MFT proposes that the moral judgments of individuals are based on their intuition, while AFT explains how a viewer’s sense of morality impacts their enjoyment of mass media narratives. While limiting their definition of morality by only referring to Moral Foundation Theory certainly helped the authors conduct a manageable study, it also represents a limitation. Other theories oppose the idea that morality is intuitive; for instance, Social Expectations Theory proposes that morality, or rules for behavior, are often created and reinforced by portrayals in mass media (DeFleur 225). Social Expectation Theory may have offered a challenging perspective to this study, not only for its basis in research, but for its anecdotal evidence. Narrative portrayals of morality within mass media routinely impact viewers’ thoughts and actions, demonstrating that morality is more flexible and subject to outside influence than it is …show more content…
While this study does have weaknesses, it is equally important to acknowledge its unique strengths. Because the study of the intersection of social media and television is relatively new, it would be unreasonable to expect this study to be free of imperfections. One of study’s strengths is its simple acknowledgement of this growing and fascinating social phenomenon.
Overall, this study represents an important and relatively fresh direction for research. While its scope was limited, Ji and Raney’s work has broader implications. Revealing the morality of the viewers of Downton Abbey through a study like this one could help researchers develop further studies on why we choose to engage with various types of mass media over others. Ji and Raney have helped to foster a discussion and a body of research that could ultimately answer an important question: do we choose media that reinforces our morality, or is our morality influenced by the media we