Postal Rule: One Of The Rules Of Contract Law

Good Essays
Question A.
Yes, this is an enforceable contract. Postal rule is one of the rules of contract law that makes an exception to the general rule that an acceptance can only occur when communicated directly to the offeror. This is considered a legal binding contract as the acceptance match with the offer. It is an enforceable contract due to reasons mentioned below.
4 elements of a contract
The elements to create a legally binding contract are as follows;
1. Legal capacity – a person above 18 years of age and both parties cannot be intoxicated nor have any mental illness is able to make a contract.
2. Agreement – form from an offer and an acceptance.
3. Consideration – exchange of some value that has been agreed by two parties
4. Intention to
…show more content…
When Naiker saw this offer he was overjoyed and in order not to miss the opportunity of buying the piano he immediately posted his letter of acceptance on Friday 6 June. Naiker’s letter only reached Ahmad on Monday 9 June.” This means that even though the letter of acceptance to Ahmad was delayed, it is still considered as acceptance according to the postal rule.
Postal Rule
The postal rule states that;
1. There is an acceptance once the offeree replies the letter and put it in the mailbox.
2. The address and stamp is correct.
(Duhaime, 2014)
Naiker did accept the offer, by mailing out the letter with the right address and stamp. Whether or not Ahmad is aware that Naiker has accepted the offer, this is still a legally binding contract between the two of them as all four elements of a contract as mentioned above are met.
Another reason that made it an enforceable contract is, under the rule of Termination of Offer: Ahmad can revoke the contract at any time before an acceptance is made but it should be noted that the revocation must be directly/indirectly communicated. However Ahmad did not inform about the revocation of the contract with Naiker and had readily sold the item to Janice. Ahmad did not revoke the contract. He just assumed that Naiker was not interested in the piano as he did not receive any response from Naiker in
…show more content…
When the contract is performed, it will be a different contract than the initial one.

3. None of the parties are responsible for the event that happened. - Neither party caused the lightning to strike the hall and the piano in it.
An example of Discharge by Frustration;
Under Destruction of the Subject Matter – in the case of Taylor v Caldwell (1863): the court said that destruction of subject matter of the contract made the contract not possible to be carried out and hence discharging the contract. Ahmad is not able to make any claims for the damages done as once the concert hall burnt down along with his piano, the contract fell into the clause of Discharge of Frustration.
With reference to the above mentioned clause, neither of the parties was responsible to the destruction of the Concert Hall, including Ahmad’s piano. Ahmad is not able to claim for the damages made to his piano due to the following factors:
1. Force Majeure Clause
a. This clause excuses the party from performing any contractual obligations as an unforeseeable event has happened.
2. Discharge by Frustration
a. Neither party was responsible for the destruction of place and

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Ultratra Vires Case Study

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages

    They do not have any legal effect so as to cause any adversity to innocent persons who are not aware with the ability of the company to enter into such contract. The observation made by the court in the landmark case of Ashbury Railway Carriage & Iron Co. V Riche , laid down that an ultra vires contract is void- ab-initio which cannot turn into intra vires by any reason of estoppels, lapse of time, delay or acquiescence. The inability of the company to make any contract has sometimes caused great injustice and hardships to the people who had no knowledge of such incapacity of the company. In the case of Beauforte (Jon) London, Ltd. Re : Jon Beauforte Ltd., company, by its memorandum of association was authorized to practice the business of costumes, gown, robe, dress and mantle makers, tailors and other activities of similar nature. But later on the directors of the company decided to practice on the business of manufacturing veneered panels, which was clearly ultra vires the objective clause of the company.…

    • 806 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Actus Rea

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages

    No facts in this case show Ryan had any involvement in this case. The state cannot charge Zynal and Ryan because the state can’t prove Actus rea and Mens rea. State v Jason and Arooj Issue: Can the state char Jason and Arooj with burglary? Rule: Actus Rea: An act that is voluntary or there is an…

    • 1024 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The COA decided for the appellant. The reasoning upheld from the fact that there might have a mutuality of obligation but they certainly would not compel the conclusion that it was a contract of employment. There was no contract of service as employer was under no obligation to pay the employee as Nadine negotiated her own payment from her clients. Taking economic risk may also constitute the contract invalid. The ET also entitled to conclude that there was no relationship between employer and employee.…

    • 1192 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Legal Law Case Study

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This is because a third party may contract a person otherwise under an existing legal duty to do the act so required. Usain is not an agent of Brie as he was given no authority to act on her behalf and was not purporting to, and is therefore a third party. 3. Certainty The contract is sufficiently certain as the essential terms including price are given. No party has discretion as to performance, and it is sufficiently clear for the courts to enforce.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Hyder V Wrench Case Study

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This offer was rejected, and the plaintiff sought to accept the preliminary offer. It was held that no agreement was made as the underlying offer was ended by the counter-offer. Positive Acceptance mean acceptance must be positive and not passive. In other words the party accepting the agreement should suffer acknowledge an offer. He could not be considered to have accepted his…

    • 1795 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Which is why Ocwen never gave us a straight answer as to who holds this responsibility or who holds our note. FCRA Our claim arising under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), 15 U.S.C. § 1681s was not added to the amended complaint because as Pro Se litigants, we learn as we go. We learned of the violations after we amended our complaint. Our ignorance should not give Ocwen 's illegal business practices a pass.…

    • 1647 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Bob And Carl Case

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The acceptance cannot be revoked regardless of whether notification of revocation is delivered using a more direct method of communication. Posting of acceptance ultimately results in the formation of a contract and as such the offeree cannot unilaterally withdraw, without the agreement of the offeror. This view is represented by the case of Wenkheim v Arndt. If this approach is taken the acceptance cannot be revoked particularly since Carl was uninformed of Bob’s intention to withdraw, because he had ignored the message left on his messaging system. The second approach states that no contract is formed because the offeree has rejected the contract in the first formal communication with the offeror, although the acceptance letter was posted.…

    • 1409 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In the battle of the forms, the last form that was dispatched and received without objection govern the contract. If that is the case, the standard terms proposed by Ben would be the terms of the contract. Nonetheless, it might be evident that they reached agreement during the phone call. Consideration A promise is legally binding only if consideration that is an act or promise is provided in return by the promisee. Ben promise to secure a US team which is sufficient consideration for the promise of payment by Ashley and vice versa.…

    • 1500 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    1. Define and explain the significance of grundnorm. Essentially a grundnorm is an ordinance that states follow to make contracts between each other (J.G. Rumsey, International Law Lecture 2)(Murphy, 11). The significance of this term is that it helps to establish what states can put down on their treaties, so that they have something to refer to and go off of when making such a contract.…

    • 2324 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Caldwell further alleges that there was insufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for the offense of conspiracy to commit burglary of the Alkaline Water Company. The State, for its part, avers that Caldwell’s argument is waived because the issue was never presented to the trial court. Caldwell acknowledges that the issue as to whether the evidence is sufficient to sustain his conviction was not raised before the trial court. Nevertheless, Caldwell asserts that we should engage in plain error review and reverse the conviction. Alternatively, Caldwell contends that review of this sufficiency claim is proper because Caldwell’s trial counsel was ineffective for failing to challenge the sufficiency of the evidence before the trial court.…

    • 1873 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays