The Dissimilarity Between Karma And Rebirth

The philosophy of karma and rebirth explains the most important dissimilarity between Western religious views and the great Indian religious perceptions. Western philosophy also makes use of a retributive description of evil in which a person’s suffering is recorded for by his earlier misconduct. But mentioned the properly wrong correlation between suffering and sin in a person’ lifetime, Western religions have supported other definitions of suffering. Though, Indian views merges this view with the perception of multiple human incarnations, so that all suffering in this life can be defined through each person’ earlier misconduct, whether in this or in an earlier life, and all wrong . Doing in the current life will be penalized in either this …show more content…
So, Charles Keyes explained that different people have been uneasy with defining karma as a theodicy, as this presupposes the view of a benevolent, omnipotent deity that is “uncharacteristic of South Asian belief. Though, it would be a considerable error to insist on an unreasonably narrow formulation of the issue of evil, particularly one that considers an ethical monotheist belief. Actually, no reason is there to limit the issue about monotheist religions, or to theist religions, or even to religions at all. As Susan Neiman explained, “nothing is simple than defining the issue of evil in nontheist contexts; she explained, for instance, Hegel’s insistence that the real is appropriate to the rational . The issue of evil in its question just asks these human questions as “Why do the innocent experience and the wicked flourish?” “Why is not the world better ordered and further just?” And to this wider existential issue of evil, karma apparently does function as a purported solution. Karma is a “theory of causation that presents reasons for human luck, good or bad, and that can in theory give supporting descriptions for human bad luck”