community policing(Murray 2005) this is encouraged by certain politicians and departments can get very cheap military surplus. Counterterror highly relies on intelligence, getting information from the community can gather important intelligence on any suspicious activities of possible terrorist. At the end of the 20th century the US was in a community policing phase to combat crime, but the terrorist attacks of 9-11 had changed the strategy of the police and law enforcement from community based to homeland security priorities. There are some key differences from traditional policing and community policing, where tradition is prioritizing law enforcement , arrest and investigation. Community policing puts Society and quality of living as the
…show more content…
Community policing was introduced in korea during the Grand Reform in 1999(Kang, Nalla, Chun 2014). Community policing has been implemented throughout the world like the Middle East(Lebanon), Africa(South Africa, Gambia, Nigeria, and Asia(Afghanistan, Indonesia, India) but different definitions, philosophies, and strategies of community policing but share the core principles like South Korea which are created relations that communicate with the community, respond to citizens, and have organizational structures in departments philosophy and plan(Kang et al 2014). Since it takes 10-15 years for full implementation of community policing(Trojanowicz, Bucqueroux) it 's hard to study new versions of community policing but South Korea has recently hit this 15 year mark which makes it a prime country to study. (Kang et al 2014) Showed college educated officers were more supportive of community policing and motivated to be promoted in the department. Patrol officers, officers with more experience, females, and officers in their 50s all had more positive attitudes towards community policing compared to detectives, new officers, male, and young officers. It 's important for a department to know who is supportive of community policing and how to get full support from members of the department to help make community policing …show more content…
Trojanowicz and Bucqueroux(1992) write these police performance indicators are likely poor ways to evaluate an officer since they don 't take in the quality of life of the community. Community policing is proactive, police are more likely to act on social issues before a crime has happened, in traditional policing it was reactive, which police act only when a crime has happened and focusing on that crime not the reason the crime happened. Without the police facing the real issue this will continue to be a problem ( Wilson Kelling 1989). New York Police have made the connection between disorder and crime, stating that gambling, drunks, and sex workers can create situations that end in violence which creates unsafe and poor standards of living Silverman and Della Giustina(2001).
Broken Windows theory is important to community policing. Wilson and Kelling(1989) showed that crime and disorder are related, which shows if the police are able to keep the community, environment in order it can prevent crime. Popularity of community policing was high in the late 20th century with 85% having some community policing involvement with police departments (Skogan 2004, which was even more popular with big cities. Community involvement is a key to community policing and at the end of the 20th century,
Community policing was introduced in korea during the Grand Reform in 1999(Kang, Nalla, Chun 2014). Community policing has been implemented throughout the world like the Middle East(Lebanon), Africa(South Africa, Gambia, Nigeria, and Asia(Afghanistan, Indonesia, India) but different definitions, philosophies, and strategies of community policing but share the core principles like South Korea which are created relations that communicate with the community, respond to citizens, and have organizational structures in departments philosophy and plan(Kang et al 2014). Since it takes 10-15 years for full implementation of community policing(Trojanowicz, Bucqueroux) it 's hard to study new versions of community policing but South Korea has recently hit this 15 year mark which makes it a prime country to study. (Kang et al 2014) Showed college educated officers were more supportive of community policing and motivated to be promoted in the department. Patrol officers, officers with more experience, females, and officers in their 50s all had more positive attitudes towards community policing compared to detectives, new officers, male, and young officers. It 's important for a department to know who is supportive of community policing and how to get full support from members of the department to help make community policing …show more content…
Trojanowicz and Bucqueroux(1992) write these police performance indicators are likely poor ways to evaluate an officer since they don 't take in the quality of life of the community. Community policing is proactive, police are more likely to act on social issues before a crime has happened, in traditional policing it was reactive, which police act only when a crime has happened and focusing on that crime not the reason the crime happened. Without the police facing the real issue this will continue to be a problem ( Wilson Kelling 1989). New York Police have made the connection between disorder and crime, stating that gambling, drunks, and sex workers can create situations that end in violence which creates unsafe and poor standards of living Silverman and Della Giustina(2001).
Broken Windows theory is important to community policing. Wilson and Kelling(1989) showed that crime and disorder are related, which shows if the police are able to keep the community, environment in order it can prevent crime. Popularity of community policing was high in the late 20th century with 85% having some community policing involvement with police departments (Skogan 2004, which was even more popular with big cities. Community involvement is a key to community policing and at the end of the 20th century,