Essay On Monopolies

Improved Essays
Monopolies Are Not for Losers
Peter Thiel’s argument that monopolies are beneficial to the society in the same way they are to the people who run them is wrong. The PayPal founder provokes this thought in his book “Zero to One” but I personally disagree with his point of view. He claims that “competition is for losers,” and even though his argument might seem legitimate as he is a well known businessman, it is not true that all competing businesses are guaranteed of losing. Only the businesses that are not good enough to compete with other firms lose. Monopolies are harmful not just to consumers, but also to society as they eliminate variety through market domination.
Consequences of Monopolistic Power to The Economy
Regarding the general economics,
…show more content…
It is right to say that due to its dominant position, a monopoly is best placed to bear the risks that are associated with innovation. However, few monopolies take advantage of this factor since they have no competitors. In a competitive environment, as opposed to a monopolistic one, innovation is a necessity and not an option, whether a company can fund research or not. As long as the customers may highly demand the goods and services sold by a monopoly, the organization may show little incentive for improvement or innovation. Therefore, Thiel is not entirely right by saying, “monopolies can keep innovating since huge profit margins enable them to develop long-term plans” (Thiel and Blake 28). Thus, in as much as a monopoly has funds to finance innovation, most of them find innovation less compelling due to lack of competition.
Monopolies in Cable TV As a Case Proof of Harm Caused by Monopolies
In the U.S, an individual cable TV service provider serves several regions, communities, and cities, and even though there is competition in the industry on a national level, the cable providers are monopolies in the local and regional areas they

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Thiel’s view of competition is interesting to say the least. He believes that the worst thing to ever have been taught to entrepreneurs is that competition is healthy. By no means would Thiel find himself promoting the ideals of competition. In his world, monopolies are the best thing in business. Whereas competitors earn no profits according to him, monopolies are out there making profits all to themselves without sharing.…

    • 852 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Monopolies are generally considered to be a disadvantage. However, in some circumstances monopolies can have many advantages for consumer’s social welfare. Having a monopoly means being the only seller, leaving you with no competition. In a monopoly the seller controls the prices of the particular product and or service; they also make the prices. Some of the few advantages of a monopoly are that monopoly avoids duplication and waste of resources, due to the fact monopolies make a lot of profit they can help invest for better technology and resources.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In practice this does not occur. With true unregulated economic freedom, the economic environment allows true unlimited prosperity for both companies and average people. It should allow the concept of ‘risk versus return’ to be directly proportional. Instead, with restrictions on investments that people can make, it undermines the implied economic ‘freedom’. Governments impose sanctions on countries resulting in investments and capital to be frozen or seized.…

    • 1489 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Despite the promotion of society though profit maximisation, the intention of businesses become under scrutiny as their motive is questionable to the point that their beneficiary behaviour is fact selfishness (Mintzberg & Simons, 2002). The only time a business will actively benefit society is when it is in their own self-interest. In other words, they expect society to contribute to their profit maximising scheme whenever they assist the public. But, to popular belief many people think that virtuous behaviour is born by the motivation of selflessness (Fieser, 2012). Our actions deserve praise only when they are done for the goodness of others…

    • 965 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Again, there is no way for an average executive to know this. If someone ignores these warnings and attempts to give back to the community to gain some goodwill for their company, they would only be acting short sighted. Friedman says that this kind of behavior only reinforces the idea that the pursuit of profit is wrong and immoral, even when fair pursuit of profit is what a business is meant for (Friedman,…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Friedman and Social Responsibility of Business Introduction Milton Friedman believed and argued that business people take care of the responsibilities that affect them in their day to day life. However, they don't care the impact their businesses have on the society so long as their market is growing and increasing their profits. The main reason why he argued this is because believing in a reduced impact that the government has and a free-market. He found that government solutions to problems are no better because its solutions are even worse than the problem itself. As a result of his belief, he believed that the government should keep off the businesses activities because of its greed and the quest of people to have access to power.…

    • 1164 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Another counterargument for the utilitarian defense is that solely focusing on profit will lead to a negative outcome due to the complexity of markets. The economic model of social responsibility is considered inappropriate to this theory because it is an unconditioned ethical directive which goes against everything Utilitarians…

    • 1154 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Finally, we hear the argument that our treatment of the environment shows the lengths in which we will be immoral for wealth. However, we have seen businesses turn away from harmful means of production to a healthier alternative. Ultimately, Gandhi is wrong when he says that wealth and morality cannot mix. Wealth does not decay or halt moral and social progress in the societies of the…

    • 1474 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The consumers on the other hand, were affected positively as they were able to buy these goods at a lower price than before. In this situation although corporations would like you to believe otherwise, trade is still advantageous for the U.S. because the gains of the winner still exceed that of the losers. This is rarely felt though as usually the gains are spread more thinly. Corporations being the losers in this situation may lobby to have people believe this situation is a negative one but it is not. International trade no matter if it is exporting or importing is supposed to be beneficial for everyone even if there are winners and losers.…

    • 960 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    A company’s self interest is always prioritized. CSR is only used as a way to make consumers believe that they are helping society. The final accomplishment businesses wish to complete is a big bottom line. Additionally, companies don’t really help out communities, they only pretend to. By using intelligent marketing strategies and launching very inefficient campaigns, consumers can be easily fooled and fail to analyze a company’s true motives.…

    • 1503 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays