The Importance Of Divine Law And Devine Law

Decent Essays
Statutory construct is used in order to enhance the understanding of a statue so that a court can apply it to individual cases. In order for there to be a complete understanding, a process has to be consistent from beginning to end. Establishing this is of great importance not only to assist the higher courts, but also to define clear guidance. But, this specific structure can also be manipulated by the Social Contract Theory based on the consensus of a group of individuals. Each individual is bound to a degree of their responsibilities, but their opinions and concerns will ultimately be the end result of an outcome. With that being said, is that the best outcome that could have possibly come out of the decision? On the other hand, would using Devine Law provide a better outcome since it would not be based on man’s own opinion? Devine Law would strictly focus on scientific and moral law that are revealed from God, which deters personal opinions of man. It would also manipulate statutory construct, but not in the same …show more content…
Divine Law, commonly referred to as Natural Law, is the principle that scientific and moral law is fixed, ordained by God, and “discoverable” by man. The terminology of “Divine Law” rather than “Natural Law” is preferred because the latter infers that the fixed, rigid principles of law only include the scientific construct and empirical laws of nature (Ellis, 2004). Divine Law allows man to rely not on their own understanding, but of God’s authority. It does not allow for a group of individuals to come together to make decisions that may constantly change depending on what they think is good for the people. Instead they follow what God has already put in place knowing that it is true and just for all. Statutory Construct and Divine Law can also work together as long as there is not an attempt to control Divine Law in order for it to benefit Statutory

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In essence, God decides morality, the basis of right and wrong. If God says something is right then it is morally right; if God says something is wrong then it also is morally wrong. However, flaws in this theory have caused many people to deny it and believe in Saint Thomas Aquinas Theory of Natural Law. This theory is divided into three parts: the world has values and views built into its nature, describe not only how things are but also how they ought to be, and how do we determine what is tight and wrong. The two theories are opposite in terms of viewpoint but in today's world, but of them are rejected because of conflicting issues.…

    • 521 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “A just law is a man-made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God. An…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In attempting to make the mechanisms by which discrete individual action becomes legal and institutional, and vice versa. A cultural analysis of law, or Ewick and Silbey’s Constitutive theory, suggest that the law is a product of the reciprocal nature of meaning-making: people create meaning as they engage in society. Ewick and Silbey start this inquiry not through a textual analysis of philosophy, statue, or constitutional law, but rather by…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientific Revolution Dbq

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    With the start of the Scientific Revolution, it brought change to the way people lived and viewed the world. Many intellectual thoughts were developed regarding humanity 's position in the universe, this new way of thinking, sophisticated those living in the 1500 to 1700 's. Throughout Europe many individuals began to take these theories as the solid truths, and analyzed their validity. The ideas and beliefs of the common philosopher and intellectual of this period, perhaps the most important was the notion of abandoning faith and finding it in the power of human reason. If humanity could unlock these laws of the universe, the laws that God obliged, why couldn’t philosophers and intellectuals discover the laws of the universe, and discover the laws underlying all of nature and…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Divine Command Theory

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages

    A large demographic study by Pew Research Centre in 2010 found that 55% of the world 's population identified with one of the three Abrahamic religions, i.e. Judaism, Christianity, or Islam (Pew Research Center, 2012). The significance of these religions is due to the fact that they are the most popular monotheistic religions - religions who worship one god as the supreme creator or prime-mover. Among these 3.8 billion people there will of course be degrees of conviction with some believing that God is all that really matters, while others will lean more towards secular humanist views. Those that hold God above all else generally believe that God is their only guide to morality. In this essay I will discuss the main moral theories that deal…

    • 1402 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to King, “A just law is a man made code that squares with the moral law or the law of God” whereas “an unjust law is a human law that is not rooted in eternal law and natural law” (King, 3). Both authors specifically tell us that we must only refuse to follow unjust laws since they deny us of our natural…

    • 1563 Words
    • 7 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dark Ghettos Essay

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Natural Law theorists argue that moral standards are based on the objective nature of the world and that legal standards derive their authority from these moral standards. Aquinas argues that law is, “Nothing else than an ordinance of reason for the common good, promulgated by him who has the care of the community.” This is very similar to Austin’s command theory, in which laws are commands by a sovereign to citizens, and commands are orders that are backed up by threats. The difference here is that the sovereign can only give orders to their citizens if they are a good person. Aquinas argues that just laws are consistent with natural law and are thus unbreakable, but unjust laws are inconsistent with natural law and are thus…

    • 957 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Primary Source Of Law

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages

    There are a number of sources of American law, but the primary sources of law in the United States are statutes and ordinances, constitutional law, administrative law and common law (case law). (Miller, 2017). Each source of the law is derived from a different authority. Constitutional law is the body of law derived from the United State Constitution and the constitutions of the various states. A constitution defines how the government is to be organized and the extent of its powers and responsibilities.…

    • 201 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The genre of Deuteronomy 6:1-9 is law. Law was God’s gift to Israel, a covenant or promise that he made with them that if they lived Godly lives, they would be fruitful in the land he would give them. Often times when people today think of the word “law”, they associate it with being controlled, but in this context it wasn’t seen as a way to hold people back. While it was Israel’s constitution, the main purpose of law was to instruct the Israelites on how to thrive in the promised land and have a strong connection with God. Aside from those unique characteristics, there are six important principles to be aware of when interpreting law.…

    • 997 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Constitution was drafted in 1787 and ratified by the states in 1789. In the Case of Marybury v. Madison, the Supreme Court ruled that it had powers to interpret the Constitution. According to legal resources, constitutional law deals with the fundamental principles by which the regime exercises its ascendancy. In some instances, these principles grant concrete powers to the regime, such as the puissance to tax and spend for the welfare of the population. Other times, constitutional principles act to place limits on what the regime can do, such as enjoining the apprehending of an individual without sufficient cause.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Divine command theory is a meta - ethical theory which states that an action is obligatory if and only if, it is commanded by God. In this essay, I will examine whether any form of divine command theory is defensible. In defence, I shall begin by looking at the modified theory as proposed by Robert Adams. Secondly, I will attempt to assess objections from Plato, Austin and Wainwright; before proceeding to evaluate whether these objections are successful in demeaning this theory. Let us take the modified version of the divine command theory , as proposed by Robert Adams (1987); in defence of the original theory.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Concepts of freedom and morality gained a lot of momentum during the Enlightenment period. The Enlightenment period saw a shift from the main line of thinking from religion to reason. Because of this shift of the dominant ideologies, philosophers attempted to explain morality through empirical means rather than attributing morality to God. Two of the most influential philosophers of this period were Immanuel Kant and Jean-Jacques Rousseau. This essay will show how Kant’s perspective of freedom and morality was inspired by Rousseau and how the way in which Kant’s view of freedom relates to his idea of the moral law is due to his view of autonomy.…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In “The Ethics of Natural Law,” C.E. Harris explains the views of natural-law theorists. First, he states that the moral standard of natural law is that the actions that promote the values that follow the natural inclinations of human beings are right. These values include life, procreation, knowledge, and sociability. Anything, such as murder, birth control, stifling intellectual curiosity, or spreading lies, that opposes these four natural inclinations is wrong. Then, Harris notes that natural-law theory is absolutist, explaining that no values specified by natural inclinations may be violated and values cannot be measured or compared.…

    • 588 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The concept of ‘law’ has proven itself a tricky one to articulate. Despite its relevance within society, it is hard to condense the idea of law down to its core tenets. In their quest for a concise definition, legal theorists have approached law from different angles, and have tended to divide themselves into two groups – those who believe that any summation of law must include reference to morality, and those who believe that the idea of law either can or must be completely distinguished from any moral considerations. This essay will consider the views of hard and soft legal positivists Joseph Raz and H.L.A. Hart, and natural law theorist Thomas Aquinas, in order to argue that, while all of these theories capture something of the relationship…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are a few differences between natural law and legal positivism. However, before diving into the differences, a definition for both the theories should be provided. Basically, a natural law is a law in which is derived from the validity of morality and reasoning. Natural law is believed to be served on the best interest of the common good as well. For legal positivism, it is viewed in the source of a law has no connection between reasoning and morality.…

    • 833 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays