Scientific Advancement In Frankenstein

Improved Essays
In this world there are positives and there are negatives. For every action there is a reaction. Scientific advancement is necessary in society and has been present for thousands of years. It’s seen everywhere in the world from the first invention of the wheel to the modern-day car. Sadly, sometimes there are some unpredicted consequences like in the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Victor creates a creature that ends up having terrible consequences to his health and life. For a long time he isn’t able to see his family and he becomes so sick that he has to be nursed back to health. No matter the consequences scientific advancements are necessary to furthering society. People may say no that it is never ok to put a life on the line for science, …show more content…
They ask how could someone risk a life for science how can the test be so important that some needs to put a life on the line. Many inventions and ideas have been brought to life after someone risked their life to get to their goal. The first men on the moon could have been shot out of orbit, but they took the risk and ended up reaching their goal. In the book Frankenstein by Mary Shelley, Victor comes to the edge of killing himself because all he does is focus on his creature. He says, “For this I deprived myself of rest and health” (Shelley 42). Victor was so devoted and inspired by his creature that he broke the set laws of science to create it. He may have been stepping on death's doorstep but that didn’t stop him because it was his passion and his love. This is same for people today, they will go to large heights and the lowest depths just to discover a few new numbers in a theory. No matter what is said or if something puts them on death's doorstep they will find a way out because they have a passion that moves them to their end …show more content…
If a scientist were to give his life for 10,000 people he would be thought of as a hero right? A lot of people would be told it's not worth it that they should value their life the same as 10,000 lives. “As what happened last month when 15 Alzheimer's patients suffered brain inflammation after taking an experimental vaccine.”(Onion, 20) Many people suffer from Alzheimer's on a daily basis and if one drug was able to cure them but it had to hurt those 15 people first they wouldn't care they would go for it. People need to see sometimes that the reward outweighs the risk in this tricky game of life. Sometimes someone must make a huge sacrifice for the outcome of

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The novel “The Life of Henrietta Lacks” raises many controversies between ethics and science due to the fact that ethics was not yet a crucial role in science. Scientists have been experimenting on Henrietta’s cells (HeLa) cells for decades, and even now the cells are being used in labs. Since the HeLa cells divide indefinitely, scientists can study and analyze them without running out of supplies. Over the years, these cells have greatly contributed to science, but more specifically, the vaccine for polio. Polio is an infectious disease caused by a virus that claimed thousands of lives worldwide.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Do you think we can sacrifice few persons to make others happier? I don’t think so. Many people might say yes to this question because no one thinks that you or your family will be the few persons to be sacrificed and logically, help thousands of people by sacrificing few people might sound nice for human beings. However, scientists may make poor decisions because of their passion for discovery and we cannot forget about the respect for fundamental human rights. In the book The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks written by Rebecca Skloot, she writes about experiments back in the mid-twentieth century when she says, “They recruited hundreds of African-American men with syphilis, then watched them die slow, painful, and preventable deaths, even…

    • 1099 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a world where everything must be donned “good” or “bad’, one has to ask the obvious question, is the science and experimentation in the novel Frankenstein good or bad? Victor Frankenstein sets a precedent of what not to do when you want to perform a science experiment. For this creature to be constructed out of absolutely nothing, Frankenstein must had to “desire it with an ardor that far exceeded moderation” which is unnecessary (p. 45). When someone wants something that bad, it needs to be planned out and organized, not thrown together with no regard to the safety of others. He wanted it more out of selfishness and didn’t realistically think about it and consider the consequences, thus resulting in a catastrophe.…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite going against what is ethically right in invading Henrietta lacks somatic rights, the world has seen a myriad of disease antidotes. Still to this day even, “[her] cells have become the standard laboratory workhorse”(Stump 131). If they had not taken HeLa cells for research, there’s no way to tell if we could have suffered a mutilating cost. Without the cures HeLa cells have done, we could have reached an apocalyptic scene where those very diseases that were cured might have spread across the world, killing millions. The Executive Director of the Presidential Commissions Lisa M. Lee states, “The benefits of research have to outweigh the risks to the individuals involved” (Stump 131).…

    • 720 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Exploring the Unknown Science is one that is often thought of as a methodical process. Students are taught to follow a set group of rules to achieve a predictable result. But, once these students are actually engaged in the reality of the scientific world, they find out that scientific research is far more complex and adventurous expanding beyond this simple ruleset they are presented with They learn that science embraces the risk of being wrong and pushes its pursuer to explore knowledge that had previously never been explored. Scientists are expected to grasp knowledge that no one had ever before been presented with, making the field of scientific research one filled with risk and unpredictability. In the excerpt from The Great Influenza,…

    • 1185 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Having a significant amount of knowledge and power to create and bring life into this world with the inovation of science can kead to a social destruction against man kind. Going against humanity and letting the power of science interfere with society with what us considered "normal" is frightining and morbid. In the classic novel, Frankeinstein by Mary Shelley, a life was created by Victor Frankenstein using the power of science and knowledge. Although Frankeinstein proved to himself that using the correct tools and with dedication you can create and make anything happen it also caused danger and destruction with the i teraction between the monster and humans.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The intern sighed as she threw away, yet again the remains of a manipulated human embryo into the receptacle. As the intern began to clean the petri dish that once held such a small but significant life, she wondered how the rest of the scientists took killing an innocent life so lightly. Stem cell research is beneficial because it helps to further the research towards the cure of diabetes, cancer, other various diseases and illnesses, and the advancement in the growth of such stem cells also helps further the research in organ growth. However, some ways the scientists conduct and carry out stem cell research is neither morally correct nor practical. Stem cell research helps further the advancement in the curing of diseases such as diabetes…

    • 1294 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Victor Frankenstein was not responsible with his advancement and it ended in his own doom. What if he had not fled his creation or had taken more control of the situation? What would responsible scientific advancement…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Gilsinger 1 Amanda Gilsinger 10th Honors English Lit/Comp 11 August 2014 The Power of Knowledge, As Seen in Frankenstein Percolating under the surface of Mary Shelley’s book Frankenstein is the pursuit of knowledge and the negative effects that it can have on one’s life if gone awry.…

    • 1368 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Shelley viewed the exponential growth of science as a danger to society. To her view science would isolate the humanity from the individual. This is represented in Frankenstein who isolates his humanity to achieve greatness. If an individual is not prepared to control himself with an overwhelming amount of knowledge they are in danger of losing their will, or even their sanity, which occurred to Frankenstein. Frankenstein states this in the book, “Increase of the old knowledge only discovered to me more clearly what a wretched outcast I was.…

    • 1016 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Is Scientific Advancement really beneficial? In Mary Shelley’s novel, Frankenstein, the plot conveys that a an extremely heightened passion for the sciences has very detrimental effects, as the tone in the early part of Victor’s narrative suggests. As a result, in a sequence of events, scientific advancement can unintentionally lead one to turn into a monster. As a result of numerous scientific advancements, many people are harmed. Therefore, while part of Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein illustrates the benefits of scientific advancement, the bulk of the plot mostly conveys the potential detriment and destructiveness that comes with progress.…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    His tale could be seen as a warning against pushing too hard to learn scientific mysteries. The theme may not be that the pursuit of all knowledge and discovery is dangerous and wrong. But Victor Frankenstein pushed his search past what was morally acceptable or healthy. He explained, “Who shall conceive the horrors of my secret toil, as I dabbled among the unhallowed damps of the grave, or tortured the living animal to animate the lifeless clay? I seemed to have lost all soul or sensation but for this one pursuit”…

    • 550 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Inventors have the ability to make a creation that can lead to cause both intended and unintended consequences. In Mary Shelley's, book Frankenstein, the main character, Victor created a monster that was intended to extend a life of a person. Instead of extending the life of a person, the monster ended up hurting those he encountered. Tenner’s book, Why Things Bite Back, discusses how technological advancements change the future of humanity negatively.…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Frankenstein knows that his work and research would not be accepted in his society. He also suspects that his work is wrong. “Who shall conceive the horrors of my secret toils?” But even after all the scientific research that he has done, his results are unsatisfactory to his needs. He calls his creation a “catastrophe” and a “monster”.…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Science? Science is an orderly and sensible methodology to finding how a thing in the world works. Although, individual’s beliefs can affect coming up with theories, Science is based on facts, not opinion or preferences. So who are scientists? Firstly, the primary part of a scientist is to make new revelations that will propel human learning by studying and observing the scientific method to collect evidence in an experiment related to their hypothesis, hoping that they will come up with a theory with the results.…

    • 1139 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays