Price Inflation In Healthcare

Great Essays
On the federal side of the situation, we can observe how the price inflation affects the federal healthcare system and the responses of the presidential candidates in their presidential campaign. Currently, many Americans are able to enroll in a healthcare plan because of the Affordable Care Act. The Affordable Care Act “have improved access, affordability, and quality in healthcare for Americans” (hhs.gov). However, the price inflations of the pharmaceutical drugs have created an adverse effect on affordable healthcare, and the presidential candidates are outraged on this effect.
Due to the dramatic price inflation of Daraprim, many people are outraged at the new price. Patients are outraged because of the large amount of money they pay out
…show more content…
If these patients were not on their medications, then they may be admitted to the hospital more frequently. The price inflation is beneficial since “[i]ncreased spending on drugs that specifically manage disease, preclude or delay surgeries, or reduce hospital admissions and lengths-of-stay pay for themselves many times over” (Kleinke 46). Less money would be spent on purchasing the price inflated drugs than spending weeks cooped up in a hospital. Not only would it save money in the long run for the patients who take the medication, but it will also help Medicare to save money as well. Most expenses are picked up by Medicare. Days spent in the hospital will be more expensive than taking medications. However, though this might be true in some cases, the cost of hospitals would not be a problem if the price inflation was so great. If the price inflation was lower, than many more patients would be able to afford their medication. More health complications could be avoided, thus less days will spent in the hospital. If the price increase were not so great, then the problem hospital costs could be …show more content…
Though these plans will help protect the patients and current healthcare plans, these plans are only proposed. These plans will not be in effect if these candidates are not elected into office. Until the presidential election, there is no guarantee for these plans to be in effect. Whether party wins, they both share mutual morals for the desire to help curb the problem of the price inflations. However, until then, I believe that the current government should consider the plans proposed by Sanders and Clinton to help protect not only the patients but the federal healthcare as well. The government should be involved in promoting competition and allowing healthcare providers to negotiate for prescription medication. This will help save costs for both patients and Medicare. There will be less out of pocket expenses for the patients to pay and less costs for Medicare to cover if the prices of the medications is lowered. Medicare would not use as much tax dollars to pay for the medications. If these plans are put into action, then the price gouging from the pharmaceutical companies will

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    It is also useful for clinical research, financial management, identifying the epidemiological pattern and disease trends. - Casemix system using the DRGs increase the number of admissions and decrease the average length of stay. • Disadvantages - This system focused on profitable patients who provided less care, admit more patients and shortens the length of stay despite the quality of care provided to each patient episode.  Fixed per diem based funding Some of the private hospitals still uses the fixed per diem based funding model. This funding model works on the basis of funding a fixed amount is paid by the person’s per day of hospital stay and the health services delivered by the hospital.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Vulnerable Populations

    • 2433 Words
    • 10 Pages

    The cutting of eligibility would save money for the government. It may allow others that are still eligible to receive even better coverage from Medicaid. This will also create a decline in health to people that will get cut. They won’t be able to be seen by doctors and their health will decline. In emergencies, their bills will rise or the tax payers will end up responsible for paying for higher medical taxes.…

    • 2433 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In order to accommodate the amount of money it takes for a free health care system. When the term “free” is used for health care it’s not necessarily free because the money has to come from somewhere. Construction of hospitals and equipment aren’t free so what better way for the government to pay for that than to raise taxes? With taxes going up other things may become affected such as defense, education, technology. Later on money in general will become an issues, as healthy people will then have to pay for people who smoke or have diabetes or other medical issues.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Secure In-Time Health Care

    • 1258 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In addition, the higher deductible will make policy holders more unwilling to access health care. The policyholder may have enjoyed better health condition if early access to health care is possible. But due to the limitation of health insurance, the common sense “a doctor will be ready for you when you visit” no longer holds. The need of a piece of aspirin may finally be finally turned the necessity of surgery. In financial world, one dollar earned tomorrow is not as worthy as one dollar earned today because of the interest.…

    • 1258 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It may be difficult to implement at first and very expensive, but ultimately the costs are lowered. Because of the high costs of Adverse Drug Events a year and the effect they have on the length of stay, to reduce these events would be to reduce the cost of patient care. This tends to help hospitals financially. This is due to the fixed costs of Medicare. With the length of stay being shorter, this cuts down on cost for the hospitals.…

    • 1405 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since one of the main goals of the law is to control health care costs, doctors will have more incentive to undertreat patients rather than undertreat like before. ObamaCare replaces the fee for service model with bundled payments, so hospitals and physicians would receive a fixed payment for treating a patient’s condition, no matter what it was and regardless of what it costs the providers. If the doctors treat the patients for less than the bundle given, they get to keep the leftover. If the reverse happens and their costs of treating the patient are higher than the bundled payment, they have to pay for the loss. Bundled payments were supposed to get rid of incentives to over treat the patients, but they created dangerous incentives to undertreat.…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, government subsidy may not lead to lower cost of medical treatment, because the hospital can use the money to either improve the equipment or purchase more expensive medicine which can only reduce the period of medical treatment. Those new methods can always cost more money such as maintaining the equipment. Second, when the hospital gets a fixed annual subsidy, the doctors may not have the motivation to work harder which means they might have lower working efficiency. Overall, this solution will not possibly solve the disharmonious relationship between doctors and…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If it is universalized which means free for everyone, poor people might enjoy that. But when healthcare is required for every citizen at a lower price or free, working people must pay for unemployed ones. To finance the universal healthcare, taxes will increase by a fair amount as in countries as the U.K where taxes on income are relatively high compared to the U.S. Increasing taxes can contribute to make even poorer the poor middle class citizens. Universal healthcare is good but taxes will replace a fair amount of the cost of healthcare. Which is unfair a portion of the population.…

    • 781 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Insurance could also play a part in the introduction of this method because they could pay up to the reference price, if the companies priced the drug higher, then the patient could pay the rest. Under the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FFDCA) the government works directly with manufacturing companies to collect money for development and ensures that the drug is safe for use, but because the United States market is not regulated they do not set a price point for the drug during this process. The US market already has a system that is similar to price referencing with Medicare and Medicaid, but that does not help every consumer, just those with that support. The solution in this case would be to open similar regulations that Medicare and…

    • 1519 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Without another company competing, that specific drug has more value to the consumer because it 's a necessity and they will be paying for the expensive drug. Other than competition, the articles state about having more bargaining power with the pharmaceutical companies. The United States health care system, allows insurers like Medicare to bargain to set enrollees’ drug prices could serve as something of a stand-in (Taylor, 2015). A way to pay for low-cost drugs, insurers can negotiate with the pharmaceutical on getting discounts where they can bring down the prices or they can even question the value of their drugs and compare to similar drugs. But in order to have more bargaining power, there need to be more drugs available to treat the particular conditions (Taylor, 2015).…

    • 1525 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays