Camp David Accords Case Study

Improved Essays
Show More
The organization of Maoz-Israel cited in 2002 that: "There are currently about 30 terrorist attacks per day in this tiny country of 5.2 million Jews. What if there were 30 terrorist attacks per day in Chicago or Los Angeles or Paris or London?" (“War” n. pag.). The Camp David Accords since the 1978 signing did not help in the Middle East, as stated in a study of Israeli terrorist attacks in 2002. U.S. President, Jimmy Carter, wished to help with Middle Eastern peace but everything he tried did not help. To help with the Middle East crisis, he started by learning about the background of the conflicts in the Middle East. Once he knew a significant amount about the Israeli Palestinian Conflict, he decided to hold a summit in Camp David, Maryland …show more content…
On August 5th, 1978, Carter invited Anwar Sadat and Menachem Begin to Camp David to begin the peace negotiation process. Both agreed to arrive at Camp David because they had these words in their head, “The people of the Middle East yearn for peace so that the vast human and natural resources of the region can be turned to the pursuits of peace and so that this area can become a model for coexistence and cooperation among nations” (“Carter” n. pag.). The people living in the Middle East know that it is important to have peace between surrounding countries not only because it is beneficial to everyone, but they want to be examples for religions able to coexistence. Because a few Middle Eastern countries want peace, specifically Egypt and Israel, they accepted Carter’s invitation and arrived at Camp David on September 5th, 1978. The summit lasted a total of 13 days after September 5th, 1978. Carter thought that peace in the Middle East was not just important for the U.S., but for the world because the Middle East had oil that everyone could use. Since Carter did not want the whole world to know about what was happening in the Middle East, he chose to not have the media involved. The media broadcasted about the peace summit, but they were never given the day-by-day status. By doing this, Carter eliminated the chance of the media …show more content…
The Agreement was split into two separate documents and one concerned Arab-Israeli issues and the other concerned Egyptian-Israeli issues. The first document was called, “Framework for Peace in the Middle East Agreed at Camp David.” This document concerned the future of the Gaza Strip, the West Bank, the Palestinian refugee issue, and a five year transitional period. The five year transitional period had to do with how Israel would withdraw from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip. The idea was for the Israeli Military to slowly leave the area allowing the Palestinians to take over and have an elected government, but Israel was able to stay in a few areas for their safety. The second document of the Camp David Accords was the “Framework for the Conclusion of a Peace Treaty Between Egypt and Israel.” This document dealt with Egyptian-Israeli agreements and how they will create peace. It mentioned what the future was for the Sinai Peninsula, and that it would be returned to Egypt in three to nine months after the Accords were signed, but Israel was going to be allowed to have a few security zones. The other topic the second document mentioned, was the relationship that Israel and Egypt would have. Arguments were later started because the future of the Golan Heights and East Jerusalem, which were both occupied by Israel, were not mentioned in the Accord, and so the Arabs wanted to take both. This caused Begin to act, and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Apush Dbq Research Paper
    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Apush Dbq Research Paper

    He started by moving to bring peace between Israel and Egypt through the Camp David Accords. Though he did not succeed in bringing peace to the Middle East he did succeed in his policy to get Egypt and Israel to sign a treaty. If Carter was not so determined to get the treaty signed by the two countries then the treaty would not have happened. Stadt only came to Camp David to retrieve the Arab territory that Israel had taken. Stadt needed to make sure that the Arabs would get back the Sinai Peninsula and the rest of the territories. However, Stadt knew this would be difficult, because of the close relations between Israel and the United States. In the end Stadt received the Sinai Peninsula, but for the rest of the territory the Arabs would have to deal with Israel and Jordan to see who would gain control of the areas. This however, left Stadt in a fire storm with the Palestinians. For Carter the issues with the Israel and Palestine would be a whole another problem in itself. He realized that when it came to making peace the policy would first have to get both sides to recognize each other. This did not stop Begin to fully stop his settlement construction in Jerusalem. Even though Begin, promised to stop the construction while peace is determined during negotiations (Glad and Johnston 2013). After the peace treaty and Palestine not getting its territory back from Israel. It leads to tensions rising and the two going to war with each other. With the peace treaty over Israel also continued with construction of the settlements pushing more Palestinians out of their homes (Yaqub,…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Balfour Declaration Dbq
    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Balfour Declaration Dbq

    One turning point in the movement to support the creation of Israel was the Balfour declaration issued by the British government in 1917. This becomes both a powerful document, as a very strong endorsement of a Jewish national home in Palestine, but it is also a controversial one. It is argued by many that the provision for protecting the rights of non-Jewish Palestinians has been disregarded since the creation of the modern state of Israel. The encouragement given by the Balfour Declaration is a major factor in the massive migration of Jews from all parts of the world and eventually paved way for the formation of the State of Israel. One turning point in Israeli-Arab relations was the Camp David Accords, signed by President Jimmy Carter, Egyptian…

    • 228 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Israel Dbq
    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Essay On Israel Dbq

    The United States realized that Israel was defending itself and that it needed help with it. The US continued to help Israel by supplying them with all kinds of goods, such as three billion dollars in foreign aid every year, which is one fifth of the United States’ foreign aid money. (Doc. 2) Even civilians of everyday life in the US realized Israel needed help, because the knew all Israel wanted was peace between the two bickering races. Israel was demanded to give up land in exchange for peace, but received known whatsoever, so US knew they had to step in and help. (Doc. 7) However, the US wasn’t the only country realizing Israel needed help defending itself from violence within the country. Egypt decided to form a peace agreement for the Israelis and the Palestinians, knowing this would help end their rivalry. The President of Egypt at this time claimed new powers over the two groups and mandated it as so. The point of view is from the President of Egypt who knew closely of the struggles in Israel and knew a good temporary way to fix thing was to demand a peace agreement between the two warring states. (Doc.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Jimmy Carter's Analysis
    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Jimmy Carter's Analysis

    Then again, Carter at best had one vibrant minute at a universal accomplishment as President. In September 1978, Carter brought Israeli Prime Minister Menachem Begin and Egyptian President Anwar Sadat together at Camp David, Maryland. After long arrangements, the Camp David Accords, which finished the condition of war among Israel and Egypt, were settled. Sadat and Begin won the Nobel Peace Prize for seeing through the…

    • 2202 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Role Of Jimmy Carter In The 1980s
    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Role Of Jimmy Carter In The 1980s

    First, Jimmy Carter’s administration efforts in the middle east helped form peace between two bitter enemies, Israel and Egypt. This cause of peace between these two sworn enemies was because of the Camp David Accords. The Camp David Accords was signed on September 17, 1978, in the White…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Analysis Of Rashid Khalidi's Sowing Crisis
    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Analysis Of Rashid Khalidi's Sowing Crisis

    Sowing Crisis explains how the Cold war and policies taken by the U.S. have spilled over into today and how it has affected modern U.S. relations with the Middle East. Rashid Khalidi feels that wartime and postwar moves in North Africa and Iran, as well as U.S. air bases in Saudi Arabia, Libya, Morocco, and Turkey, marked the beginning of “an American role as the major Middle Eastern Power, a reality that was masked for a time by the power and proximity to the region of the USSR (Page 9).” Khalidi believes that since the end of the cold war the U.S’s interest in the Middle East has grown greater and greater, like the Gulf war of 1991, and the Oslo accords in 1993. He closes the opening chapter by asking how the U.S. got itself into this situation…

    • 1498 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Influence Of The Reagan Administration During The Contra-Iran Affair
    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Influence Of The Reagan Administration During The Contra-Iran Affair

    Instead of authorizing the sale of weapons to Iran while continuing to support Saddam during the war, the Reagan administration could push the United Nations to play a more active role in stopping the conflict. What Iranians wanted was not continuation of war, but a ceasefire with a clear statement recognizing the aggressor or initiator of war (i.e. Iraq). For 8 years, the UN failed to do so by passing resolutions one after another without condemning Saddam for initiating the war and using chemical weapons against Iranians. Finally, the UN passed resolutions 619 and 620 in 1988; these were the only UN resolutions that condemned Iraq for initiating the war and using chemical weapons against Iranians. Iran accepted the ceasefire when the UN passed resolutions 619 and later 620. This means that the Reagan’s administration could possibly increase a chance of ceasefire between Iran and Iraq before 1988 by ending the sale of weapons to the Iraqis while condemning Iraq for the use of chemical weapons against Iranians. This could also serve as an alternative plan to end the hostage crisis in Lebanon. Reagan’s desire for release of American hostages is understandable; however, what Reagan administration did during the Contra-Iran Affair was not in the best interest of the US because it created a basis for more hostage-takings. Furthermore, selling arms to the both sides of the conflict caused Iranians and Iraqis to suffer from a prolonged war, and significantly increased the number of civilian…

    • 782 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    What Is The Role Of The United States During The Vietnam War
    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages

    What Is The Role Of The United States During The Vietnam War

    Camp David Accords. – It is a treaty of Peace between Israel and Egypt brokered by President Jimmy Carter in 1978 at Camp David. This is very important because it was the first to established peace between these two countries.…

    • 259 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    John Kerry's Goals
    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Kerry's Goals

    John Forbes Kerry impacts the peace process in the Arab-Israeli conflict through putting forth actions to get both sides closer to peace. His main goals are to target and eliminate fighting extremist or intensely opinionated groups. By removing the violence between the Palestinians, the Arab side, and the Israelis, each side can communicate on peace terms. Kerry has made valiant attempts at ending fighting through recognizing the Palestinian demand for a country of their own, ceasefires, and more Middle Eastern countries in the peace process. By ridding of surrounding small problems, Kerry believes he can rid of the large scale issue and lead Palestinians and Israelis toward a large solution.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    Yitzhak Rabin's Assassination Research Paper
    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Yitzhak Rabin's Assassination Research Paper

    Yitzhak Rabin was the prime minister of Israel from 1974 to 1977 and 1992 to 1995 and was assassinated because he was responsible for a peace initiative between Israel and the Palestine Liberation Organization, also known as the Oslo Accords. Rabin was murdered because of a nationalist who believed that withdrawing from any “Jewish” land was heresy and opposed the peace initiative. Rabin’s death came as a shock. The Oslo Accords were supposed to resolve the long conflict of the Israelis and the Palestinians but instead, it led to the death of an important leader. Rabin’s granddaughter spoke at his funeral and expressed her…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More
  • Great Essays

    Reasons For The Failure Of The Oslo Accords
    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Reasons For The Failure Of The Oslo Accords

    I will discuss how the Oslo Peace Process came about, and why it failed. I will talk about the contributing factors that led to its failure, and I will give a personal opinion at the end on the entire peace process and future of the Middle East.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Palestinian And Israeli Conflict Essay
    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Palestinian And Israeli Conflict Essay

    No one truly knows the story behind this conflict so we can’t expect the Israelis and…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Decent Essays

    Israel's Credibility Of The United Nations (PLO)
    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Israel's Credibility Of The United Nations (PLO)

    After that, the United Nations security segment demanded peace talks amongst America and the Soviet Union as strains were ascending over Russia's assurance of ensuring Egypt against Israeli animosity. The oil ban implemented in America by OPEC was a major stressor for that country, so it worked with the Soviet union to require a truce amongst Israeli scenario and the other warring nations. All were welcome to the gatherings. The Soviet Union had not ceased its correspondence with Egyptian authorities, even after the removal of its troops, for it felt that it was a nation that could counter the America's advances in the locale through Israel. Normally, the peace talks accomplished minimal due to contrasted interests between every nation and the US supported peace assentions amongst Israeli context and the Arabian countries without the guide of the United Nations.…

    • 248 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
    Read More
  • Superior Essays

    Camp David Accords Analysis
    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Camp David Accords Analysis

    The signing of the Camp David Accords on 17th of September 1978 is considered one of the political events that have sparked off wide-scale controversy that continues today. The peoples and individuals concerned with the Accords were divided between supporters who described it as a ‘Peace Gate’, and opponents who considered it a ‘Trojan Horse’ . It is not easy to find a party with a middle ground between the supporters who called for ‘settlement and peaceful co-existence’ and the opponents who resisted ‘surrender and forfeit’. These two views were reflected at the level of political discourse in deciding whether to retain the name of the location after which the Accords were named or to arabize it. Those who viewed the Accords as a Trojan Horse…

    • 1268 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
    Read More
  • Improved Essays

    The Causes Of The Arab-Israeli Conflict
    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The Causes Of The Arab-Israeli Conflict

    Since the mid-twentieth century, Jews have been migrating to the land of Israel, known by the Arabs as Palestine, to escape the discrimination and persecution they had been facing in Europe for centuries. The Zionist movement began to grow as a result of the Holocaust, as the Jews believe they have a right to their own Jewish state where their holy sites are. However, the Arabs have been living in Palestine for generations, and they are unwilling to accept the formation of a Jewish state because of the Palestinian cultural and ancestral ties that exist in that land. Because both the Palestinians and Jews are obdurate and will not forswear the land they both feel they have a right to, the Arab-Israeli conflict is an incredibly complicated issue.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
    Read More

Related Topics

Ready To Get Started?
Discover
Company
Follow
©2023 Cram.com
Privacy Policy |  About Ads |  Site Map |  Advertise  | 
  • Cookie Settings