Essay On Humanitarian Interventionism

Superior Essays
Humanity is not always found in humanitarian intervention. The pursuit of safeguarding the rights of all those in the “spectrum of races and religions” has its basis in the idea that human rights are self-evident and universal. The protection of universal rights has been allotted to nations who hold great power yet these nations assume that genocide is a concept of the past-with the tragedies of each new genocide isolated from those of the previous genocide. Two genocides commonly cited by humanitarian interventionists – the Armenian and Rwandan genocides demonstrate the consequences of lack of involvement and a lack of moral will on the part of the United States government. Yet by failing to recognize the challenges that come with foreign intervention, humanitarian interventionists render themselves blind to the …show more content…
Before intervention, the urge to amend human rights violations precede the challenges of reconstruction; without necessary knowledge, there is a possibility of a resurgence by the opposition force. Also, humanitarian interventionists fail to recognize that s genocides can be response to civil war. In these cases, foreign intervention would most likely accelerate the speed of the killings, therefore, putting more lives at risk. Concerning foreign intervention, the American public should be able to receive enough information to press for action from their government. If not enough information has been provided, the government does not have the right make a decision that which eventually go against the wants of the American public. The drive to help the needy is an honorable one however, sometimes that drive hinders, rather than helps those who need to protect their human rights from

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rwandan Genocide Doc 1

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages

    After the Holocaust, the world had promised that they would “never again let anything like this happen.” In the spring of 1994, all hell broke loose as one million people died in the Rwandan Genocide. What happened to the promise to never let another genocide occur again Racism, competition of land between Hutu and Tutsi, and denying the situation in Rwanda as genocide, the killings occurred and continued for 100 long days. However, that all happened because of European colonization in Africa. Doc 1, by Gerard Prunier, states how the Belgians divided Rwanda people based on physical features. Doc 2, by Jared Diamond, shows the population density of Rwanda compared to the rest of the world. Lastly, Doc 3 was a press briefing explaining how and why the U.S. did not use the word ‘genocide’.…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humanitarian intervention in simple terms is intervention in a state by another when there is gross violation of human rights in that state. This evolved from the concept of that everyone had a “duty to assist people in danger”. The doctrine of “humanitarian intervention” has long been a controversial subject, both in law and in international relations, and remains so today.…

    • 676 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War often carries enormous human costs, but we recognize that the imperative of stopping or preventing genocide or other systematic slaughter can sometimes justify the use of military force. For that reason, Human Rights Watch has on rare occasion advocated humanitarian intervention—for example, to stop ongoing genocide in Rwanda and Bosnia.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Military intervention in Rwanda in 1994 to prevent or stop genocide would have been just such a case. However, intervention should be a truly last resort.” (Mark P. Lagon, http://www.cfr.org/democratization/promoting­democracy­whys­hows­united­states­internationa l­community/p24090 )…

    • 1177 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    As morality cannot be condensed on a finite plane, ideals and their end goals differ from person to person. In the essay “Bystanders to Genocide,” Samantha Power is livid at the fact that the United States had an incredible amount of opportunities to intervene in Rwanda, yet the administration decided not to because it was not in the U.S.’s best interests to intervene (Power). Power likely believes that every life should be cherished and should be safeguarded no matter what. Power suggests that when someone is endangered, the immediate reaction should be to help them for the simple preservation of man. On the other hand, in “Humanitarian Hazard: Revisiting Doctrines of Intervention,” Alan J. Kuperman argues that intervention and the possibility of intervention by countries with a selfless desire to help lesser developed groups in danger can cause more trouble than its’ worth (Kuperman 93). In making this comment, Kuperman argues that the outcome of intervention is not always set in stone. He probably considers that there may be outcomes that fan fire to the flame and worsen an already dire situation. This could mean that Kuperman believes the immediate reaction may not always be the rational decision. While both arguments are valid, it should be noted that not every person can be saved, as it is impossible to be everywhere at…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are few cases in our world in which a civil war has transformed into a full on genocide. Mainly because it is difficult to garner support for the mass killing of an entire group of people. However, when it does happen it is a major ordeal. The civil war in Rwanda from 1990 to 1994 is one example. The Cambodian civil war from 1970-1975 also demonstrates a civil war turned genocide. These two examples share both similarities and differences in the way in which the whole incident panned out. These two examples are also useful in determining contributing factors to the outbreak of genocide. As there are not many instances of civil wars turning into genocides, the cases in Rwanda and Cambodia can help us to understand the variables enable…

    • 1220 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Michael Walzer makes a compelling argument in his article on global crisis, “the Argument about Humanitarian Intervention”. Walzer argues that humans have always been fighting each other and causing global problems. He claims that with today’s technology it has never been simpler to kill large numbers of people, if one has the resources of course. Walzer poses the question that in the event of a humanitarian crisis, such as cases of severe war crimes or ethnic cleansing, to what degree should the rest of the world respond?…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While the American people can generally agree that mass killings are a horrible thing, there are a few other aspects about the citizens that present an interesting issue. One of the biggest issues is the term genocide itself. The word is one which carries a lot of weight behind it and is somewhat scary to people. This is shown in a study in which people were asked if the United States should intervene in a situation in which genocide has occurred. An impressive 65 percent said “always”, while 23 percent said “only when American interests are involved”, and only 6 percent said “never”. The study went on to ask if they would favor some intervention in the Bosnian and Rwandan genocides, a whopping 80 percent said they would be in favor of intervention…

    • 1532 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are some critical about the humanitarian intervention. Humanitarian intervention face some critical, the humanitarian intervention is supported by a number of moral, philosophical and practical rationales, so too is the orthodox contention that humanitarian intervention is unlawful. Those who oppose the notion of humanitarian intervention frequently contend that humanitarian intervention is an asymmetrical right that allows powerful countries to maintain their powers and infringe upon the sovereignty of the weak. It allows the powerful to grasp more power and a greater ability to abuse that power. Given that all states commit human rights violations to some extent, sanctioning humanitarian intervention could give powerful nations a permanent…

    • 162 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Since 2011, a day in Syria will never be the same; colored with death and destruction. Inspired by the grave humanitarian crisis this thesis will examine the occurrence of humanitarian intervention from the perspective of neorealism. As such, on rational choice bases; power-relations, national interests, geostrategic considerations, and domestic support will heavily influence the discussion. This research will explain how the international law and norms clashed with basic state survival concept in light of humanitarian intervention concept where the author found that neorealism view is still by and large govern the interactions within international relations. It can be seen when there is a conflict between idea of humanitarian norms and national…

    • 194 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    History has shown that liberalists have failed at morally intervening in times of humanitarian crisis. In the case of Kosovo Marxist and Social Constructivist argue that the multilateral intervention was unsuccessful. The question is why humanitarian intervention in Kosovo and not Cambodia or Libya and not Iraq? What made Kosovo the exception? Humanitarian intervention is carried out by an multilateral force under international organizations like the UN (Kouchner, 4). The Kosovo precedent is key in understanding the intent of intervention and its flaws today. The intervention proved that the global community does not tolerate the killing of an entire people. It is undeniable that intervention was necessary in Kosovo. However, the style of…

    • 1692 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are central increasing tensions between international Law and the United Nations, as the UN revolves around a dual responsibility, to uphold human rights of the persons and to uphold the sovereign rights of the state. It has caused issues surrounding humanitarian intervention, which creates a question, to whether the UN security council, including; the U.K, USA, France, Russia and China, should be the final decider to whether one state can use force on another state. By definition, humanitarian intervention overrides the responsibility to promote and defend sovereignty. So the regime in the state is no longer sovereign, once that state has begun mass human rights…

    • 688 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Humanitarian intervention in the 1990s established that international issues could not be dealt with on an inconsistent, ad hoc basis, resulting in the making of the doctrine Responsibility to Protect (R2P). R2P was introduced by the International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty in 2001, and endorsed by United Nations (UN) member states during the 2005 World Summit. The doctrine affirmed the collective responsibility to protect when “national authorities are manifestly failing to protect their populations from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing and crimes against humanity”. Yet R2P has failed to consistently act and protect citizens, as the cases of Darfur, Libya and Syria will prove. These inconsistencies weaken the…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Every state is motivated by self-interest when it comes to international affairs. Ethical reasoning can come into play when states try to intervene when infractions against human rights occur. The protection of human rights is a basic law a majority of states enforce. However, when a violation of these basic rights is tested the way in which states react is key to understanding the complexity of humanitarian intervention. Humanitarian intervention considers many arguments, the main being responsibility versus sovereignty and the destabilization of a preexisting, tyrannical regime. Although both arguments are valid for discussion, many people fail to see this because of self-interest. This…

    • 1311 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Military Intervention

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The military intervention should not initially be made if it clearly can lead to conflict escalation or to greater human suffering than in the case of non-interference. This should be done everything possible to ensure compliance with the intervention of the international humanitarian law. However, the goals of intervention are not only to end the violence and restore order (Annan, 2003). A military success is not final, but only the initial stage of intervention. The main goal of military intervention, no matter which factor was a motivator the countries engaged in it, must be a halt loss of lives and the protection of human rights. The humanitarian considerations should be the primary motive for the use of force. And after the resolution, the invaders have to overcome social chaos, to change the environment and living conditions, reproducing in the country…

    • 932 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays