The Desirability Of Individuality In J. S. Mill's On Liberty

Great Essays
In Chapter 3 of J.S Mill’s “On Liberty” an exceptionally significant philosophical concept is addressed, namely that of individuality and how it affects development, not only of the self but of society as well. Mills addresses multiple factors that benefit and obstruct the development of individuality as well as the role individuality plays in creating a healthy society and personal life. In conclusion Mills claims that freedom is an absolute necessity for development of the self. All of which will be proven or debated within this writing. First off, Mills idea or definition of individuality is similar but not identical to the commonly accepted definition of the word in our current time period, rather his definition of individuality focuses …show more content…
Involving ideas like individuality benefits society as a whole through peer to peer learning, develops your own personal being or character and when created with freedom it spawns knowledge or in some cases genius. Mills provides a variety of ideas to prove each of these points, many of which are still valid in our society today. First of all if everyone lives their lives differently (in a positive manner of course) there is so much to be learned through peer-to-peer learning about different ways of life. Concepts or tendencies that you observe within other people’s living experience you can adapt within your own lifestyle, leading to a much more richer and fulfilling life. Mill explains this by stating that humans are fallible, thus by witnessing different experiments of living we gain the value of techniques to create a happier existence. By this point it is obvious that Mill believes that individual expression is absolutely indispensible for individual and social …show more content…
He explains this argument by stating that genius comes from those free of conformity, additionally it is explained that those conformists or un original people that try to make you conform are quick to reject originality, also causing them to shun genius for mediocrity. In other words Mill believe that the pressure put on you by society or stifling social norms was and is capable of oppressing genius produced by new creative ways of thinking. Mills belief that genius can only be created or developed in a place free of social pressures or forced conformity is showcased in a quote of his on page 72 which reads “ Genius can only breathe freely in an atmosphere of freedom” (Mills, 72). The truth behind this quote lies in the fact that people of genius status for the most part, are un-ordinary and in past occurrences have been discriminated against for being this way. The point Mill is trying to get across is if we force people to conform under the belief that the way of the majority is best for everyone, then really we are losing access to progress as a society by the rejection of genius. Conversely if we reject genius or force people who could have potentially changed the world to be exactly like the majority of average people, we are in turn halting the progress of society and humanity as a whole. Mill addresses this point when he talks about how we need

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The world is a vast place, filled with numerous individuals, all characterized by unique qualities. John Stuart Mill, a 19th century writer, philosopher, and businessman who placed great importance on those who find and offer new ideas, theorized that the two primary qualities in life were originality and genius. An original person is one who is independent of all others and is unique in all that they do, and someone who displays genius is unusually intelligent and creative. In “Genius and Originality”, Mill suggests that these qualities are indispensable in society since they prevent life and knowledge from becoming static, and without them, society cannot progress. He proposes that conformity is preventing genius and originality from flourishing, while freedom allows them to thrive.…

    • 1197 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individualism is a highly controversial topic, as its outlook varies tremendously on a global scale. According to a ClearlyCultural survey, an overwhelming ninety one percent of American favor individualism rather than collectivism. In essence, an individual is more important than the group not only because he stimulates talent and creativity but also because he innovates the world and maintains diversity. Likewise, a sensational figure of individualistic prowess would be the most popular advocate of racial equity himself,…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “I am myself; you are yourself; we are two distinct persons, equal persons…provided with faculties necessary to our individual existence...” This quote -- taken from a letter written by former ex-slave Fredrick Douglas to ex- “master” Thomas Auld -- explains the overall meaning of Individuality. It is the possession of characteristics that help to set an individual apart from others and thereby make him unique. In Ayn Rand’s novel Anthem, Rand expresses the importance of individuality by showing its effect on the main character’s happiness, ability to acquire new ideas and the society’s ability to acquire new ideas. The evident lack of individuality seen in this book is also present in the novel Uglies by Scott Westerfled.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Each human being has been taught the art of individualism. Civilization after civilization has manipulated the life of its members through selling the idea of independence and self-sufficiency. Creating social taboos and setting labels that serve as the stigma of the community, are some of the techniques use to oppress individuals as components of the greater scheme that is society. The belief of individualism, the big banner that says it is fine to be different, has become the current most followed idea of the free world. The question is whether or not such individualism exists or if it is nothing more than a created fantasy used to shape the existence of a race?…

    • 1853 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The second argument that Mill states should be considered is the infallibility argument. In this mill claims that if an individual suppresses a view on a subject they consider themselves to be infallible. Mill argues that humans are fallible creatures by nature and shows that history has a plethora of examples where this argument should have been considered. One of the most prominent examples is the once widely held belief that the sun revolved around the earth. When original counter arguments were brought to the public, they were quickly shot down and suppressed, and it wasn't until sufficient evidence was presented did people consider that they were wrong.…

    • 1836 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The amount of eccentricity, or in other words, diversity, in a society has been directly proportional to the amount of moral courage, mental vigor, and genius present (Mill 64). Within a society, “Individuals, classes, nations have been extremely unlike one another; they have struck out a great variety of paths, each leading to something valuable” (Mill 69). With diversity, humans have been able to make many valuable discoveries, whether this be through success or failure.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuality is a very general idea about a certain lifestyle. While it can be perceived in many different ways, both Ralph Waldo Emerson and Washington Irving accurately describe it through different viewpoints in their works, titled “Self Reliance,” and “Rip Van Winkle,” respectively. This concept applies to all human lives, as everyone has internal debates on whether they are on the side of blending into society, and therefore not contributing to it, or pulling themselves out of society too much. While many people try to find different compromises between being an individual and being part of society, both of these works demonstrate the values and importance of both pulling yourself out of organized society and including yourself in groups…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill, to an extent, agrees with Hayek. This is an example of the philosophers agreeing, but for different reasons. Mill believes there should be something similar to a private sphere for the individual. Private sphere, meaning an aspect of an individual’s life outside of government control. A person should be able to do what he wants without interference if it does not hurt or negatively affect another in a substantial way.…

    • 2226 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Argument of Utilitarianism In “Utilitarianism” John Stuart Mill presents the case of Utilitarianism as a moral theory. Moral theories are structured as a set of statements used to predict a set of factors or concept. Moral theories are thought to be universal and tell which action is the right one in any given situation. Utilitarianism is one the most influential and best known moral theories, often called “The Greatest Happiness Principles”.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In other words, if an individual rejects or contradicts the ideas expressed by the community, the community should be able to force that individual to submit to their opinions. It is at this point in which Rousseau and Mill differ. This act of forcing conformity would be seen as a form of tyranny to Mill who values the freedom of the individual. In order for society to progress, individual freedoms must always be expressed foremost. Indeed, Mill agrees that man should not behave in ways that would harm others but they should still be free to do as they wish.…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Everyone is different, from looks, attitude, athleticism, and so much more. Each human has their own ups and downs, and each person works to improve themselves. In Kurt Vonnegut’s Harrison Bergeron, individuality is seen as harmful, something that encourages jealousy and low self-worth in others. However, individuality is needed to move society forward: through personal achievements and talent society will improve as a whole.…

    • 1983 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill’s work goes into depth on how much liberty should be granted to the individual and to what extent the government should be able to intervene with these liberties for the betterment of society. I agree with Mill on what the basic tenets for his argument on freedom of speech are (i.e. truth, utility, social progress). I also accept that the justification of freedom of speech as that which can bring about such things as truth and social progress. He provides a clear explanation for society as to why it is important to allow others to state their opinions and not infringe upon the free speech of others. It seems clear that acting in accordance to this precept will lead to the overall betterment of society.…

    • 2454 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Thomas Jefferson’s “Declaration of Independence” he explains freedom by writing “and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do” leading to the simple answer of; freedom is having the power to do as one pleases (344). In “Nature,” “Self-Reliance,” and “Walden,” Ralph Waldo Emerson and David Thoreau both utilize their writings to demonstrate similar themes about freedom that Jefferson explained. Emerson is an advocate for freedom for all people regardless of gender, age, social status, etc. Through “Nature” and “Self-Reliance” readers understand freedom can be reached through nature,…

    • 1062 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill Vs Rousseau Analysis

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages

    John Stuart Mill the liberal and Jean-Jacques Rousseau the republican, are two political philosophers whom focussed on the integration of political liberty with the relationship found between that of the individual, society and the state by the means of power or authority. Both of these political thinkers formed their arguments in their writings, namely; On Liberty (1859) by Mill, and The Social Contract (1913) by Rousseau. On a more specific scale, their views differed in much contrast, whereby Rousseau claims that people and individuals of society may only acquire the entity of freedom through a transitioning process from the natural state to the civil state, whereby they would have to conform to the general will as the common good. On the…

    • 1418 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Summum bonum is the highest form of good according to the values and priorities in an ethical system. For John Stuart Mill, the summum bonum is happiness. Mill is lead to this belief by regarding happiness as the ultimate aim of humanity – to live a life as free from pain and as rich in enjoyment as possible. This is the ideology of utilitarianism, or Mill’s moral theory that judges the ethicality of an action following its utility. Mill’s argument of chapter 2 of Utilitarianism is defining the greatest happiness principle and addressing misconceptions and criticisms opponents have.…

    • 1076 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays