The Ethics Of The Milgram Experiment Essay examples

734 Words 3 Pages
Diana Baumrind often disagreed with the ethics of the Milgram Experiment; however, Ian Parker took on a different perspective than she. Diana Baumrind, author of, Review of Stanley Milgram 's Experiments on Obedience, claims in his experiments the ethics he possessed were immoral and wrong. Throughout her article she continually disagreed with everything Milgram had "achieved", starting from the first experiments results which appeared as a review in American Psychologist in 1963 (Baumrind 89). While Diana disputed what she thought was the atrocious ethics of Milgram 's experiments, she furthermore believed Milgram should have debriefed the subjects more than what he had done (95). Although Baumrind opinionated her thoughts on these issues, Parker, however, thought otherwise. In his article Obedience, Parker implied Milgram 's experiments would either make Milgram or break him. Naturally, Ian Parker indicated the weaker claims of the experiment; however, he clearly identifies the strength and expertise of his experiments as well. While Baumrind disagreed with Milgram 's work, Parker credits Milgram for his hard work and his works recognized by several other psychologists (95). While Baumrind uniquely proclaimed broad statements, Ian Parker effectively signified Milgram 's key research ethics.
Diana Baumrind vilified Milgram and mentioned that Milgram had trapped his subjects and imaginably harmed not only the self-image; but also, their ability to listen to authority in…

Related Documents