Social Darwinism Is The Survival Of The Fittest

Improved Essays
Social Darwinism is the idea that all people are influenced by the laws of nature as proposed by Charles Darwin. The laws of Darwinism can be simply put as the “survival of the fittest”, meaning that those of a superior intellect, strength, personality and overall opportunity will come through the other side, while the less fortunate, less intelligent and frailer individuals will be more or less “weeded out”. Upon thinking about whether or not I agree with Social Darwinism I realized that I seem to be torn. On one hand I do agree with the idea that there are individuals who are naturally more inclined to succeed and prosper in life due to things such as superior intellect or personality. My whole life I have heard phrases from my father that

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Murderball Stereotypes

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Those who are at the top have superior genes. Those who are at the bottom have inferior genes. The concept of Social Darwinism does not apply to the film examples. Most people who are disabled are not born with the defect. For example, Mark Zupan became paralyzed due to a car accident that had occurred in the past.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This can be summed up as, Social Darwinism, a nineteenth century philosophy which essentially held that society…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The theory of Social Darwinism basically stated that the wealthy would grow in power, while the poor would weaken. It was used to justify immoral business practices, colonization, imperialism, and military actions of the day. Some of these problems had relations to unsanitary living conditions, low wages, long hours, unsafe working conditions, child labor, no access to education, racism, discrimination, segregations, female suffrage, etc. Theodore…

    • 493 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the Gilded age, many people adapted the idea of Social Darwinism. William Graham said in the course reading, William Graham Sumner on Social Darwinism (ca. 1880), “According to Social Darwinists, evolution was as natural a process in human society as in nature, and government must not interfere.” People believed that it was every man for himself, a very individualist society. In the same time-period, we see a rise of unions, through sources such as the course reading, “Unionist Samuel Gompers Asks, ‘What Does the Working Man Want?’…

    • 685 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Spencer was known for his sociological theories, which were linked with Charles Darwin’s theory of natural selection to create the Social Darwinism theory. Upper class people often used the Social Darwinism theory to justify American imperialism, because it allowed them to explain and justify the gap between the poor and rich social classes. The theory argued that groups of people compete with one another to get to the top – whether it be the top of economical, political, or social hierarchies – much like groups of animals and plants do. So, those that reach the top naturally deserve the spot they earned because they proved themselves to be the best adapted, and they will most likely pass the beneficial adaptations to their children. Spencer, considered the chief supporter of Social Darwinism, also invented the term “survival of the fittest”.…

    • 1502 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to Charles Darwin, evolution also applied to human society. The theory of evolution stated those who were best adapted to their environment would survive and prosper. Horatio Alger, who was a supporter of Social Darwinism, believed that America was a place where hard work ethic, honesty, and education would allow individuals to create their own success and overcome any obstacles.…

    • 1068 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Social Darwinism was used by social reformers to be able to have a larger position in government and was known as Darwinists. They urged the need of establishments and development of knowledge for the changing world. They even used evolution to explain the increasing beliefs of equality of the lack there of. They believed that particular race and wealthier groups were above other people and were eugenics, or well-born. They wanted to restrict marriage and reproducing to those of the race and those that are criminals or mentally ill would not be able to at all.…

    • 1603 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Natural Selection Dbq

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Another scientist that supported Darwin’s theory was Karl Pearson. He argues that history shows the rough struggle of how humans that are stronger survive. He simply says that while it is rough, it is the way it is (Doc. 7). It is not surprising that he would take this view, as he is a scientist as well as Darwin. All of these authors clearly show examples of Social Darwinism in their writings.…

    • 679 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Social Darwinism was an idea of Darwin 's Theory of Evolution in which they used Natural selection and survival of the fittest to establish the division of the race. This theory began racism, “a product of the complex interaction in a given society of a race-based worldview with prejudice, stereotyping, and discrimination.” ( Wikipedia) in the United States. There has been some improvement in America on racism, but it does not justify the fact that racism should not even exist in the first place. In the 19th century, After the American Civil War, racial segregation and Jim Crows laws was established in some parts of South…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Social Darwinism is the psudoscience which applies Charles Darwin’s theory of evolution and survival of the fittest to human society. It posits that human society (and individuals in said society) evolves over time; the strongest societies and people survive and dominate and/or assimilate the weak. The favored theory of egoists of the late 1800’s to early 1900’s, it justified the domination of the poor, downtrodden, and minority as progress. As we can see in Carnegie’s quote above, it was the favored view of the extremely wealthy as well. It allows them to feel contented in opulence without empathising with a lower people.…

    • 1725 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When these two theories emerged, sociologists and psychologists termed “Social Darwinism.” Social Darwinism, explains that the only people who are fit enough to live in a society belong there, thus if one was upper class in the early 19th century, they were the fittest and belonged on…

    • 989 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Essay On Social Darwinism

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages

    One of the key reasons for the general mistreatment of one ethnic group by a larger, more powerful one is that the underrepresented group is seen by the latter as standing in the way of political, social, or economic development. These are all key factors as the mainstream culture attempts to assimilate the lesser and encourage them to “progress” while they refuse to do so. Their refusal causes indignation on the part of the mainstream public, leading to unfortunate social crises. However, the most devastating effects tend to happen to indigenous populations when newcomers begin to take advantage of natural resources and experience an economic boom as a result. This leads to exploitation of the land and, tragically, the people who are closest…

    • 1003 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Social Darwinist Theory

    • 2020 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The Social Darwinist theory is based on an idea that a culture will become extinct because they have not evolved enough to survive the new world and will die out from natural selection (Hollinsworth 1998, p. 39). A culture would be targeted on how their characteristics way differ to another culture, for example by their wealth, race, class, power, behaviour and their intelligence (Hollinsworth 1998, p. 38). They were considered to be like children which gave the excuse for evolved cultures to survey and dominate. The Social Darwinist theory related the Indigenous community to apes because they were considered a primitive culture and were thought to be a closer relation to the Stone Age. The comparison also came to compare their brain size and intelligence to apes.…

    • 2020 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Natural selection is a concept that has long since interested me, I consider it to mean “survival of the fittest”. Thus, looking upon this title, I deduced that the metaphor, which is used for comparison, implies the following principles of natural selection apply to knowledge development: there is variation in knowledge, the ‘fittest’ knowledge is most suitably adapted to the environment, and superseded knowledge is not fit to survive. Questions and doubts thereby arise: What is meant by the term ‘fittest’? Does the metaphor convey an accurate perception of development in knowledge? Does knowledge that is unfit not truly survive?…

    • 1600 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Over the years scholars have misinterpreted the belief of Social Darwinism as a dramatic social change in history but Social Darwinism is more then that. We can take a look in why society today and how history has been in the past by understanding the concept of “survival of the fittest”. We have to understand the connection that is being made with racism and imperialism to better understand the concept of social darwinism. This connection is brought up with the belief that a certain group may be stronger than the other or that they're just simply better than anyone. Here is where the roots of social darwinism crept from.…

    • 674 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays