The Little Albert Experiment

Great Essays
Uncovering the Truth and Procedures about Little Albert Experiment One of the most popular and critiqued experiment known is “Little Albert”, conducted by the behaviorist John B. Watson and his student Rosalie Rayner. Many contradictions and critics have risen since this experiment became public because the experiment was run in an eight-month old infant. In addition, the reason why people were tremendously against and highly critiqued the experiment is because the experiment was conducted in an infant; this would be cataloged as unethical because they inserted a life-long fear in the child without thinking on the consequences or problems that could bring to the child. Moreover, there are some rumors that the mother didn’t give Watson permission to conduct the experiments in her son and as soon as she discovered the truth she took away her son without leaving any information. Others disagree and say she knew about the experiments but she was a low class nurse who was afraid of the wealthy persons who were in charge of the hospital she was working for. Although many …show more content…
According to C., J author fo the article “Another Twist in the Little Albert Tale” mentions how Douglas became terribly sick and experienced ventricular, lumbar punctures, swelling in his brain and a cerebral infection when he was only six weeks old (180). According to the author Douglas did not only suffer from physical problems but mental problems as well.
Additionally, it’s extremely important to discover if Little Albert was mentally delayed because that could have affected the experiment. Merritte had such severe health problems that it’s understandable the way he would behave during the experiment. Ultimately, it’s important to understand that by hiding that the infant was mentally impair, Watson would beneficiate because it was easier for Watson to show results in a healthy baby than a mental delayed

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The people were yet pressured by the authority to continue and keep causing harm to the student which would make the experiment unethical. Overall, I feel like this was a successful experiment and the studies were efficient or…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Henrietta Lacks Eugenics

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages

    I believe that she was not a victim of the eugenics program, in spite the fact that she still became sterile after being given cancer treatment. Through…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    School Belt Experiment

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages

    At the beginning of this experiment, the experimenter asks the child to separate the cards into a white and black stack. After the child has done so, the experimenter asks the child to now separate the cards depending on the shape that is on the card: heart or a star. The child will tend to get less correctly when asked to stack the cards depending on their shape. This was very interesting because it goes to show that children tend to perseverate, which means that they tend to get stuck to thinking about the rules that they were initially exposed to. They do not chose to ignore the second set of rules; it is just too much for them to actually remember.…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this is a largely simplistic view of the results of the experiments. The participants did not simply obey the person of authority named the experimenter. As demonstrated in the extensive video footage of the experiments, many of them exhibited great distress and tension, attempted to refuse participation, and tried to reason with the experimenter (Milgram, 1962). While it can be argued that a reasonable person could simply exit the room to leave or to check on the other participant receiving the shocks, the situation prevented this action, not physically, but psychologically. In turn, it may be argued that rather than obedience to orders, the participants of this study succumbed to incessant…

    • 919 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When Henrietta informed the doctors of her sickness, they were not inclined to believe or treat her because they saw how Henrietta's…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Doctors of today have advanced tools and technology to look at an embryo and tell if it is healthy and ready for life. Many mothers experience complication in pregnancy that can lead to a child being born with disabilities. As stated in JUSTIFYING INFANTICIDE AND NON-VOLUNTARY EUTHANASIA By Peter Singer, infants can be born with “irreversible intellectual disabilities, will never be rational, self-conscious beings.” With the knowledge of the child’s health before birth it gives a morally difficult question to answer. Should the child be born?…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to the questionnaire Milgram sent to the participants, 84% said they were pleased that they had participated in the experiment, roughly 15% were neither pleased nor regretful, and approximately 1% of participants regretted their involvement (Baumrind 95). With these results, Milgram would also likely refute Baumrind’s claims by retorting that either the experiment was not emotionally damaging in the first place, or that the reconciliation he arranged between the participant and actor was sufficient to alleviate the emotional damage. Based on his article “Experimental Ethics,” Ph.D. Alan C. Elms would agree with Milgram, and claims the additional measures Milgram took to ensure the participants’ welfare were unprecedented in most other psychological experiments: Milgram arranged for a psychiatrist to meet with the participants a year later, and no signs of harm were reported (Elms). If Baumrind’s claim that Milgram’s efforts to alleviate emotional damage were not sufficient, then the survey Milgram sent to participants would reveal that a significantly larger percentage of participants regretted their involvement; however, the results prove otherwise, rendering Baumrind’s argument invalid and therefore ineffective while Milgram’s claims are effective with Elms and the survey results supporting his…

    • 1100 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1962, Stanley Milgram surprised the world with his study on obedience. To test his theory he invented an electronic box that would become a window into human cruelty. In ascending order, a row of buttons marked the amount of voltage one person would inflict upon another. Milgram’s original motive for the experiment was to understand the unthinkable: How could the German people permit the extermination of the Jews? Stanley Milgram wanted to understand the necessary conditions in which a person would obey an authority who commanded actions that went against conscience.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two psychological experimenters attempted to uncover the most brutal area of the human brain in their articles: Milgram 's "The Perils of Obedience" and Zimbardo 's "The Stanford Prison Experiment". The first and earliest of these experimenters was Stanley Milgram, who conducted his experiments at Yale University. He starts the article with information on testing whether or not a person would administer painful—and eventually lethal—shocks to other people when given the order by an authoritative person in the room with the ‘teacher’. His results were indeed surprising: twenty-five people out of forty administered lethal shocks when instructed. He includes excerpts from the experiment to add to his argument.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This Code of Conduct established by the American Psychological Association effectively supports Baumrind by articulating how psychologists should aspire to create trusting relations with people whom they work (“Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct”). Milgram might refute these criticisms by claiming the subjects could trust the experimenter on the basis that he, the experimenter, was accountable for any harm caused by the subject. Milgram mentions this detail numerous times throughout his narratives of the experiment in “The Perils of Obedience” (Milgram 81, 83). In response to Milgram’s refute, Baumrind would likely debate how Milgram deceived his subjects about the purpose of the experiment. Milgram compelled his subjects to believe that they were not the focal point of the experiment but rather a supplementary aspect (Milgram 78).…

    • 1334 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When a scientist decides to test the limits of the human condition, the ethicality and basis of the experiment are called into question. The main character and scientist Aylmer from the short story “The Birthmark” has such questions directed against him by the readers and modern societies. The question of whether or not his methods were ethical relies in the compliance of his subject of experimentation, his wife Georgiana, and in this case his subject agrees to whatever methods he deems necessary. Furthermore, the evidence presented within the text perceives Aylmer for what he truly is: a human being seeking perfection. The scientific experiment he engages in does not push boundaries because, at that period in history, humans were experimenting…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The main conflict of Milgram 's experience which can be argued for both sides, that really settled the point where the experiment became unethical was the fact that patients could be considered to be psychologically harmed, even though the debriefing and explanations it could still have an effect on patient mind and…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Experiment In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram (1993-1984) began an experiment that would test to see how obedient people would be no matter the circumstances. One experiment Milgram performed consisted of volunteers shocking someone they did not know if he or she did not answer a question correctly. As the questions are answered incorrectly, the voltage would rise. Unknown to the volunteer, the subject that is being shocked is an actor that is not being electrocuted, and the volunteer was the subject of the experiment. As the experiment continued, the volunteers began to become stressed (Taylor, Peplau, & Sears, 2005, p. 228).…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Albert Bandura supported both Classical Conditioning and Operant Conditioning; however, he combined his own thoughts together to create the Social Learning Theory. His study, The Bobo Doll Experiment, reviewed how children learn through observation, specifically aggression. Bandura’s conclusions revealed that both genders of children in the aggressive role model group were much more violent compared to the non-aggressive model and the control group (McLeod). People are not born with a certain type of personality or behavior within them. Observations are made as a child to learn what should be done based on adults.…

    • 1320 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Little Albert experiment had some ethical violations in the study that may have not been known during the time which the experiment took place. One violation was the principle of informed consent. Within this principle, the subject is supposed to be given as much information as possible on the study, and how it will affect them. The subject is also told that they have the right to withdraw from the experiment. Little Albert and his mother was not told any of this before the experiment began.…

    • 358 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays