Pros And Cons Of John D. Rockefeller

Great Essays
Caroline Poston
Wolf 9:30
How did the business practices of John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie affect federal legislation aimed at tighter regulation on business and industry?

“These men, they were absolutely revolutionary in the making and foundation of the modern day business. They completely industrialized the new world and propelled America into a new era of progress and success.” (Clif Poston) Robber Barons such as John D. Rockefeller and Andrew Carnegie were known to the new world as titans and captains of their industry. These men used extreme tactics to climb the industrial ladder and eventually monopolize their industry. Carnegie and Rockefeller’s monopolistic tendencies were the driving force that called
…show more content…
Rockefeller was given a small $100 loan from his father to buy a boat to extract oil. By 1870, Rockefeller owned and controlled more than 90% of U.S oil supply and successful refineries. During his time as top dog, Rockefeller was accused of extreme and unethical business practices. Carnegie shared the makings of Rockefeller. Carnegie rose through the rankings of the steel industry. He began as an apprentice and learned the trade of the Bessemer Process that he brought back to the US and began his own steel production. Each one of these men set a high standard in their field, and strived to accomplish greatness by revolutionizing industry. However, both Rockefeller and Carnegie used predatory like business tactics to achieve their success, which led to the passage of legislation making such practices illegal due to their monopolistic …show more content…
But in the late 1800’s there was an outcry to investigate the industries controlling the market. The act prevented the industries from obtaining too much power, however, the act was not effective. The vague language used in the Sherman Antitrust Act proved it easy for companies to find legal loopholes, allowing them to engage in otherwise restricted business. To combat the negative stigma around the vague language of the Sherman Antitrust Act, the federal government passed the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914 to further clarify the principles and terms of the previous Sherman Antitrust Act. The Sherman Antitrust Act deemed monopolies unconstitutional and made them illegal, but the Clayton Antitrust Act defined illegal certain business and further clarified the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Rockefeller and his success with the oil industry. Folsom shines a positive light on Rockefeller, describing in detail what a generous philanthropist and entrepreneur he was. Rockefeller has been a victim of slander for decades and Folsom reveals his true nature and character in this chapter. Rockefellers main business goal was that his product was “for the poor man and he must have it cheap and good.” Rockefeller wanted to sell the best product at the lowest price because he believed in consumers profiting from him- not vice versa.…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gilded Age Dbq

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Like Andrew Carnegie for example he built a giant steel empire. His business increased profits, and also eliminated middle men. And also John D Rockefeller standard oil company he sold one type of product in numerous markets. These two men didn’t care much about consumers and did everything they could to increase profits. Labor didn’t work as well as big businesses did.…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gilded Age Dbq Analysis

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Once a company had achieved a monopoly and made it difficult for their products to be bought from any competitors, they would often raise prices. However, these practices were unprecedented and were justified by the ideas of Social Darwinism. Company owners had to be fierce and buy out competitors to survive in the cutthroat business world. The…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Rachel Bewersdorf Mrs. Wolgast US History Monday August 24 Captains of Industry vs. Robber Barons I personally think that these both powerful and successful industrialists were not robber barons. I like to think of them as big contributors towards the building and also the success of industry. People like Rockefeller, Carnegie, Vanderbilt and so many others that proved with a lot hard work and confidence it can lead to huge success. These men were the push that America needed to get drawn into the vision of moving to the next thing and maintain the want of being as powerful in the industry and business like all this men were.…

    • 483 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A few of the most giving market entrepreneurs were Andrew Carnegie, James J. Hill, John D. Rockefeller, and Cornelius…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Being a smart business leader Carnegie control every part of the industry from raw material to the finished product knocking out the prices in between. Overall by doing so Carnegie set an example to many people in the U.S of becoming rich. With hard work and smart business tactics…

    • 1042 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Progressive can be defined as a person or group applying social reform or new, profuse ideas. The first progressive president, Theodore Roosevelt, had a very positive impact by transforming the United States into a more modern country and all around a greater country. Roosevelt was one of the most influential people that ever ran the Unites States. This ambitious leader balanced the interests of business, consumer, and laborer. He helped to better America as a country by mainly passing laws that improved working conditions, food and drug companies, and even the environment.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Incorrect Philosophy of Andrew Carnegie During the early nineteenth century, many business moguls began to rise to power, but perhaps none has shaped business in the same way Andrew Carnegie had. The industrial billionaire gave rise to some of the most iconic skyscrapers, railroads, and was responsible for the creation of an abundance of libraries in America. Carnegie’s business and humanitarian efforts have solidified him in the minds of generations of Americans and have earned him the position as one of America’s greatest stories of hard work paying off in multiple areas.…

    • 2369 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, in 1890, congress passed the Sherman Anti-Trust Act to outlaw monopolistic business practices. Despite a near unanimous vote in both chambers, the act “proved difficult to enforce and was soon weakened by the Supreme Court” (Henretta 603). Next, congress passed the Clayton Anti-Trust Act in 1914. This legislation significantly expanded the government 's role in regulating business by prohibiting mergers and acquisitions if the effect “may be substantially to lessen competition, or to tend to create a monopoly” XXX(15 U.S. Code § 18).…

    • 1424 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These individuals created such a strong monopoly over their respected industry. Through their monopolies they eliminated any opposition that stood in their way to make profit and left consumers with just one choice, to buy just from them. Is this just a good way to make business or was this tyranny over the market? Post the Civil war…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ROBBER BARONS Extremely large and powerful industries developed that were owned and dominated by a very small group of men. Four of these highly influential men were Cornelius Vanderbilt, Andrew Carnegie, John D. Rockefeller, and J.P. Morgan. With limited governmental regulation, many of these industries were able to evolve into monopolies and collude amongst themselves, an evolution that generated public outrage at the resulting unfair practices and inequalities. The industries countered the populist response by becoming more involved in politics. Cornelius Vanderbilt.…

    • 1209 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John D. Rockefeller was a robber baron. The thing he wanted most was to have as much of the market as possible, also called a monopoly. In order to achieve that, he reduced his cost. Once he reduced it, he was able to drive other companies out of business. So, as his company expanded, it made it easier for him to drive out all of his competitors out of the race.…

    • 436 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Andrew Carnegie made his fortune that dealt with steel, turning the industrial world into something completely new and different (PBS). With findings of steel came skyscrapers, railroads and even bridges which made the American Industry sky rocket to another level, all thanks to Andrew Carnegie (PBS). He was the creater and master behind it all, and behind things that we even use today. Without him, there would not be any jobs for the workers of this time. They should have accepted the inequality and great wealth in his hands because he is what started creating that time period for them, making their lives easier and more advanced.…

    • 1765 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Rockefeller had reorganized a whole industry in the United…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "Robber Barons" were entrepreneurs that employed any means necessary to better themselves and they didn't care who they had to step on to get there, or, were they just innocent business men who were initiative marketing geniuses? The debate on whether these men were greedy, power hungry, monsters or just innocent business men who had a way with advertisements is one extreme to the next, but these are the two points I will be exploring: greedy monsters or initiative , industrial, urban marketers? Within these two arguments there are very many pros and cons between the two, some cons are that tey are both biased to an extent. They have their own opinion of these fortune 500 businessmen and also have their own opinion or whether they obtained…

    • 947 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays