending for everyone because of people who have power over other people.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the book The Brother Karamazov, two of the major themes that are discussed in the chapter of Rebellion are the contrasting relationships between naturalism and Christianity in relation to suffering. To better understand the relationship between both of these differing beliefs, it is best understood from the main character’s perspective, who is Ivan. He does not endorse either naturalism or Christianity because he believes that neither of them are the solution to stop the suffering in the society. Also, he believes that they are both equally and morally unjust and lack accountability among its offenders and followers.…

    • 463 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In an excerpt from Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes, he describes his theory about the conditions of a society which has no governing body to control it. When there is no government, we live in a state of nature; a state of total freedom where we can do whatever we want at any time. If there is no government, there are no set laws, and therefore no limits on human actions. There are also no formal consequences for actions that may cause harm to others. You could do anything you want if it will benefit you since there is no sure punishment.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I truly believe that genetics are by far one of the biggest factors in determining the action and/or morals of an individual. In this debate, I personally agree with Thomas Hobbes in the idea that the nature of man is evil and as he states, “Everything humans beings voluntarily do is for pleasure or for self-preservation.” I feel this concept is heavily shown through the fact that all human beings react differently if put in the same situation. This shows that even though one's environment will be the same as someone else’s, people's personality determines the morals and decisions made by said individual. For example, some criminals have safe surroundings and good environments, but still make the conscious decision to commit a felony.…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The views of Thomas Hobbes in Leviathan are exemplified in his views that obedience is key to human salvation, and that war and violence are merely the cause of the nature of man. The contrasting views on freedom show the difference in philosophy, and the contrasting views of violence and nonviolence show the difference in how to achieve such…

    • 1218 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He does this by describing selfishness as "a passionate and exaggerated love of self that causes man to relate everything to himself alone," and individualism as "a reflective and peaceable sentiment that disposes each citizen to . . . withdraw to one side with his family and friends" (p. 482). The way in which individualism caused people to separate from society with only their friends and family caused a problem, in that, by doing so a public conscience can not be established. Individualism leads to a slowdown of democratic culture and the results in such "fabric of time is torn at every moment and the trace of generations is effaced"…

    • 1310 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William Stafford uses language to depict the attitude of the speaker in “A Ritual to Read to Each Other”. He uses repetition of the first line to emphasize his point that the speaker and the reader are strangers, as with most people in the world, therefore one should not be quick to judge others. Stafford uses a descriptive metaphor in the poem about elephants holding each other’s tail. The speaker uses this unique example as an image that the reader can get about the ceaseless chain of conformity and unoriginality in society. He makes a strong hyperbole when he states that knowing what occurs but not recognizing the fact is quite possibly the root of all cruelty.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein is a novel about a monster that was created by a human. The monster was abandoned by his creator as well as the society right after he was born. Mary Shelley presented the ideas of many writers in her novel, Frankenstein, and this essay will explore the ideas put forth by different writers that are connected to Shelly’s Frankenstein.…

    • 1241 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When you are posed with the question if human beings are inherently good or bad, you often find yourself floundered to find an answer. It is a fundamental question with no definite answer, only your conception of situations and human beings. People often look for the bad in the world, they point out the negative things instead of the positive because that’s what people want to hear about. The positive things are overlooked, which concludes with people believing that humans are inherently bad. Unfortunately, they do not recognize the many positive actions of others.…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Hobbes and Niccolo Machiavelli, both grappling with regional instability and constant war, arrive at different frameworks for handling man’s inherent propensity for conflict from very similar models of human behavior. Hobbes, watching his fellow countrymen fight each other during the English Civil War, decided that humans perpetually desire more power to secure their well-being and therefore incline toward warfare as a means to achieve this. Machiavelli, similarly accustomed to the restless Italian Peninsula, also labeled man as power-hungry and self-centered, always striving for enough freedom to ensure one’s prosperity. In the absence of the structure and organization provided by a government, a situation dubbed mankind’s ‘natural…

    • 1255 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This is a paper comparing the Aristotle and Hobbes understandings of human nature. Aristotle states that man is a “political animal”, and that it is thus natural for man to live in a polis. Hobbes disagrees with this understanding of man a political animal, as he claims that man is actually a greedy being that is driven by power. Thus he feels that the natural state of man is a state of war. Although the two disagree initially about the man’s natural state, Aristotle comes to agree with Hobbes’ view since they agree that without a common sense of justice that individuals have no reason to live together.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Friedrich Nietzsche on Master and Slave Morality,” an explication by Dr. John Armstrong, explains Friedrich Nietzsche's view on morality that argues Slave Morality is created to restrict “superior” people. To achieve such a claim, Armstrong compares and explains Master Morality and Slave Morality, and he further reveals the flaws of Slave Morality, “[the] artificial boundaries that constrain the strong from reaching their full potential” (5). Opening his analysis, Armstrong chronicles the history of Master and Slave Morality and informs the readers about Friedrich Nietzsche and his motivation for exploring the difference between these moralities. Armstrong reveals that Nietzsche, a philologist, values Master Morality over Slave Morality since it leads to the “peak of Western civilization” (1). Yet, many religions value Slave Morality instead.…

    • 777 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To begin, Thomas Hobbes was a pessimist towards human nature, strongly believing that humans were born greedy and hostile. To support his perceptions, Hobbes wrote Leviathan,…

    • 909 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Life in the State of Nature was describes by Hobbes as being ‘solitary’, ‘poor’, ‘nasty’, ‘brutish’, and ‘short’. Hobbes also believed humans have a natural desire for security and order. And in order to secure self-protection and to avoid misery and pain, societies began entering into contracts. These ideas of self-defense are inherent to human nature and in order to achieve this people would voluntarily surrender their rights and freedoms to a Leviathan via contract who would command obedience. This led…

    • 1704 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes and Locke are both social contract theorists who have influenced many citizens of this country. To begin, they both start out talking about human nature. Locke and Hobbes had very different views regarding human nature. Locke claimed human nature as reason and Hobbes claimed it as power and appetite. Locke believes that reason is the primary attribute of human nature.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays