Comparing Milgram's Some Conditions Of Obedience And Disobedience

Superior Essays
Stanley Milgram had a goal to make a lasting impact in the field of psychology. So, he devised an experiment to understand why Nazi’s in the Holocaust followed Hitler. It is an understandable ambition because we must understand why Nazis followed and performed such horrific acts to be able to insure that it never happens again. Milgram’s experiment took place on February 1st, 1965 in an experiment titled Some Conditions of Obedience and Disobedience to Authority. His experiment is justified because of its fundamental steps in understanding obedience that will assist in understanding ow terrible forces in the world gain power and followers. Although this experiment caused emotional harm, failed to test military obedience, and failed to include a charismatic leader it was critical to begin to understand obedience to authority.
Milgram’s experiment included a “learner” who was an actor, a “teacher” who was the actual subject of the experiment, and an “authority” who was the experimenter (Milgram 56). There was a variety of male teachers
…show more content…
Heuristics is a process of learning by using past knowledge and watching other people found in Merriam-Webster Dictionary. This means that if someone is standing in a line they may not know why they are standing in the line. They are just doing what everyone else is doing; a kind of group mentality. This psychological phenomenon helps explain why the teachers shocked the learners because instead of having to decide for yourself what to do someone is telling you. The teacher has the experimenter to tell them what to do. This coupled with the human disposition to work with a group leaves no doubt that heuristics are in place to convince people to do things. By understanding that people stand in line for no reason allowed me to believe that Milgram’s study has feasible

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s Obedience Study Milgram’s original motive for executing this ethics breaking experiment was to learn why the German people allowed the murder of millions of Jewish people during the Holocaust. Stanley Milgram wanted to learn as to how people can listen to authority and break their personal morals to follow someone that they believe to be control. During the Holocaust, Nazis led a massacre of millions of Jewish people without letting personal values, such as compassion, stop them from committing this crime. In a general perspective, Milgram wanted to understand the effect of authority and how far people would go to obey authority under extremely conflicting circumstances. If I were placed in this experiment under the teacher position,…

    • 333 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The goal of this paper is to review and analyze the article written by Stanley Milgram in 1963. This experiment was considered to be one of the most acknowledged research in the history of social psychology that revealed the unpredicted side of human nature. The author described the tendencies of obedience as inevitable part of our lives, particularly since we live in the complex systems of society where human interaction is unavoidable. He illustrated that this specific tendencies of human behavior was extremely relevant at this specific time in history, during which millions of innocent lives had systematically been lost through wars and fascist movements. It is clearly evident that the author became deeply curious about the nature of “obedience”…

    • 257 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Liberals are from Mars and conservative from Venus. The main theme of Predisposed: Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences is to present the reader with how neither is better than the other, but different. The book focuses on the analysis on how biology determines our political views and inclinations. John R. Hibbings, Kevin B. Smith and Jon R. Alford are the authors of Predisposed. As biopoliticians, they provide evidence of people’s view and how it differs based on biology.…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dalrymple logically states, “Milgram proved that it was obedience to authority that led people to behave in this fashion, rather than, say, the unleashing of a latent sadistic urge to inflict pain on people.” He accurately describes this quote in his article because the subjects upset the learner by following the study behind obedience (Dalrymple 120). Yvonne Williams, a social psychologist studying the Holocaust, positions that obedience to authority is not an aspect that could be fixed, but it rather depends on the cultures a person might be raised with (Williams). While Dalrymple effectively refers to this, Baumrind dissimilarity argues that the German Officers viewed the Jewish people “as subhuman and not worthy of consideration” because they did not believe they were in the wrong. Baumrind logically states that Milgram is concerned with the social consequences of destructive obedience, because he demonstrates the problem about how the German Officers during the Holocaust were forced to obey, or else they were to be killed (Baumrind 93).…

    • 902 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dalrymple begins analyzing Stanley Milgram’s experiment and begins to justify what happened in the experiment. The article described that Milgram’s demonstration was individuals that shocked subjects and tormented them simply because they needed to obey to power. Dalrymple expresses that despite the fact that Milgram proved even good people have the capability to…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment, in conclusion, revealed most people cannot resist authority because the Nazi-regime utilized indoctrination, legislations, and the German society to acquire participation from all facets of German society. The Holocaust…

    • 1105 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    An evaluation of the Milgram experiment provides an adequate, psychological explanation for the Holocaust, but does not justify the horrific crimes. Inspired by the horrors of the Holocaust, Milgram conducted an experiment to determine whether or not ordinary people would obey a stranger, even if it meant harming someone else (De Vos 223). The methodology of the experiment was very simple. Participants were told that they were aiding an experiment on learning theories and the role of punishment on memory (Cherry). Then, the participant and a confederate were chosen for the roles of “teacher” and “learner” in a rigged drawing so that the participant would always be the teacher (De Vos 229).…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Two psychological experimenters attempted to uncover the most brutal area of the human brain in their articles: Milgram 's "The Perils of Obedience" and Zimbardo 's "The Stanford Prison Experiment". The first and earliest of these experimenters was Stanley Milgram, who conducted his experiments at Yale University. He starts the article with information on testing whether or not a person would administer painful—and eventually lethal—shocks to other people when given the order by an authoritative person in the room with the ‘teacher’. His results were indeed surprising: twenty-five people out of forty administered lethal shocks when instructed. He includes excerpts from the experiment to add to his argument.…

    • 1011 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    He points out that Milgram’s results were not published or well-known until he established the connection between the Holocaust and his experiment. It is evident that Parker believes Milgram does this simply to gain popularity for his…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Unfortunately, however, Milgram’s experiment is heavily criticized by some, who discredit its findings entirely--to no avail. The lessons behind Milgram’s experiment cannot be shaken. Obviously the experiment is drastically different from a genocide like the Holocaust. German soldiers led lines of naked Jews to their deaths in gas chambers at grimy concentration camps across Europe while Milgram’s subjects were merely asked to flip a switch and shock a man on the other side of the wall. German soldiers watched their victims die while Milgrim’s subjects were assured by the experimenter that the shocks “may be painful, but they’re not dangerous” (1).…

    • 1973 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the article "The Perils of Obedience” Stanley Milgram describes obedience as a basic element in the structure of social life and the effects it has on all communal living(Milgram 693). What if one is asked to be obedient to something that doesn’t aline with their personal morals? Milgram wanted to run an experiment to find this out. He simply wanted to know if the Nazis were acting out in pure evil or just simply following direct orders by a person who, they thought, was placed in a position of authority. In order to do this, he sets out to test how a normal person reacts when given violent orders by a person, who they believe are in a place of authority.…

    • 2072 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people have the idea that during WW1 Nazis killed and tortured many Jews freely and even willingly. What Milgram is doing in his experiment is trying to figure out how easily people follow orders, orders that could harm and potentially kill someone. Milgram got participants through a newspaper article, and paying them $450 to complete the experiment (random sampling). The experiment was carried out in a lab at Yale, causing ecological validity to be good, as it 's a very trustworthy institution and subjects are more likely to abide when in a laboratory compared to a real world setting. He was using a deceiving method by tricking the “teacher” to believe that every time he flipped a set of 30 switches, which were ranged from Slight Shock…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments created great controversy. They showed how vulnerable humans were to the will bending power of authority. This idea especially stuck around the time the experiment took place, the early 1960’s. America was still somewhat fresh off of World War II, and Americans were shocked to see that they were just as capable of being pushed to do things that went against their morals as Germans were under Nazi authorities. Milgram was thorough in his studies by including multiple permutations of the original where he tested subjects responses to different forms of authority.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays