In Mary Shelly's “Frankenstein”, the relationship between creator and created is scrutinized and put up to the test as Victor neglects his creation causing his rampage. Yet Victor himself is quite hypocritical when speaking on the malignancy of the monster, as in many cases he himself exemplifies many of the characteristics that the creature posses such as both seek the destruction of the others as well as the damnation layer upon both for the nefarious actions committed. However, they are still quite different in that unlike Victor, the monster directly carried out many malicious attacks and in most cases taking pride in them, in addition to the was each of them assign blame as victor takes self pity in his situation unlike the creature is
…show more content…
For all the agony he bestowed on to others, he finally accepts his punjsiment of damnation to hell. This is very similar to when the creature in his plea, similar to his appeal to Victor, accepts his fate to eternal suffering for his actions. Recognizing contently his faith, he utters “I am content to suffer alone”(Shelly 425). Homologous to Victor’s admittance, the monster comes to terms with his retribution. Yet unlike Victor, who used such words as chained, is much more comfortable accepting this fate. Instead, he uses content, not chained, showing he is accepting and free in that, unlike Victor who is chained and cannot move past these circumstances. This underlying principle of the toleration of the eternal damnation show that the mental state in terms of acceptance are in very similar states. Showing that, both beings have seen the same info and come to the same conclusion, based off the adversity of others, their everlasting resting place. This example of similarity is corroborated by the yearning of each to lay destruction upon the other. Speaking in the vengeance of his lost companions, he desire the destruction he se …show more content…
He covets the day that he could have fulfilled his retaliation against the monster for all the misery he had endured due to him saying “The task of his destruction was mine, but I have failed.”(Shelly 417). This statement epitomizes the journey he had just taken to accomplish that task that would fulfill that satisfy that thirst for reprisal that only the ultimate destruction, in his eyes, that would quench it. Yet this statement is quite hypocritical in that the whole reason he
For all the agony he bestowed on to others, he finally accepts his punjsiment of damnation to hell. This is very similar to when the creature in his plea, similar to his appeal to Victor, accepts his fate to eternal suffering for his actions. Recognizing contently his faith, he utters “I am content to suffer alone”(Shelly 425). Homologous to Victor’s admittance, the monster comes to terms with his retribution. Yet unlike Victor, who used such words as chained, is much more comfortable accepting this fate. Instead, he uses content, not chained, showing he is accepting and free in that, unlike Victor who is chained and cannot move past these circumstances. This underlying principle of the toleration of the eternal damnation show that the mental state in terms of acceptance are in very similar states. Showing that, both beings have seen the same info and come to the same conclusion, based off the adversity of others, their everlasting resting place. This example of similarity is corroborated by the yearning of each to lay destruction upon the other. Speaking in the vengeance of his lost companions, he desire the destruction he se …show more content…
He covets the day that he could have fulfilled his retaliation against the monster for all the misery he had endured due to him saying “The task of his destruction was mine, but I have failed.”(Shelly 417). This statement epitomizes the journey he had just taken to accomplish that task that would fulfill that satisfy that thirst for reprisal that only the ultimate destruction, in his eyes, that would quench it. Yet this statement is quite hypocritical in that the whole reason he