Home Page
Opposing Views On Morality And The Hart-Fuller Debate

Opposing Views On Morality And The Hart-Fuller Debate

Improved Essays

Show More

The Hart-Fuller debate focuses on morals and principles and how that dives into law. Hart went he positivist route and stated that law and morals were separate. Fuller's response debated that morality was the source of law and its binding authority. I think this debate is not as prevalent and significant as other debates because the Hart-Fuller debate doesn’t just full on disagree with each other, but come to an understanding on certain aspects.
A positivist (Hart in this debate) believes that morals and principles should not and do not coincide with law making and law decisions. Legal rights and moral rights are not interrelated, it’s just a sheer chance the two overlap. Hart considers the process of determining cases through reason or assumption

Related Documents

Great Essays
James Whitten: Affirmative Defense Of Morality
- 1820 Words
- 8 Pages
James Whitten: Affirmative Defense Of Morality

Question Presented Will James Whitten be successful in claiming the affirmative defense of necessity in driving under a suspended license? Brief Answer Probably yes. In Garner, a person driving under a suspended license may be found not guilty under the affirmative defense of necessity if he was compelled under threat of imminent death or harm to self or others, had a sense of urgency concerning the circumstances that made it necessary for him to violate the law, and that he ceased conduct as soon as the threat subsided.…
- 1820 Words
- 8 Pages
Great Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Ward V Canada Case Summary
- 1169 Words
- 5 Pages
Ward V Canada Case Summary

Although, legal positivist looks at rights because law is associated with rights but not morality because they think law is positive. A legal positivist would not care if the regulation of fishery fell under the federal power or the provincial power, but as far as the legal rule was strictly abided in this case, the would agree with whatever the final judgement…
- 1169 Words
- 5 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
No Duty To Rescue Law: The Three Supreme Court Cases
- 633 Words
- 3 Pages
No Duty To Rescue Law: The Three Supreme Court Cases

The three Supreme Court Cases from our readings all have differing questions, applicable theories of morals, ethics and legal precedence that require consideration. It is crucial to acknowledge that although our Constitution and many laws rely on philosophy, not all legislation is moral, and may even be immoral. I feel the best method is to look at each case and weigh its morals and legality as well. Each of these cases created conflicts within my mind, tested my ability to be impartial, and left me glad I am not a judge. Case #1 involves the No Duty to Rescue Law, which was put to test in New York.…
- 633 Words
- 3 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Decent Essays
Nazis Did Not Have Laws: Why Did The Nazis Have Laws
- 277 Words
- 2 Pages
Nazis Did Not Have Laws: Why Did The Nazis Have Laws

In this essay I am going to defend the position that the Nazis did in fact, have laws. I am going to draw from Hart’s positivism and his stance on the separation of law and morals to explain why the Nazis had laws, and defend it against an objection from Fuller. During WWII, the Nazis laid down a set of laws that allowed them to commit atrocious crimes. They twisted the meanings of the laws to favor their rule, through violence and persecution. There were citizens at the time who took advantage of the laws to punish those they held grudges against by reporting supposedly illegal acts that their rivals had committed to the Nazi authorities.…
- 277 Words
- 2 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Moral Reform In The United States
- 240 Words
- 1 Pages
Moral Reform In The United States

In the 19th Century in the Unites States was a period of tremendous economic and political changes. The radical reform was impose to focus on the issues of antislavery, racial and sexual discrimination. In the 19th Century, there was so much injustice and failed to correct the hostility in their society. The reform movements were aim to make changes rapidly.…
- 240 Words
- 1 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Analysis Of H. L. A. Hart's Conception Of Law
- 838 Words
- 4 Pages
Analysis Of H. L. A. Hart's Conception Of Law

This paper will consider the philosophical question “Did the Nazi ’s have Law?” by drawing off of H.L.A Hart’s conception of law. Hart, being a positivist, believes that law and morality are conceptually separate; law is simply what undergoes the judiciary installment and is enacted by the law-making agency of a society. He concludes that morality is a statement of values which are subjective, hence the reason they can’t be compared to the law which is a statement of facts.…
- 838 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Radbruch Accuses Legal Positivism Analysis
- 1039 Words
- 5 Pages
Radbruch Accuses Legal Positivism Analysis

In 1946 Gustav Radbruch wrote “Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law”, in which he accuses legal positivism of leaving the legal system of Germany defenceless to the unjust and criminal laws created by the Nazi regime. He basis his accusation on the grounds that legal positivism establishes an automatized legal system, weaponized legal positivism and ______. I believe Radbruch’s accusations are justified but limited as I believe that Radbruch to places too much blame on the judges enforcing the laws and not enough on the juries and informers. In his article Radbruch accuses legal positivism of rendering the German legal system defenceless to unjust laws.…
- 1039 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Compare And Contrast Classical And Biological Positivism
- 1226 Words
- 5 Pages
Compare And Contrast Classical And Biological Positivism

Introduction: There are many unique theories as to why humans commit crime, engage with others in crime, and are lured or motivated by a criminal lifestyle. By studying these theories, one is afforded a chance to develop and then test potential solutions to this enormous social problem that has afflicted humanity since the beginning of time. The various ways of deterring, controlling, preventing, and punishing crime throughout history has changed drastically. Attempting to attack the problem of crime head on, has not worked; so developing different ways to learn why, adapt, and address the root causes of crime is the current strategy. One very important point is that the structural frameworks and contributions from both classical school of…
- 1226 Words
- 5 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Decent Essays
Controversy On Immorality
- 109 Words
- 1 Pages
Controversy On Immorality

Hello JL, An interesting subject. I especially like it in relation to the time period that you’ve chosen. Below are some suggestions to consider: • Do some light research on homosexuality during the Middle Ages just so you can further push your argument as well as to enrich your dialogue with historical facts. • Add more context at the beginning of your dialogue, it seems vague.…
- 109 Words
- 1 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More
Improved Essays
Hart And Fuller Debate Analysis
- 792 Words
- 4 Pages
Hart And Fuller Debate Analysis

The Hart-Fuller debate published in the Harvard Law Review was a first attack to Fuller’s theories by Professor Hart, an influential positivist at the time. He brought up the case of Apartheid as mentioned above and also the problem of the Nazi Regime, contending that both of the legal system contains valid laws on a positivist view. Fuller rejects this argument by saying they were using law as an “instrument of an arbitrary and tyrannical dictatorship” and such laws should be considered invalid. These views are then shown further when Hart discussed on the dilemma of “The Grudge Informer” proposed by Fuller. The Grudge Informer tells a fictitious story of a state newly overturned from an unethical regime, one that bears resemblance with the…
- 792 Words
- 4 Pages
Improved Essays

Read More
Great Essays
Summary Of The Elements Of Moral Philosophy By James And Stuart Rachels
- 1430 Words
- 6 Pages
Summary Of The Elements Of Moral Philosophy By James And Stuart Rachels

Philosophy 2306 Final Paper In The Elements of Moral Philosophy, James and Stuart Rachels discuss the ideas of ethics that a novice should challenge. This book consists of thirteen chapters. First, the author begins with the minimum conception of morality; the following three chapters cover cultural relativism and the connection between morality and religion; the middle chapters, five to twelve, focus on essential ethical theories; and the last chapter describes the author’s perspective of what a satisfactory moral theory should be like.…
- 1430 Words
- 6 Pages
Great Essays

Read More
Superior Essays
Hart-Fuller Debate Analysis
- 1154 Words
- 5 Pages
Hart-Fuller Debate Analysis

Further, while Hart does not define ‘necessary connection’, he proves to be liberal in his interpretation. Despite this, the critics of positivism have managed to reach a patently false conclusion that, according to positivism, there is no connection whatsoever between law and morality. Therefore, Fuller argues, Hart’s ‘minimum content theory’ represents a contradiction on his part. Fuller believes such theory is analogous with the law’s internal morality, only Hart refers to this as ‘justice in the administration of laws’.…
- 1154 Words
- 5 Pages
Superior Essays

Read More
Great Essays
Hard And Soft Positivist Analysis
- 1632 Words
- 7 Pages
Hard And Soft Positivist Analysis

For example, when judges rule on cases which involve weighing up several legal rules, they exercise their discretionary abilities to find a course of action that they feel is the best. But these ‘moral’ issues, the soft positivist proposes, are no more than social attitudes and norms; morality does not transcend a society. The laws allowing slavery would be deemed evil today, while at the time they reflected what was socially acceptable. Hard positivism, defended by Joseph Raz , maintains that law and morality not only need not be connected, they must not be connected. The concept of law can only be explained without any reference to morality at all.…
- 1632 Words
- 7 Pages
Great Essays

Read More
Great Essays
Grudge Informer Case Analysis
- 2196 Words
- 9 Pages
Grudge Informer Case Analysis

Proposition: Hart argues that we conceptualized the Grudge informer case by maintaining unjust law is still a law, but perhaps so unjust that it should be disobeyed: On the one hand, we will begin our analysis by explaining the first part of the proposition “Hart argues that we conceptualized the Grudge informer case by maintaining unjust law is still a law”. In order to understand why according to him an unjust law is still a law, it is necessary to remind briefly his view on the connection between law and morality. As a matter of fact, it is obvious that as Hart is a legal positivist, he is claiming that there is not a necessary connection between law and morality but a contingent one . Nevertheless, even if there is a possible connection…
- 2196 Words
- 9 Pages
Great Essays

Read More
Decent Essays
Difference Between Natural Law And Legal Positivism
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Difference Between Natural Law And Legal Positivism

A legal positivism should be from an establishment of that law by some socially recognized legal authority. There is a clear cut between law and morality in legal positivism. Legal positivist such as John Austin view law on a logical aspect of law, in which morality does not have a place in. The main differences between natural law and legal positivism is the element of morality. Natural law provides that the law should reflect on moral order whereas the legal positivism states that there is no connection between law and morality.…
- 833 Words
- 4 Pages
Decent Essays

Read More

Related Topics