John Stuart Mill On Happiness Analysis

Improved Essays
The concept of Happiness is a concept that shows how individuals should live in general. Individuals usually attempt to do whatever it is necessary to obtain what it takes to be happy. The ultimate goal of an individual is to be happy regardless of which actions are needed in order to achieve this goal. John Stuart Mill supports the idea of making any decision as long as it makes an individual achieve happiness, and in that case it is considered to be morally correct. In his work “Utilitarianism”, Mill defends the idea of utilitarianism. Mill properly encourages people to pursue happiness, and claims that happiness is the most important goal to accomplish. Utilitarianism, as an ethical theory based on consequences and happiness, is a justified …show more content…
The reason why utility is not prolonged happiness is because when somebody is continuously happy, that person loses interest in taking any further actions that will benefit in others in order to be generally happy. Pleasure should not always last for a long time because it is something that should vary with time, in order to feel what happiness is because there is always pain in certain times, but we always try to choose what will outweigh pain and cause us happiness. Mill also stresses that, “The utilitarian morality does recognize in human beings the power of sacrificing their own greatest good for the good of others” (371), which shows how at one point in time, an individual has to sacrifice its own happiness in order to promote happiness to others. This idea connects to Mill’s previous claim about continuous happiness because it shows how being happy for a long time is impossible because somehow we need to consider to what extent we should be happy, and share that happiness with those who might need it the most by not being …show more content…
I believe that people should endorse utilitarianism because in order for us to live in a world free of injustices and peaceful, we need to promote happiness and stop judging society, if no actions are being taken in order to live a happier life. In general, act-utilitarianism emphasizes the precise context, and the different characteristics of a given situation that represents a moral problem, and it shows a specific technique in order to deal with the case. Additionally, rule-utilitarianism elaborates on the regular characteristics of human beings and how issues occur based on their needs and problems. Furthermore, Mill would agree, and say that we need rules that will deal with actions which are not morally correct such as: stealing, killing, lying, cheating, etc., in order for us to achieve what is desired by all humans, happiness. However, both act- and rule-utilitarianism can be said to agree with that what determines if an action is morally right or wrong is the connection that there is between what we do, and its consequences in relation to the general happiness of the greatest number of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Mill’s theories that explain morality, argues that the usefulness of the moral worth of an action determined by the utility. on the principle of Utilitarianism strongly believes in happiness and pleasure derived from the consequence of one action, the…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Philosopher Gilbert Harmon describes Utilitarianism as such, “ You ought always to act so as to maximize the social utility where social utility is simply another name for the general welfare,” (Harmon, pg. 152). What this means is that the right action is the one that maximizes the good (happiness) for society as a whole. From looking at this we can tell that a Utilitarian would most likely have no…

    • 933 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act utilitarianism is critiqued by many more than rule utilitarianism because people who believe in act utilitarianism due not conform to a society’s rules and they proceed with their actions with disregard with breaking any laws. I think that if more people believed in rule utilitarian it would not be as an extreme theory because people would have a general value of justice to look at while making their decisions to maximize happiness. Rule utilitarianism restricts certain actions that would end of up being morally immoral and therefore would help out the critiques of…

    • 1281 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Case of Happiness It is no secret that we want to live a happy life. Utilitarianism is simple; it is based on the idea that our actions are morally wrong or right depending on the outcomes of those actions (Gilmore, Travis). Morally right actions increase happiness. Morally wrong actions decrease happiness. In this paper, I will show that the basic concept of Utilitarianism is a true justified ethical theory.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although all of our souls are not the same, Aristotle states that personal happiness is the goal of ethics that all human beings strive towards. He claims this due to the way we behave being directly related to virtue and vice. Happiness lies in the middle grounds of excess of virtue and excess of vice. By pinpointing this middle ground, the best action can be determined. Happiness is then a common ground for how to live a good life.…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What do you think of Haybron’s view? Are you convinced? Why are why not? What are the outstanding problems or questions about it for you? I am convinced that Haybron’s view of happiness is a perfect account of happiness in regards to practical utility.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Chuang Tzu states in Basic Writings that those who live their lives according to The Way is how a person can live to their fullest potential. While there are similarities between the philosopher’s views, they each have main factors in their ideas that set them apart from each other. “Eudaimonia” is the term that Aristotle uses to describe happiness, living life as fully as possible and fulfilled. He also says happiness is the highest good, and the means to reaching this state are to be virtuous (Pol. 7.8).…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of Aristotle’s ethic is to find the highest and good in life which he believes to be happiness. In Aristotle’s terms, all our actions or goals is used for to reach our ultimate goal which will be happiness in itself. This happiness isn’t simply temporary moments of desires, but it is defined by Aristotle as one’s worth living by quality of life. To achieve one’s happiness is to obtain excellence or virtue because it will provide a life guided by reason. As rational beings, we need both intellectual and moral virtues through the practices of our lives’ experiences.…

    • 710 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Lennon believes that the greatest happiness requires challenging the constraints, such as social norms and organizations. Through this explanation, Mill’s idea of utilitarianism is observed. Eliminating worries of the world, one will obtain…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill argues that the sole basis of morality in a society in happiness and that everyone desires to be happy. He explains that every other object is a means to happiness or an item of happiness. He explains that justice and human rights exist in a society because they are necessary for people’s happiness. This theory has however being criticized in for many reasons.…

    • 820 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics