I would like to take notice how you start your novel off as you, Mr. Vonnegut, describing how Slaughterhouse Five came to be. I appreciate how you start off mentioning you have changed all the names in order to protect those involved, I find this very noble of you. I absolutely love Bernard V. O 'Hare, I love the idea of him. He seems like he was a great help in the writing process of your book and a great friend when you needed one. Bernard 's wife, Mary scares the living daylights out of me, but I admire her protective nature over her husband when it came down to it. It makes sense that Mary and you would have to become friends at some point, considering she is the wife of your good friend, and this is your book. I 'm sure even if she hadn 't befriended you, you would have still put it in your book because you 're the author Vonnegut, and you can do whatever you …show more content…
This isn 't an antiwar book, this is a tragic story. Billy going crazy didn 't have to be a critical part of the story; some people come back from war just fine. Billy is already crazy, why did you have to make him go insane? Billy 's condition could lead him to death, there has already been so many deaths and now you want to kill the man who makes your story? I don 't think so. You better think this through much more carefully next time Vonnegut. I will not have the main character die, those do not make for good antiwar books, just tragic books. On page 102, you dare to tell me Billy does not like life at all, well there 's no wonder he doesn 't like it! Kurt Vonnegut you gave him a more than miserable life and I don 't blame him at all. He could have been okay, he could have gotten help, but you had to give him a condition, and make him hide his condition from everyone who knew and loved