Zimbardo And Social Psychology Essay

Great Essays
In 1971, Philip Zimbardo made a huge impact on the field of Psychology. He changed the world of social psychology by taking it from a field focused on behavior being dispositional and transitioned it into a focus on social psychology in the terms of viewing behavior as situational. Gordon Allport, Fritz Heider, Harold Kelley and Bernard Weiner all helped set the stage for personality psychology and social psychology. Each of these individuals touched on the idea of behavior being dispositional until Solomon Asch, Stanley Milgram and Philip Zimbardo introduced the idea that situations influence our actions. Dispositional behavior means that behavior is presented by an internal factor within us (e.g. the environment or culture we grow up in). Stanley Milgram peaked Zimbardo’s interest in testing the dispositional hypothesis through his popular study, the Milgram study. This peak of interest in situational social psychology came from his Stanford prison experiment. The Stanford prison experiment was designed to observe obedience and role …show more content…
For example, The Stanford Prison Experiment, directed by Kyle Patrick Alvarez. This particular movie was filmed for two reasons: student’s today do not have a sense for the 1970s era in which the study took place and students today seem to need to be entertained more than previous generations (Dunn, 2016). With that said, the goal of this film was to portray the power of situation Zimbardo was testing in his experiment. Specifically, Zimbardo strayed from the present belief of behavior being dispositional because he believed situational influences (e.g., social pressure, norms, roles) often override people’s personalities, character, and expectations for how they should or will act (e.g., Nisbett, 1980; Ross & Nisbett,

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Stanely Milgram was a social phycologist who conducted an experiment in 1963 about nonviolent people being capable of hurting others due to obeying the authority under pressure despite their feeling of remorse. The way the experiment received progression was by having people play the role of a teacher and a learner. The teacher obeys the authority and the learner had to memorize a certain amount of words. If the learner failed to the duty, he would received a punishment of a dose of high voltage shock. Although the purpose of the experiment was to test how the learner was capable of learning, it to was to test the capability of the teacher to continue the experiment whether or not they felt guilt.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Milgram Obedience Experiment, a series of experiments originating from July 1961, serves as one of the most significant and influential experiments done in history due to its investigation of the conflict between obligation and obedience to authority and personal morality. The experiment was conducted by Stanley Milgram, an American social psychologist that primarily explored social behavior but is best known for the way he tackled the issue of the true power and influence of figures in authority after the Holocaust. Due to the shock of many at the discovery that human beings were capable of such horrible things during the Jewish genocide of World War II, the Milgram Experiment was conducted to identify exactly how the horrible acts of…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram proposed that people operate on two levels. First, they operate as autonomous individuals, where they act according to their own values and beliefs. Second, they act on an agentic level where they see themselves as agents, acting on behalf of somebody else and not responsible for their own actions. He asserted that it is possible to move from an autonomous state into an agentic state; this is referred to as an agentic shift (Milgram, 1963). A consequence of this shift is that an individual no longer feels responsible for their actions.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Zimbardo's experiment displayed that students, when provided authority over others, will take advantage of those below them (76). His experiment also exposed that his chosen setting, a prison, was increasing important due to the fact that the “guards” acted in the same harsh manner as the Abu Ghraib prison guards (76). Lee Ross and Richard E. Nisbett, who co-wrote “The Power of Situations”, concur with Baumrind and Szegedy-Maszak that venue and the overall situation is more important than a person’s character to try to guess what the individual will choose (148-149). These authors effectively prove Baumrind and Szegedy-Maszak’s…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “The Perils of Obedience” written by Stanley Milgram and “Review of Stanley Milgram’s Experiments on Obedience” written by Diana Baumrind are both intriguing articles about Stanley Milgram’s experiments on obedience. Diana Baumrind believes that Stanley Milgram failed at his experiences on obedience rather than succeeded. Stanley Milgram believed that he succeeded on his experiments if an authority figure tells the test subject to do something then the test subject will. “Stanley Milgram designed an experiment that forced participants either to violate their conscience by obeying the immoral demands of an authority figure or to refuse those demands” (Milgram 77). While both authors address experiments on obedience, Stanley Milgram approaches…

    • 812 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Stanley Milgram's Analysis

    • 1254 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In 1963, an experiment was conducted by Yale psychologist Stanley Milgram, who studied the conflict with obedience, authority, and the conscience of a human being. In the experiment, Milgram designed a false scenario, in which one person would volunteer to be the “teacher” and the other person would be the “student” (who would be the actor). The teacher would read a list of word pairs and test the student’s memory. Afterwards, the teacher would say the first word of the word pair and the student would have to answer the second word of the word pair through memorization. However, if the student would get it wrong, then the teacher would shock the student.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Diana Baurind Experiment Analysis

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited

    Because the experiment takes place in a laboratory, Baumrind argues that participants will not act how they might in the real world. She states that the laboratory is an unaccustomed setting for a typical being and may cause anxiety and passivity (225). Correspondingly, Saul Mcleod, a psychologist who summarizes and critiques Milgram’s experiment, states that the “important” location of the experiment, obedience levels increased (Simply Psychology). The point about setting is one in which Baumrind and Parker are able to reach a consensus.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 4 Works Cited
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Studies of sociocultural level of analysis study how the implied, actual, or imagined presence of others affect one's behavior, thoughts, and feelings in different situations. In psychology, ethics must be considered to make sure that the participants are not harmed in any way and that the conducted research is ethically valid. I have chosen to discuss the ethical considerations related to research studies at the sociocultural level of analysis about Milgram's obedience study (1963) and Zimbardo's Stanford Prison Experiment (1973). They are both famous for their lack of ethical considerations, and I am going to discuss how and why they are lacking the ethical considerations. Let's start discussing the Stanford Prison Experiment conducted…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the most influential studies in history that violates present-day ethical guidelines would have to be, The Stanford Prison Experiment. Philip Zimbardo of Stanford University conducted an experiment to examine the behaviors and roles of college students within a mock prison setting in 1971. Zimbardo’s purpose of his Stanford Prison Experiment was to observe the impact of situational influences on behavior. Studies had previously shown that individuals put within the prison system are dehumanized and have behavioral changes during the duration of the period stayed. Zimbardo’s hypothesis of the experiment was to put normal average individuals within the same setting and observe the behavioral changes throughout their stay.…

    • 1496 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The experiment allows for a hierarchy between the students, creating the social classes within the experiment. These classes and roles changed the personalities of the participants, albeit every one of them returned to their state of mind that they had before the experiment. Michael Mechanic discusses in his article “The Slippery Slope of Evil” that people will follow the orders of an authority figure to a fault, as shown by the Milgram Experiment performed years prior to the Stanford Prison Experiment. In the case of the Stanford Prison Experiment, Zimbardo played the role of the authority figure as he was the “superintendent.” With an authority figure present, participants shift the responsibility of their actions onto that person and believe they are not at fault for the consequences of their actions.…

    • 840 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority is one of the best known studies in social psychology. It was repeated several times in different variations. These replications extended our knowledge about the phenomenon of complying to authorities’ orders. One of them was the experiment conducted by Hofling et al. This essay will outline the similarities and differences between these two studies.…

    • 1000 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Milgram’s experiments created great controversy. They showed how vulnerable humans were to the will bending power of authority. This idea especially stuck around the time the experiment took place, the early 1960’s. America was still somewhat fresh off of World War II, and Americans were shocked to see that they were just as capable of being pushed to do things that went against their morals as Germans were under Nazi authorities. Milgram was thorough in his studies by including multiple permutations of the original where he tested subjects responses to different forms of authority.…

    • 1487 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In 1973, Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology at Stanford University conducted a summer experiment showing how humans in would react towards being in closed in a prison environment. He recruited college students and offered to pay them, too many it was more interesting than a summer job. The experiment was supposed to continue for two weeks and the participants would be divided into two group’s containing prisoners and guards. As volunteering prisoners of this experiment they would have to get use to their privacy being violated, as well as being harassed. Zimbardo’s wanted to find out the how long it would take for the prisoners and guards to conform to the roles they were classified as.…

    • 921 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In 1971, Philip Zimbardo, an American psychologist and past president of the American Psychological Association, investigated these reasons for evil through his experiment, called the Stanford Prison Experiment. He randomly picked mentally healthy college students to play roles as prisoners and guards. Under Zimbardo, who was the warden of the prison, the guards psychologically abused the prisoners. From this, Zimbardo learned that the situation over inherent characteristics was what essentially caused the evil behavior behind the guards, and that group pressure played a large role as well. Zimbardo’s idea asserts that “the doers… become an in-group” (Aron) under visible authority; consequently, they “see those not in that groups as out-group…

    • 2075 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    For this assignment we watched the Annenberg media video titled The Power of the Situation. This videos main objective was to teach and assist us in understanding the influence people have over other people. Within this video it listed several research projects and methods that psychologists and scientist have made to help determine and predict human behavior. Many of these experiments were brought out by trying to understand how millions of people could blindly follow problematic leaders such as Adolf Hitler. There were several experiments that were mentioned, I chose to focus on the two that really resonated with me.…

    • 372 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays