Marx Vs Rousseau Social Contract

Improved Essays
The social contract, which is agreed upon by the majority of the citizens is based on the general will of the people, that aims for the common good of each individual in the state. It aims at structuring the state, so that people can live in a civilized society as well as pleasing each individual. However it also intends to create rules and laws, which construct a safe and secure environment for the citizens of the said state. Thus it is based on laws rather than power. Being a part of this contract one has to give up ‘the physical freedom’ that is to do any thing one pleases to do, yet one gains the ‘civil freedom’ of acting rationally and morally. By agreeing to the social contract citizens agree to a civil society that is build upon laws …show more content…
In order for the social contract to succeed and for people to live happily together, laws are created and shall be obeyed and respected by the citizens as well as by the government and rulers. Laws are what the citizens desire the most in a state; ultimately they are recorded as what the citizens hope the state shall provide them. Rousseau believes that those rules and laws are the soul of the state. The beauty of rules is that people would obey them yet lose …show more content…
“[T]he severity of penalties is only a vain resource, invented by little minds to substitute terror for that respect which they have no means of obtaining” . Thus, according to Rousseau the government should make the laws match the general will of the people additionally instead of using punishment and terror the government should try to prevent it in the first place and “establish the reign of virtue” , which will contribute to the prevention of crimes in the state. The term “morality” has a huge importance within the limits of the state and especially the civil state that is conducted upon the social contract. In order to reach mortality citizens need to become virtuous and come together for the common good and the general will of the state. When Citizens understand the significance of laws to their common good, they will start to respect them and act accordingly to their duties. Rousseau further on claims that in order for the social contract to be successful, citizens must love their duties. It’s not enough to be virtuous but it’s very important to love and respect our duty toward the state. “But when citizens love their

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Essentially, this meant that the government would work for the people, taking into account their requests and sentiments. As a philosopher, Jean-Jacques Rousseau believed in individuality and individual freedom. He understood that humans were all different and each believed in separate ideas, needing varied things. He trusted that if people committed to honest and righteous morals, forms of government could function properly (4). In his writings he said, “Laws are, properly speaking, only the conditions of civil association.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Enlightenment Dbq

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau lived from 1712 to 1778, was one of the most influential philosophers during the Enlightenment in 18th century in Europe. Rousseau argued that the people and the government form a social contract. The people allow the government to have power over them, they consent to be governed. In return, the government promises to protect the rights of the people. Rousseau believed that the right of individuals to be free is one of the most important things that people have. Because of this, he believed that a good government had to protect those…

    • 430 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jean-Jacques Rousseau was a Parisian philosopher in the 18th century. Rousseau is best known for his book, The Social contract, which was published in 1762. The Social Contract was the idea that, as stated in the ICivics article, “In order to have real authority, government must be based on an agreement, or contract, people make with society. Rousseau believed that the majority shall rule, which…

    • 471 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “As it is possible to disobey with impunity, disobedience is legitimate; and, the strongest being always in the right, the only thing that matters is to act so as to become strongest.” (Rousseau, pg. 16) The lawmakers in the congress are expecting that citizens are required to obey the laws, but the congress considered to force the citizens to follow the laws. “To renounce liberty is to renounce being a man, to surrender the rights of humanity and even its duties.” (Rousseau, pg. 19)…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rousseau’s social contract theory supported people 's sovereignty where he states, “Man is born free, but everywhere he is in chains.” Rousseau realizes that the equality of the people in a state of nature is very assorted as people freely try to gain an edge over one another. The Declaration of Independence voices that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed.” Democracy has power from the consent of the governed and exists to secure the rights of the people. The power of voice given to the people in a republic is through congress.…

    • 842 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rousseau believed that when a person enclosed land and took ownership they were the founder of civil society (Rousseau p. 84). This idea brought about the social contract. Wealthy individuals were encouraging of this contract to ensure that what they obtained in the State of Nature was secure (Rousseau p. 98). Of course, due to this idea the poor did not disagree with this and followed it to ensure when they become rich, they would also have protection. Rousseau also goes on to write that as long as there is a social contract, universal suffrage will be necessary.…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to The Social Contract, once people can no longer survive in a primitive state, they willingly enter the social contract, and lose their animalistic ways. According to Rousseau, “Man loses by the social contract his natural liberty, and an unlimited right to all that tempts him, and which he can obtain; in return he acquires civil liberty, and proprietorship of all he possesses… In addition we might add to the other acquisitions of the civil state that of moral liberty, which alone renders a man master of himself; for it is slavery to be under the impulse of mere appetite, and freedom to obey a law in which we prescribe for ourselves” (Rousseau, 79-80). Unlike Locke, Rousseau believed that…

    • 1235 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The specific thoughts of Rousseau and Mill on freedom, the significance of social contracts, individual versus social freedom, and government’s role…

    • 1838 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Social contract theory is based on the view that our moral and political obligations depended on a widely held agreement to form our current society. The benefit to living in this type of arrangement is that it protects our most basic rights. One of the drawbacks is that it is up to society as a whole to create some kind of balance between moral responsibility and personal freedom. So for a price (limited freedom) we receive in exchange a government who promises to protect us from people who might want to harm us.…

    • 373 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Indeed, Rousseau believed in the equity within the members of the society. He showed the close relationship between equality and freedom in his writing, especially in his book “The Social Contract”(1762). According to him, the nature of man is resistant to inequality by nature; it does not have to confront others, asking them to prove anything. Far from seeking concrete ways to achieve a society that respects freedom, Rousseau seeks a universal standard by which to judge the legitimacy of companies. According to his beliefs, “men are born free, their liberty belong to them, and no one…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monique Wilder Professor David Hill SSP 101.7920 July 15, 2015 Midterm 1) Explain the main differences and similarities between the ideas of Hobbes and Locke’s. Similarities include: rights, state of nature, atheism, powers of a sovereign, and the idea that governments are beneficial. John Locke and Thomas Hobbes are two social contract theorist who share similarities in their Social Contract Theories, however they both have differences. The social contract theory is a voluntary agreement among individuals by which organized society is brought into being and invested with the right to secure mutual protection and welfare or to regulate the relations among its members.…

    • 908 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Social Contract Author: Jean-Jacques Rousseau (1762) Introduction His books were a blue print on how Rousseau wanted to know the reasons of why the people gave up their natural liberty over the state of nature. How the political standpoint became such an impact in people’s lives. One of the things he did state in his book that stuck out to me was that, “Man is born free, and everywhere he is in chains.”…

    • 900 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ‘general will’ would now govern the states, taking away one’s natural rights, but gaining them civil liberties. According to Rousseau, the ‘general will’ was when man gave power to the majority and essentially hoped that they would govern correctly. By following the guidelines set out than one would essentially be governing themselves because the guidelines of society are set up with consideration for the ‘general will’. Rousseau valued the idea of people’s sovereignty and for him the state, ‘general will’, laws, and guidelines were…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The people understood that they are the power and centerpiece holding everything together. He also truly enjoyed how the people would come together as a whole to discuss the issues face to face that were happening on all levels from the government to the people. Hobbes was quite the opposite of this however which led Rousseau to maintain such a firm stance with him as well as Grotius. Rousseau’s legacy is based mainly on two concepts found in his work with the idea of the Social Contract Theory. However, the purpose of Rousseau 's philosophy and his approved government is essentially the idea that if all problems are met with the unity of the people and dealt with accordingly using his Social Contract Theory.…

    • 1840 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Again, this seems to be a critique of the law of nature, where the strongest are the ones fit to survive, which would follow Natural Law, but not the rules of the Social Contract. Obeying because one is forced to due to the “might” of a ruler is not the same as one obeying because of their moral obligation. Furthermore, he rejects the notion of “might makes right” for the reasoning that God chose the “mighty” to rule and therefore the ruler should be obeyed, as God is the source of the Natural Law, and that goes against the notions of the Social Contract. Natural Law is a point of contention for Rousseau, as he seems to change his opinion of believing it or not depending on which idea will better support his argument. However, he does establish that there was definitely something present for us in our state of nature that we found an equal in with the Social…

    • 1264 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays