Social mobility is is the ability for people move between the different classes defined in social stratification. It looks at how many people are able to move up from a lower quintile, move down from a higher quintile, or where the people in the middle quintile end up. This can me measured over a person's life, or from passing on through generations. In both cases, though the numbers are different, they tend to lead to the same thing. The people in the middle quartile have an almost equal chance of going either direction, whereas the bottom tend to stay more in the bottom, and the top tend to stay more in the top. This seems contradictory from my statement earlier about how america is a meritocracy, but it isn’t contradictory at all. This is just an average. Many people are able to move up, or at least get out of the bottom. With that, many people at the top tend to lose their position. And the people at the top who have a higher chance of staying at the top, have that because of unequal opportunities. Meritocracy just looks at the skills. Is it possible that the people at the top stay there because they have more skills, access to a better education, and they get in early so they have a lot more
Social mobility is is the ability for people move between the different classes defined in social stratification. It looks at how many people are able to move up from a lower quintile, move down from a higher quintile, or where the people in the middle quintile end up. This can me measured over a person's life, or from passing on through generations. In both cases, though the numbers are different, they tend to lead to the same thing. The people in the middle quartile have an almost equal chance of going either direction, whereas the bottom tend to stay more in the bottom, and the top tend to stay more in the top. This seems contradictory from my statement earlier about how america is a meritocracy, but it isn’t contradictory at all. This is just an average. Many people are able to move up, or at least get out of the bottom. With that, many people at the top tend to lose their position. And the people at the top who have a higher chance of staying at the top, have that because of unequal opportunities. Meritocracy just looks at the skills. Is it possible that the people at the top stay there because they have more skills, access to a better education, and they get in early so they have a lot more